On 11/15/09 11:54 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Nov 15, 2009, at 12:03 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
fwiw, I find myself strongly agreeing with what I believe is
Brian's main point, although what I infer from it may be a
little different from what he does (or may not... I'm not sure):
We should not be adopting a "patch" protocol that lacks both the
tools for, or a serious discussion of, transactional integrity.
John, HTTP is not SQL.
+1. Right tool for the right job, please.
Ietf mailing list