Stewart Bryant wrote:
At least three ADs believe that the examples should be changed
I agree with them.
Use of any identifier outside the example space may cause real harm to
the owner, where that harm may range from serious harm (technical
and/or financial) to mild embarrassment.
If anyone wants to use an identifier outside the example space, then to
protect both the owner of the identifier and the IETF, the author really
needs to provide the IETF with evidence of written authorization to use
it for this purpose.
In the case of this draft, have the owners of the identifiers
been contacted by the author, and do they agree to this use?
You are aware that the same examples have been in a published RFC for
over seven years?
IETF mailing list