Re: Second Last Call: rfc3852 (Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)) to Dr

The IESG wrote, On 2009-04-27 06:58 PDT:
> The IESG has received a request from the smime WG (smime) to consider 
> the following document:
>
> - 'Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) '
>   RFC 3852 as a Draft Standard
>
> No technical issues were raised during the first Last Call.  However, the
> Last Call failed to highlight two normative references to standards track
> documents of lower maturity:  RFCs 3280 and 3281.
lower maturity?

Did you perhaps mean "greater maturity" or "lower number" ?
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf