Simon Josefsson wrote:
Andrew Sullivan <ajs(_at_)shinkuro(_dot_)com> writes:
In general, registries welcome DNSSEC, no matter how secure it is,
as long as its complicated operation works as an excuse to increase
(or not to reduce) registration charge and registries' revenue.
That is a serious charge.
The organization operating .SE charges for DNSSEC. According to [1] it
costs 250 SEK annually (~22 EUR or ~30 USD) extra per year to protect a
domain name with DNSSEC.
That is the serious charge.
Thank you for the information.
Are there anyone who is not working for registries and is still
interested in deploying DNSSEC for the extra charge despite the
lack of cryptographic security?
If not, let's conclude the thread with a consensus to abandon DNSSEC.
Masataka Ohta
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf