IETF Discussion (date)
July 31, 2008
- Re: About IETF communication skills, Paul Hoffman, 23:40
- RE: About IETF communication skills, Tony Hain, 22:21
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 21:53
- RE: About IETF communication skills, John Morris, 20:49
- Re: About IETF communication skills, Stephen Farrell, 19:35
- RE: About IETF communication skills, michael.dillon, 15:58
- Re: About IETF communication skills, Steven M. Bellovin, 15:39
- RE: About IETF communication skills, michael.dillon, 15:09
- Re: About IETF communication skills, Keith Moore, 14:33
- Re: About IETF communication skills, Keith Moore, 14:30
- Re: About IETF communication skills, ned+ietf, 14:17
- Re: About IETF communication skills, Randy Presuhn, 13:24
- Re: About IETF communication skills, Keith Moore, 13:09
- Re: About IETF communication skills, ned+ietf, 12:51
- Re: About IETF communication skills, Steven M. Bellovin, 11:46
- Re: About IETF communication skills, Marshall Eubanks, 11:38
- Re: About IETF communication skills, Ted Faber, 11:25
- Re: About IETF communication skills, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 11:15
- Re: About IETF communication skills, Daniel Brown, 11:12
- Re: About IETF communication skills, Joel Jaeggli, 11:09
- Re: About IETF communication skills, Daniel Brown, 10:59
- Re: Disappointing to not have plenary slides online for remote participants..., Olaf Kolkman, 10:52
- Re: About IETF communication skills, Lixia Zhang, 10:51
- Webpages for Hiroshima info, Ole Jacobsen, 10:17
- Disappointing to not have plenary slides online for remote participants..., Dan York, 09:56
- About IETF communication skills, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 09:53
- Re: IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream, Harald Alvestrand, 07:56
- Re: IAB Open Microphone session on Thursday?, David Kessens, 07:41
- Re: IAB Open Microphone session on Thursday?, Dave Crocker, 07:34
- Re: IAB Open Microphone session on Thursday?, Olaf Kolkman, 07:11
- Re: IAB Open Microphone session on Thursday?, David Kessens, 06:53
- Re: IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream, Russ Housley, 03:13
- Re: IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream, Harald Alvestrand, 00:38
July 29, 2008
- IAB's Introduction to the Wed Technical Plenary, Gregory Lebovitz, 12:19
- Re: FYA: I bet this will confuse a few users..., Stephane Bortzmeyer, 11:46
- FYA: I bet this will confuse a few users..., Brian E Carpenter, 10:43
- Re: GEOPRIV and ECRIT experiments at IETF 72, Richard Barnes, 10:41
- GEOPRIV and ECRIT experiments at IETF 72, Richard Barnes, 10:37
- Last call comments for capwap-threat-analysis-01, Pasi.Eronen, 08:56
- Need XP recovery, anyone have the CD?, Robert Moskowitz, 05:22
- Last call comments for capwap-protocol-binding-ieee80211-07, Pasi.Eronen, 02:49
- Re: Missing Materials, Dean Willis, 02:11
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Jari Arkko, 02:02
July 28, 2008
- Racom Card Found, Christian Vogt, 16:25
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject (procedural nits), Frank Ellermann, 15:55
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject, Steven M. Bellovin, 15:49
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject, Frank Ellermann, 15:40
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject (procedural nits), ned+ietf, 11:49
- RE: [Capwap] Last call comments for capwap-protocol-specification-11, Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), 11:41
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject, ned+ietf, 11:06
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject (procedural nits), Scott Kitterman, 10:17
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject (procedural nits), Frank Ellermann, 09:34
- RE: request for comments -- how to?, michael.dillon, 09:31
- request for comments -- how to?, dig asm, 09:22
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject (procedural nits), Alexey Melnikov, 07:45
- Re: NATs necessary for IPv6, says IETF chair, Brian E Carpenter, 06:41
- Re: NATs necessary for IPv6, says IETF chair, Lars Eggert, 06:26
- Found Safeword Platinum tokencard, Julien Laganier, 05:58
- NATs necessary for IPv6, says IETF chair, Marc Manthey, 05:56
- Re: Chairs: Helping out remote participants, Dan York, 05:15
- Chairs: Helping out remote participants, Philip Matthews, 04:19
July 27, 2008
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject (procedural nits), Frank Ellermann, 17:42
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject, Frank Ellermann, 15:04
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject (Sieve Email Filtering: Reject and Extended Reject Extensions) to Proposed Standard, ned+ietf, 11:21
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject (Sieve Email Filtering: Reject and Extended Reject Extensions) to Proposed Standard, Frank Ellermann, 09:22
- RE: [Ietf-krb-wg] Late Last Call comments: draft-ietf-krb-wg-anonymous, Larry Zhu, 08:03
- RE: [Ietf-krb-wg] Late Last Call comments: draft-ietf-krb-wg-anonymous, Larry Zhu, 08:01
- RE: [Ietf-krb-wg] Late Last Call Comment: draft-ietf-krb-wg-naming-04.txt, Larry Zhu, 07:02
- RE: secdir review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-naming-04.txt, Larry Zhu, 06:21
July 26, 2008
- Last call comments for capwap-protocol-specification-11, Pasi.Eronen, 08:15
- IETF-75: sailing to Stockholm, Lars Eggert, 06:55
- Re: Draft IAOC Administrative Policy, Dave Crocker, 05:03
- Re: Draft IAOC Administrative Policy, Brian E Carpenter, 04:46
- Re: Missing Materials, Harald Alvestrand, 04:35
- Draft IAOC Administrative Policy, Ray Pelletier, 00:53
July 25, 2008
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Daniel Brown, 11:15
- Last Call comments on draft-sanchez-webdav-current-principal-01, Julian Reschke, 06:08
- Audio Streaming - IETF 72 July 27th - August 1st, Joel Jaeggli, 05:20
- Re: Missing Materials, Spencer Dawkins, 04:46
- Re: Missing Materials, Alexey Melnikov, 03:51
- Re: Missing Materials, Joel Jaeggli, 00:44
July 24, 2008
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 21:53
- Re: Missing Materials, Eric Rescorla, 16:45
- Re: Teleconf [Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73], Marc Manthey, 15:55
- Re: Missing Materials, Jari Arkko, 15:21
- Re: Missing Materials, Frank Ellermann, 14:34
- Teleconf [Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73], Brian E Carpenter, 14:14
- Re: Missing Materials, Stewart Bryant, 13:57
- Missing Materials, Eric Rescorla, 13:40
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Marc Manthey, 09:06
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Eric Burger, 08:12
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Eric Burger, 08:10
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Marshall Eubanks, 07:05
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Marc Manthey, 06:19
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Marshall Eubanks, 05:53
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Marc Manthey, 05:12
- RE: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Russ Housley, 05:03
- Re: www3.tools.ietf.org very heavily loaded, Henrik Levkowetz, 03:41
July 23, 2008
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Marshall Eubanks, 09:38
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Marshall Eubanks, 09:15
- Re: left mailing list, Daniel Brown, 08:24
- left mailing list, Huntak Lee, 08:16
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Eric Burger, 08:04
- www3.tools.ietf.org very heavily loaded, Henrik Levkowetz, 05:57
July 21, 2008
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Marshall Eubanks, 18:34
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Brian E Carpenter, 16:28
- RE: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, ned+ietf, 16:02
- RE: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, michael.dillon, 14:32
- Re: IANA Update: Project to convert registries to XML, Michelle Cotton, 14:28
- Re: IANA Update: Project to convert registries to XML, James Cloos, 13:30
- Re: IANA Update: Project to convert registries to XML, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 11:48
- RE: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, michael.dillon, 11:31
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Dave Crocker, 10:49
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Dave Crocker, 10:19
- RE: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Eric Gray, 10:01
- Re: [netlmm] WG Review: Recharter of Network-based Localized Mobility Management (netlmm), Charles E. Perkins, 09:47
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, John C Klensin, 09:45
- Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Ned Freed, 09:43
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Ned Freed, 09:42
- Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, John C Klensin, 09:41
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Nathaniel Borenstein, 09:40
- Gen-art review of draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-basic-schemes-revised-05, Elwyn Davies, 09:39
- RE: Draft Trust Policy re: Rights in IETF Documents, Contreras, Jorge, 09:38
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, John C Klensin, 09:36
- RE: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, ned+ietf, 09:05
- RE: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Eric Gray, 07:28
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Tom.Petch, 04:03
July 20, 2008
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Dave Cridland, 21:06
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Network-based Localized Mobility Management (netlmm), Jari Arkko, 14:06
- Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Spencer Dawkins, 12:37
- Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, ned+ietf, 12:32
- Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, John C Klensin, 12:00
- Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Dave Crocker, 11:48
- Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Russ Housley, 11:08
- Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Pete Resnick, 10:27
- Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Spencer Dawkins, 10:05
- Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, ned+ietf, 08:32
- Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Spencer Dawkins, 06:11
July 19, 2008
- Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Dave Crocker, 21:06
- Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, ned+ietf, 20:42
- Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Dave Crocker, 19:28
- Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, ned+ietf, 18:51
- Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Brian E Carpenter, 18:36
- Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, ned+ietf, 18:23
- Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Brian E Carpenter, 17:57
- Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, ned+ietf, 16:25
- Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, ned+ietf, 16:22
- Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, John Leslie, 16:19
- Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Steven M. Bellovin, 15:59
- Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, John C Klensin, 15:57
- Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Dave Crocker, 15:43
- Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Jari Arkko, 14:02
- Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Russ Housley, 12:17
- Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, John C Klensin, 10:44
- Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Scott Brim, 09:21
- Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, John C Klensin, 08:27
- Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, ned+ietf, 08:22
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 08:09
- Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, John C Klensin, 07:37
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Marshall Eubanks, 07:04
- Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Marshall Eubanks, 06:07
- Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Scott Brim, 05:48
- Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Spencer Dawkins, 04:56
- Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Jari Arkko, 04:29
July 18, 2008
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Eliot Lear, 22:50
- Re: Will IPv4 be turned off at IETF 72?, Russ Housley, 16:03
- Will IPv4 be turned off at IETF 72?, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond, 15:53
- Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, James M. Polk, 15:31
- Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Adrian Farrel, 15:22
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, James Galvin, 14:00
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Eliot Lear, 13:55
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Marshall Eubanks, 12:48
- Re: IANA Update: Project to convert registries to XML, James Cloos, 12:47
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 12:27
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Kurt Erik Lindqvist, 12:13
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Keith Moore, 11:29
- Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Russ Housley, 11:19
- Re: Conference calls (Was: Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73), Spencer Dawkins, 11:15
- RE: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Mary Barnes, 11:13
- Conference calls (Was: Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73), Jari Arkko, 10:21
- RE: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Mary Barnes, 10:18
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Dave Crocker, 09:59
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 09:40
- RE: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Mary Barnes, 09:33
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Spencer Dawkins, 09:14
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Dave Crocker, 09:05
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Dave Crocker, 09:02
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Eliot Lear, 08:59
- Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Adrian Farrel, 08:43
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Andy Bierman, 08:37
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Cyrus Daboo, 08:36
- RE: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Mary Barnes, 08:35
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Cyrus Daboo, 08:34
- Re: Draft Trust Policy re: Rights in IETF Documents, C.T. Aiken, 08:33
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Russ Housley, 08:08
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Russ Housley, 08:01
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Eliot Lear, 07:57
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Jari Arkko, 07:53
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Dave Crocker, 07:45
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Eric Rescorla, 07:27
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 07:26
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Keith Moore, 06:52
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Marshall Eubanks, 06:50
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Eric Rosen, 06:49
- Re: Draft Trust Policy re: Rights in IETF Documents, Frank Ellermann, 05:39
- Draft Trust Policy re: Rights in IETF Documents, Ray Pelletier, 04:31
- RE: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, michael.dillon, 02:57
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Eliot Lear, 02:42
July 17, 2008
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 21:53
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Bill Manning, 20:14
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Scott O. Bradner, 19:46
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, John C Klensin, 19:27
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Brian E Carpenter, 18:52
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Marshall Eubanks, 18:49
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Olafur Gudmundsson, 16:58
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Tony Hansen, 16:30
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Russ Housley, 16:23
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Adrian Farrel, 16:19
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Russ Housley, 16:14
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Joel Jaeggli, 15:57
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Dave Crocker, 15:43
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Andrew Sullivan, 15:35
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, James M. Polk, 15:25
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Tony Hansen, 15:20
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Brian E Carpenter, 15:15
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Marshall Eubanks, 15:05
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Paul Hoffman, 14:58
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Robert Sparks, 14:41
- Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, IETF Chair, 14:34
- Re: Last Call: draft-reschke-webdav-search (Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV) SEARCH) to Proposed Standard, Javier Godoy, 09:42
- IAOC & IAD Dublin Office Hours, Ray Pelletier, 08:27
July 11, 2008
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, John C Klensin, 07:19
- New IETF Journal available now (Volume 4, Issue 1), Mirjam Kuehne, 07:14
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Keith Moore, 06:50
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Eliot Lear, 06:40
- Why we need two seperate tables for inbound and outbound in draft-ietf-pwe3-pw-atm-mib-05.txt, Murugesan Ramalingam, 03:22
July 10, 2008
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 21:53
- Upcoming Jabber Server Load Test, Alexa Morris, 14:42
- Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, Jeroen Massar, 13:08
- Re: Last Call: draft-manner-router-alert-iana (IANA Considerations for the IPv4 and IPv6 Router Alert Option) to Proposed Standard, Joe Baptista, 12:27
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, John C Klensin, 09:17
- Re: Last Call: draft-manner-router-alert-iana (IANA Considerations for the IPv4 and IPv6 Router Alert Option) to Proposed Standard, Robert Elz, 09:11
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Bob Braden, 08:53
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Frank Ellermann, 06:37
- Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, Kurt Erik Lindqvist, 04:07
July 09, 2008
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, John C Klensin, 18:00
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Keith Moore, 16:33
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Ted Hardie, 14:27
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, John C Klensin, 14:04
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Keith Moore, 13:24
- Re: Need some IPv6 help wiht RHEL/Centos 5, Marc Manthey, 13:02
- Re: Need some IPv6 help wiht RHEL/Centos 5, Robert Moskowitz, 12:47
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Ted Faber, 10:31
- More example TLDs in 2606bis? (was: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist), Frank Ellermann, 10:27
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Spencer Dawkins, 10:22
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Paul Hoffman, 10:04
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Bill McQuillan, 09:38
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Spencer Dawkins, 08:49
- Regarding missing an object in pwAtmCfgTable (draft-ietf-pwe3-pw-atm-mib-05.txt), Murugesan Ramalingam, 08:06
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Thomas Narten, 07:21
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Joe Touch, 07:20
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Bill Manning, 06:29
July 08, 2008
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Frank Ellermann, 23:49
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Mark Andrews, 22:15
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Joe Touch, 21:34
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Frank Ellermann, 20:19
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Mark Andrews, 19:55
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Keith Moore, 19:00
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Mark Andrews, 18:52
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Ted Faber, 18:44
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Mark Andrews, 17:55
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Brian E Carpenter, 17:15
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Keith Moore, 14:48
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Keith Moore, 14:41
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Ted Faber, 14:37
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Theodore Tso, 14:35
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Keith Moore, 14:12
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Joe Touch, 14:04
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Keith Moore, 13:50
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Ted Faber, 13:43
- RE: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, John C Klensin, 13:35
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Joe Touch, 13:33
- RE: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Bert Wijnen - IETF, 13:28
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Keith Moore, 13:23
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, John C Klensin, 13:22
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, John C Klensin, 13:05
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Joe Touch, 12:59
- RE: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Bert Wijnen - IETF, 12:43
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Dave Crocker, 12:37
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Pete Resnick, 12:29
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Pete Resnick, 12:18
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, John Levine, 12:14
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Dave Crocker, 12:08
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Tony Finch, 12:04
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Keith Moore, 12:03
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Joe Touch, 11:57
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Keith Moore, 11:50
- Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, IETF Chair, 11:45
- Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, Keith Moore, 11:42
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Joe Touch, 11:36
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Keith Moore, 11:33
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Keith Moore, 11:19
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Joe Touch, 11:18
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Joe Touch, 11:14
- Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, Kurt Erik Lindqvist, 10:35
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Ted Faber, 10:28
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Keith Moore, 09:24
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Ted Faber, 09:15
- RE: Single-letter names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on therecent ICANN changes?), John C Klensin, 09:13
- Re: Single-letter names, Eric Brunner-Williams, 09:12
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Bob Braden, 08:53
- Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] Late Last Call comments: draft-ietf-krb-wg-anonymous, Sam Hartman, 07:21
- RE: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606, Cellario Luca, 06:40
- Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606, John C Klensin, 06:33
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Marshall Eubanks, 06:14
- Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606, Bill Manning, 04:30
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, John C Klensin, 02:14
July 07, 2008
- Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606, John C Klensin, 22:49
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Mark Andrews, 22:27
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, John C Klensin, 21:35
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Douglas Otis, 21:18
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Brian E Carpenter, 20:49
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Keith Moore, 20:28
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Joe Abley, 19:55
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Mark Andrews, 19:54
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Ted Faber, 19:03
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Mark Andrews, 18:48
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Dave Crocker, 18:47
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Mark Andrews, 18:46
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, James Seng, 18:37
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Ted Faber, 18:34
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Dave Crocker, 18:15
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Frank Ellermann, 17:25
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Mark Andrews, 17:18
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Ted Faber, 17:17
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Mark Andrews, 16:59
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Bill Manning, 15:50
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, John C Klensin, 15:37
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Ted Faber, 15:26
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Theodore Tso, 15:13
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Karl Auerbach, 15:08
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Willie Gillespie, 14:57
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Theodore Tso, 14:42
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Keith Moore, 14:41
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Ted Faber, 14:26
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Ted Faber, 14:14
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, John C Klensin, 14:13
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Bill Manning, 14:09
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Theodore Tso, 14:08
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Ted Faber, 13:57
- Re: Response to appeal [...], Frank Ellermann, 13:40
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Ted Faber, 13:39
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, moore, 13:34
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, John Levine, 12:44
- Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606, Bill Manning, 12:10
- Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, SM, 11:40
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Dave Crocker, 11:06
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, John Levine, 10:54
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, John C Klensin, 10:50
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Keith Moore, 10:25
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, John Levine, 10:19
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Keith Moore, 10:00
- Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, Keith Moore, 09:55
- Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606), Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond, 09:51
- RE: Single-letter names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on therecent ICANN changes?), Ted Hardie, 09:47
- Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, Francis Dupont, 09:29
- RE: Single-letter names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on therecent ICANN changes?), michael.dillon, 09:27
- Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606, John C Klensin, 09:26
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Dave Crocker, 09:25
- Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 09:22
- Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, Dave Crocker, 09:14
- RE: Single-letter names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes?), Edmon Chung, 09:02
- Re: Single-letter names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes?), Vint Cerf, 09:00
- Re: Single-letter names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes?), William Tan, 08:59
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes?, Vint Cerf, 08:58
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Lyman Chapin, 08:56
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes?, Lyman Chapin, 08:55
- Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, Ned Freed, 08:44
- Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606, Jaap Akkerhuis, 06:04
July 06, 2008
- Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606, Mark Andrews, 21:38
- Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606, John Levine, 20:22
- Need some IPv6 help wiht RHEL/Centos 5, Robert Moskowitz, 19:42
- Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606, Mark Andrews, 19:26
- Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606, John Levine, 19:13
- Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606, Mark Andrews, 17:31
July 05, 2008
- Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606, John C Klensin, 16:39
- Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606, Brian E Carpenter, 14:35
- An Internet for the Rich, LB, 10:37
- Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606, John Levine, 06:01
- Re: Services and top-level DNS names, Frank Ellermann, 01:00
July 04, 2008
- Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606, Mark Andrews, 22:01
- Re: Services and top-level DNS names, Frank Ellermann, 20:28
- Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606, John Levine, 19:44
- Re: Services and top-level DNS names, Karl Auerbach, 19:10
- RE: Single-letter names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes?), JFC Morfin, 17:45
- RE: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?), John C Klensin, 16:50
- Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606, Mark Andrews, 15:43
- Re: Single-letter names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes?), John C Klensin, 15:38
- Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?), Mark Andrews, 15:35
- Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606, Dave Crocker, 14:53
- Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606, John Levine, 14:14
- RE: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?), Bernard Aboba, 13:52
- RE: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?), John C Klensin, 11:36
- Single-letter names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes?), John C Klensin, 10:51
- RE: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?), Bernard Aboba, 10:50
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Dave Crocker, 10:20
- Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?), John C Klensin, 09:52
- Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, kent, 09:44
- Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, Keith Moore, 07:54
- Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, Jeroen Massar, 06:22
- Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, John C Klensin, 06:11
- Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, Kurt Erik Lindqvist, 03:50
- Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, Kurt Erik Lindqvist, 03:38
- Draft on how to correctly configure servers and other hosts (IPv4+IPv6) (Was: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers), Jeroen Massar, 03:35
July 03, 2008
- Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, kent, 23:23
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 21:53
- Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents, Ed Juskevicius, 17:53
- Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, Mark Andrews, 17:48
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Mark Andrews, 17:16
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Mark Andrews, 16:15
- Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, TS Glassey, 15:51
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, James Seng, 15:33
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, James Seng, 15:32
- RE: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Bernard Aboba, 15:27
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes?, James Seng, 15:15
- Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, Bill Manning, 15:07
- Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, Mark Andrews, 14:58
- Followup on draft-mraihi-inch-thraud-06.txt (was re: Gen-ART Last Call Review of draft-mraihi-inch-thraud-05), Ben Campbell, 14:43
- Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, Keith Moore, 09:53
- RE: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, michael.dillon, 09:43
- Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, John Levine, 09:39
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes?, Frank Ellermann, 09:14
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes?, James Seng, 09:13
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Frank Ellermann, 09:11
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Frank Ellermann, 09:10
- Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, Keith Moore, 08:59
- Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, Keith Moore, 08:52
- Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, Dave Crocker, 07:07
- Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, John Levine, 06:59
- Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, Jeroen Massar, 06:58
- Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, Bill Manning, 06:48
- Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, Keith Moore, 05:39
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Mark Andrews, 04:22
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, SM, 02:18
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 01:07
July 02, 2008
- Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, Mark Andrews, 23:13
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Frank Ellermann, 23:08
- problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, 'kent', 22:49
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Frank Ellermann, 22:05
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Mark Andrews, 21:49
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, SM, 17:27
- RE: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Bernard Aboba, 17:08
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Mark Andrews, 16:24
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes?, John C Klensin, 16:03
- RE: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Bernard Aboba, 15:48
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, John C Klensin, 15:41
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Steve Crocker, 15:40
- [ Re: [mpls] WG Review: Recharter of Multiprotocol Label Switching (mpls)], Loa Andersson, 15:39
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes?, Lyman Chapin, 15:38
- RE: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, John C Klensin, 15:19
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Paul Hoffman, 10:48
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, John Levine, 09:54
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Ole Jacobsen, 09:33
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Paul Hoffman, 09:26
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes?, Steve Crocker, 08:41
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, James Seng, 08:39
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Thomas Narten, 07:18
- RE: Qualitative Analysis of IETF and IESG trends (Re: Measuring IETF and IESG trends), Romascanu, Dan (Dan), 05:48
- Re: Qualitative Analysis of IETF and IESG trends (Re: Measuring IETF and IESG trends), Jari Arkko, 05:29
July 01, 2008
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes?, John Levine, 15:37
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes?, Paul Hoffman, 15:27
- Re: Qualitative Analysis of IETF and IESG trends (Re: Measuring IETF and IESG trends), Brian E Carpenter, 14:59
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, John C Klensin, 14:55
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Philip Guenther, 14:47
- Re: Qualitative Analysis of IETF and IESG trends (Re: Measuring IETF and IESG trends), Joel M. Halpern, 14:08
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, David Conrad, 13:58
- Re: Qualitative Analysis of IETF and IESG trends (Re: Measuring IETF and IESG trends), Ted Hardie, 13:57
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Thomas Narten, 13:52
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 12:49
- RE: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:59
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity, John Leslie, 09:52
- RE: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:50
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Dave Crocker, 09:45
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Tony Finch, 09:41
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity, John Levine, 08:40
- RE: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:13
- Re: Subscriber List Damage, Frank Ellermann, 00:05