Paul,
I just provided information.
I don't think we can do anything. It is not reasonable for IETF to accept
TSL as bases for our work and it is not possible to turn EU around and
abandon TSL.
However, it has a value to be aware of the situation.
/Stefan
On 09-07-15 1:49 AM, "Paul Hoffman" <paul(_dot_)hoffman(_at_)vpnc(_dot_)org>
wrote:
At 12:42 AM +0200 7/15/09, Stefan Santesson wrote:
There is a substantial risk that we will see two very different approaches
that at least overlap in scope, which may harm interoperability.
And....?
Are you proposing that the IETF abandon its efforts because of the EU's? Or
that the EU abandon its work because of the IETF's? Or that the two dissimilar
protocols somehow be merged (in a way that would cause less, not greater,
confusion)? Or something else?
This is IETF Last Call. Please say what you think should happen in the IETF
context with respect to this document.
--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf