Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Seems good to me. Will the "archived" and "rejected" errata
be visible to the public? I think that should be mentioned.
Ideally the IESG procedure is integrated in the errata draft
and published as RFC (it could be even a BCP).
BTW, "errata" is a plural noun. The singular is "erratum."
But we rarely get away with the singular... ;-)
IETF mailing list