Thomas,
I don't necessarily have an opinion about the proposed changes, but I
don't quite understand the rationale.
"Specification Required" is intended to allow for publication of
documents outside of RFCs. It reqiures an Expert Reviewer to look at
the document and make a determination about whether the spec is
sufficiently implementable.
I do not understand this either, but I'll note that draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp
has a ton of Standards Action IANA rules. It does not make sense to have
such rules in a spec that itself is going for Experimental. So maybe
Magnus should have said s/Specification Required/Standards Action/ in
his e-mail... I would support the change of Standards Action rules to
IETF Review.
Jari
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf