On Apr 16, 2009, at 2:29 AM, Tom.Petch wrote:
I am surprised not to have seen more formal reviews of the quartet
for isms I-Ds
whose Last Call has just finished, updating as they do a Standard,
while at the
same time introducing a Transport subsystem and model, and also
introducing a
new (to snmp) way of providing Security.
I do not know what or how these reviews are triggered but I would
have expected
a good deal more than this one and the one that appeared as I was
drafting this
response, a round dozen even.
Gen-art reviews are assigned to a team of volunteers (i.e. the general
area review team.) I'm not sure about the assignment criteria, but I
_think_ we try to catch most, if not every, draft being IETF last
called for publication.
Tom Petch
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ben Campbell" <ben(_at_)estacado(_dot_)net>
To: <ietf(_at_)hardakers(_dot_)net>; <dharrington(_at_)huawei(_dot_)com>; "General Area
Review Team"
<gen-art(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Cc: <j(_dot_)schoenwaelder(_at_)jacobs-university(_dot_)de>;
<ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 10:05 PM
Subject: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-isms-transport-security-
model-12
<snip>
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf