Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:|
I am not advocating "v6 to v6 NATs", as confirmed by some of my earlier
messages that argue against.
NATs will be needed during the (long) transition period, including
some NATs dealing with both IPv6 and IPv4.
I don't see how the transition from IPv4 to IPv6 requires NAT in IPv6.
But, if an IPv6-only client has to be able to reach an IPv4-only
server, I keep saying that some NATs will have to deal BOTH with IPv6
(client side) and IPv4 (server side).
As a matter of fact, your recent I-D on MNAT-PT does propose ways of
With this clarification, I believe we are in agreement.
Ietf mailing list