RE: If you found today's plenary debate on standards track tedious...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org 
> [mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On 
> Behalf Of Richard Barnes
> Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 4:33 AM
> To: Brian E Carpenter
> Cc: IETF discussion list
> Subject: Re: If you found today's plenary debate on standards 
> track tedious...
>
>
>  From the perspective of the world outside the IETF, this is already  
> the case.  An RFC is an RFC is an RFC...
+1.

And if the IETF wanted to change that perception, the IETF needs
to create a separate document stream -- which I think was the 
intent of the BCP and FYI document streams.  But FYI and BCP 
aren't separate because the documents also have RFC numbers.

-d


> --Richard
>
>
> On Nov 11, 2009, at 7:25 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>
> > Who would like to adopt this idea:
> >
> > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-loughney-newtrk-one-size-fits- 
> > all-01.txt
> >
> >    Brian
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ietf mailing list
> > Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf