ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?

2008-11-18 16:57:06
I recall stats from IETF 71 (which may be out of date).  I believe at
that time, 48% of attendees were from the U.S.  Next was Japan with 9%,
then China with 5.7%.  If I recall correctly, this was a good number of
attendees from China, but I do not know how that compared to IETF 72 or
to IETF 73.  Is the visa issue for visitors from all countries coming to
the U.S., or is this specific to Chinese citizens coming to the U.S.

Jason 

-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org 
[mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On 
Behalf Of Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo)
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 3:28 PM
To: ext Joel Jaeggli; Yi Zhao
Cc: 'David Quigley'; 73attendees(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; 'Nicholas Weaver'; 
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA 
qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?

Hi everybody,

In the IAOC, we have followed the visa situation for 
different nations closely. It is obviously in the benefit for 
the IETF to have all the participants that want and need to 
come to the IETF could also come.

Historically, the IETF community has indicated the preference 
of having a big part of the meetings in the North American 
region. This makes us often come to the USA. Traditionally a 
major part of the participation is from the North American region.

Of course, we should periodically check this policy, and also 
follow the visa situation very carefully.

I think it would be good for people that were trying to come 
to the IETF and couldn't to tell the IAD or me what happened. 
Accurate data is very important.

Cheers,

Jonne.




On 11/18/08 10:08 PM, "ext Joel Jaeggli" <joelja(_at_)bogus(_dot_)com> wrote:

Yi Zhao wrote:
Based on my knowledge, for Chinese citizens there is no 
any problem 
to get the visa to other countries except US.

I know for a fact that several of your countrymen have had trouble 
obtaining visas for other recent IETF destinations.

 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
---

*From:* 73attendees-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
[mailto:73attendees-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] *On Behalf Of *David 
Quigley
*Sent:* Tuesday, November 18, 2008 1:56 PM
*To:* Nicholas Weaver
*Cc:* 73attendees(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
*Subject:* Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified 
for2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?

 

Disclaimer: What I say here are my words and don't represent the 
views of my employer.

 

From what I see here the issues are mostly experienced by Chinese 
citizens. Most of the other countries have reciprocal visa 
agreements 
with the US. China however doesn't have that agreement 
with Ireland, 
Sweden, Japan, or the US. Were there similar problems with gaining 
entrance into Ireland? Will there be similar issues with gaining 
entrance into Sweden or Japan?

 

Dave

On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Nicholas Weaver 
<nweaver(_at_)icsi(_dot_)berkeley(_dot_)edu 
<mailto:nweaver(_at_)icsi(_dot_)berkeley(_dot_)edu>> wrote:


On Nov 18, 2008, at 10:53 AM, Scott Brim wrote:

    Excerpts from Randy Bush on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 10:39:57AM -0600:

    qdang(_at_)nist(_dot_)gov <mailto:qdang(_at_)nist(_dot_)gov> wrote:

    I believe our US government would like to grant visas 
to as many
    people as they can. However, if anyone wants to attend 
a meeting in
    the US is granted a visa to come here, then I can 
imagine there will
    be 100 million visa applications for the IETF meeting 
in CA next year
    alone.


    thank you for demonstrating so clearly the jingoistic 
prejudice at the
    us government level that should preclude ietf being 
held in the united
    states.


    How would you solve the problem?  Let 100 million 
people in on false
    pretenses?  I'm not going to defend the behavior of 
the US government,
    but I want you to admit that US immigration has a 
difficult problem.
    Slinging labels around doesn't help.

 

Remember, the IETF is NOT special.  There are tens of thousands of 
conferences, and they are all pretty much 
need-to-be-treated equal.  
If the US gave effectively carte blanch to conference 
attendees, you 
would have no immigration controls, period, as this would be a big 
enough loophole to fly an A380 through.

The Visa issue in the US is serious, but how many people 
are really 
affected by this?

We need hard data, because the notion of simply "not holding IETF 
meetings in a terrorist country" is not effective.

And if you want to do Visa issues as a criteria, you can strongly 
argue that all IETF meeting SHOULD be in a country where a visa is 
not required for travel for EU, US, Japanese, and Canadian 
citizens.



_______________________________________________
73attendees mailing list
73attendees(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org <mailto:73attendees(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org> 
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees

 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
---

_______________________________________________
73attendees mailing list
73attendees(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

--
Jonne Soininen
Nokia Siemens Networks

Tel: +358 40 527 46 34
E-mail: jonne(_dot_)soininen(_at_)nsn(_dot_)com


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>