The proposed change to the boilerplate has not drawn a single
negative comment, and there are a few documents in the RFC Editor
queue that are waiting for this change. My preference would be for
the Trust to approve the revised TLP that have not received any
negative comments, and thus release the documents in the RFC Editor
queue. Then, the Trust should put forward alternative text for the
sections that have received negative comments, starting another review period.
Russ
At 06:49 PM 7/18/2009, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Hi,
I am baffled why this announcement, of fundamental importance,
was not sent to the correct list for IETF announcements.
The same applies to the original announcement, sent as I
understand it on 23 June, at a time when I wasn't reading
the discussion list for personal reasons.
I will comment substantively when I've had a chance to
read through the proposal and John's appeal. However, I
would suggest that the announcement should be sent
to the IETF announcement list, and that the one month
comment period should start again at that point.
Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf