On 2007-11-29, at 6:28, ext ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org wrote:
I agree with your reasoning. I should have asked,
why do *ALL* IETF meetings have to be monolithic and all-inclusive?
They don't. Several WGs are holding interim meetings between the IETF
meetings. I'm not sure if there have been joint interims with multiple
WGs attending, but that could make sense if there's a difficult piece
of work that they need to agree on. Our rules allow this.
Ietf mailing list