Lisa Dusseault <lisa(_dot_)dusseault(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> writes:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 3:42 AM, Simon Josefsson
I object to publishing these IDNA documents as a Draft Standard. I
don't view IDNA2008 as a revision of the earlier IDNA2003 protocol. The
design goals have changed since the first IDNA version. Finally, there
have been little implementation experience with the new protocol.
I would support publication as Proposed Standard.
You are absolutely correct and this is a pilot error on my part. I
didn't notice the documents were automatically listed as going for
Draft Standard in the tracking tools when I issued the Last Call. SM
pointed out that the Last Call announcement mentioned implementation
reports but I didn't realize what caused that error. I will look into
fixing this and reissuing the Last Call announcements.
Thanks -- I didn't read the discussion on the mailing list about the
mistake until now, and I assumed the intention really was to go for
Draft Standard. I am happy that it was just a mistake and I am sorry if
my comment felt confrontational.
Ietf mailing list