Tony Finch wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2008, Keith Moore wrote:
Tony Finch wrote:
In any case, DNSBLs should scale roughly according to the size of the
routing table, not the size of the address space.
What does it mean for a DNSBL to "scale"?
I was referring to the number of entries that have to be maintained.
okay. I found myself wondering if the change in address space size, and
in granularity of assignment, might make DNSBLs less reliable. Which is
a different kind of scalability.
Keith
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf