At 3:01 AM +0200 8/26/08, Frank Ellermann wrote:
Paul Hoffman wrote:
It has to be tuned for the "or more" part of "one or more".
I can't fully parse your meaning, but I think I disagree.
Yes, I also think we disagree. I prefer one file and URL per
figure, avoiding all questions of TARs / ZIPs / JARs / TGZs
to bundle them.
There are no such questions with the proposal. The RFC Editor gets to
decide how to handle this instead of us trying to mandate this from
> The RFC Editor, on a case-by-case basis, can choose to have
> one file containing multiple figures, or multiple files.
Can we maybe agree on "one subdirectory" for these "packs" ?
No. For one, I didn't say "packs", you did. For another, it is silly
to try to lock this down now before we have working examples of what
would be best.
I'd like to have a "one-click interface" (IPR: ammazon) per
And I would like the RFC Editor to have flexibility to do the right
thing as time moves on.
P.S., unrelated, John wrote about UTF-8:
| I don't see any point in trying to discuss or critique such
| proposals until there is one...
...which is long-expired for very good reason.
--Paul Hoffman, Director
Ietf mailing list