ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: session layers, was Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?

2007-09-17 07:09:21
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, John Day wrote:

I am afraid that I must agree with Fred.  There is nothing very new in this
paper and its publication is merely another indication of how far down the
blind alley we have gone.  I was surprised SIGCOMM even published dressing up
X.25 Fast Select with fancy words.  Amazing.

Isn't Fast Select more like RFC 1644 TCP for Transactions than Ford's
Structured Streams? IIUC, X.25 and SCTP have similarly static multiplexing
configurations and delimited records, unlike SST.

Tony.
-- 
f.a.n.finch  <dot(_at_)dotat(_dot_)at>  http://dotat.at/
IRISH SEA: SOUTHERLY, BACKING NORTHEASTERLY FOR A TIME, 3 OR 4. SLIGHT OR
MODERATE. SHOWERS. MODERATE OR GOOD, OCCASIONALLY POOR.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>