On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 18:31:24 -0700
Dave Crocker <dhc2(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net> wrote:
Spencer Dawkins wrote:
I have misunderstood before, but one point of view I've heard
expressed was that
- NomCom is supposed to choose the best candidate, while
- the confirming body is supposed to make sure NomCom chose a good
That sounds like exactly the opposite of a rational sequence.
Nomcom's always do an early filter against clear inadequacy. If that
leaves no candidates, they search for more.
This is like doing late-stage reviews, after a working group has been
operating for two years, and raising strategic concerns about their
entire apporach: Good issues, but at the wrong time.
So what do you see as the role of the confirming body?
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
IETF mailing list