IETF Discussion (date)
March 31, 2010
- NAT Traversal With ICMP Replies, Sabahattin Gucukoglu, 19:45
- Re: stable, continuing meeting mailing list?, Dave CROCKER, 18:49
- Re: stable, continuing meeting mailing list?, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 18:28
- Re: stable, continuing meeting mailing list?, Ole Jacobsen, 18:14
- stable, continuing meeting mailing list?, Dave CROCKER, 17:55
- Re: [77all] No Host for IETF 77, Russ Housley, 17:50
- Re: [77all] No Host for IETF 77, IETF Chair, 13:03
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht, todd glassey, 07:15
March 30, 2010
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht, Dean Willis, 23:09
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht, John Levine, 19:07
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht, Michael Dillon, 15:44
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht, Martin Rex, 14:20
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht, Spencer Dawkins, 12:51
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht, Ole Jacobsen, 12:35
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht, Spencer Dawkins, 12:22
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht, Ole Jacobsen, 11:53
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht, Dmitry Burkov, 11:43
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht, John Levine, 11:13
- Re: T-shirts?, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 11:04
- Re: T-shirts?, Simon Josefsson, 10:55
- OpsDir review of draft-zimmermann-avt-zrtp-17, Black_David, 10:33
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht, Paul Wouters, 09:58
- Re: T-shirts?, Mark Atwood, 09:30
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 09:16
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht, Joe Abley, 09:12
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht, Jaap Akkerhuis, 09:05
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht, Theodore Tso, 08:50
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht, Andrew Sullivan, 08:41
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht, Basil Dolmatov, 08:40
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht, Ole Jacobsen, 08:32
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht, Ole Jacobsen, 08:29
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht, Michael Dillon, 06:38
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht, Robert Kisteleki, 04:55
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 04:42
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht, Marco Davids (Prive), 03:16
- Re: T-shirts?, Paul Ferguson, 02:06
- Re: T-shirts?, Ole Jacobsen, 02:03
- Re: T-shirts?, Fred Baker, 01:56
- Re: T-shirts?, Lars Eggert, 01:20
March 29, 2010
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Stefan Santesson, 22:30
- Re: [77all] No Host for IETF 77, Dave CROCKER, 10:42
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht, Spencer Dawkins, 10:24
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht, Janet P Gunn, 06:29
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht, Henk Uijterwaal, 05:29
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht, Carsten Bormann, 05:17
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 05:06
- RE: T-shirts?, Dave Cridland, 04:53
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht, Henk Uijterwaal, 03:07
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht, Carsten Bormann, 01:52
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht, yao, 01:10
March 28, 2010
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht, Melinda Shore, 22:45
- RE: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht, Greg Daley, 22:40
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht, Chris Elliott, 22:04
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht, Julian Reschke, 21:44
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht, Michael Richardson, 21:38
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht, Richard Barnes, 20:55
- Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 17:57
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Julian Reschke, 13:38
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-eai-mailinglist (Mailing Lists and Internationalized Email Addresses) to Experimental RFC, SM, 12:43
- Re: [77all] No Host for IETF 77, Mark Townsley, 11:27
March 27, 2010
- Re: T-shirts?, Scott Brim, 15:10
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes, jean-michel bernier de portzamparc, 11:00
- RE: T-shirts?, Christian Huitema, 10:22
- Re: T-shirts?, todd glassey, 08:47
- Re: T-shirts?, Ray Pelletier, 06:41
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes, MtFBwU, 00:19
March 26, 2010
- Re: Above market hotel room rates, Steven Bellovin, 20:02
- T-shirts?, Gregory Lebovitz, 19:09
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Martin Rex, 18:18
- Re: Last Call: draft-haberman-rpsl-reachable-test (An RPSL Interface Id for Operational Testing) to Proposed Standard, Denis Walker, 14:51
- Re: [Autoconf] Last Call: draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model (IP Addressing Model in Ad Hoc Networks) to Informational RFC, Jari Arkko, 13:40
- Re: [Autoconf] Last Call: draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model (IP Addressing Model in Ad Hoc Networks) to Informational RFC, Erik Nordmark, 13:24
- Registration Operations Mail List, Edward Lewis, 13:05
- Re: [Autoconf] Last Call: draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model (IP Addressing Model in Ad Hoc Networks) to Informational RFC, Jari Arkko, 13:04
- Re: Above market hotel room rates, joel jaeggli, 11:02
- Re: Above market hotel room rates, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 10:55
March 25, 2010
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: Above market hotel room rates, Samuel Weiler, 20:46
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Bill Fenner, 17:38
- Federated Authentication Discussion Tonight at 9 PM in Manhattan room, Sam Hartman, 13:37
- Re: On Day Passes.., David Morris, 11:20
- Re: On Day Passes.., Julian Reschke, 10:56
- Re: Above market hotel room rates, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:29
- Re: On Day Passes.., Ole Jacobsen, 09:41
- Re: On Day Passes.., David Morris, 09:27
- Re: On Day Passes.., Spencer Dawkins, 09:25
- Re: On Day Passes.., David Morris, 09:20
- Re: On Day Passes.., Yoav Nir, 07:36
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Yoav Nir, 07:24
- Re: On Day Passes.., Dave Cridland, 06:05
- Re: On Day Passes.., Dave Cridland, 06:04
- Re: On Day Passes.., Spencer Dawkins, 05:08
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Stefan Santesson, 02:03
- Audio archives, Ulrich Herberg, 01:39
March 24, 2010
- Re: On Day Passes.., David Morris, 21:23
- 回复:Re: On Day Passes.., songhaibin 64081, 21:18
- Re: On Day Passes.., Marshall Eubanks, 21:16
- Re:RE: On Day Passes.., songhaibin 64081, 21:15
- Re: On Day Passes.., Melinda Shore, 21:12
- Re: On Day Passes.., Marshall Eubanks, 21:11
- Re: On Day Passes.., David Morris, 21:10
- RE: On Day Passes.., Ed Juskevicius, 21:08
- NroffEdit updated with December 2009 boilerplate, Stefan Santesson, 21:06
- On Day Passes.., Danny McPherson, 21:00
- Re: Above market hotel room rates, Samuel Weiler, 19:59
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Julian Reschke, 19:11
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Julian Reschke, 19:10
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Stefan Santesson, 19:02
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Stefan Santesson, 18:56
- Re: Gentle drumming before plenaries this week..., Lucy Lynch, 17:39
- Re: [Autoconf] Last Call: draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model (IP Addressing Model in Ad Hoc Networks) to Informational RFC, Alexandru Petrescu, 17:36
- Gentle drumming before plenaries this week..., Spencer Dawkins, 17:35
- Re: Bar Bof on Federated Authentication Thursday at 9 PM during IETF week, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 17:09
- Re: [Autoconf] Last Call: draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model (IP Addressing Model in Ad Hoc Networks) to Informational RFC, Teco Boot, 17:08
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 17:08
- Re: Above market hotel room rates, pjnesser, 17:07
- Above market hotel room rates, Samuel Weiler, 17:07
- Re: Above market hotel room rates, Adrian Farrel, 16:55
- Re: Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-ietf-ipfix-export-per-sctp-stream-06, Benoit Claise, 16:05
- RE: Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-ietf-ipfix-export-per-sctp-stream-06, Romascanu, Dan (Dan), 15:37
- Re: Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-ietf-ipfix-export-per-sctp-stream-06, Ben Campbell, 15:29
- Re: Above market hotel room rates, Lou Berger, 15:00
- Re: [Autoconf] Last Call: draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model (IP Addressing Model in Ad Hoc Networks) to Informational RFC, Ryuji Wakikawa, 14:57
- Re: Above market hotel room rates, Bob Hinden, 14:44
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes, Alessandro Vesely, 14:26
- Re: Bar Bof on Federated Authentication Thursday at 9 PM during IETF week, Leif Johansson, 13:22
- Re: Above market hotel room rates, joel jaeggli, 13:19
- Re: Above market hotel room rates, Dave CROCKER, 13:09
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes, todd glassey, 12:51
- Re: Above market hotel room rates, Dave Cridland, 12:33
- Re: Above market hotel room rates, Lou Berger, 12:26
- Re: Above market hotel room rates, Spencer Dawkins, 11:57
- Re: Above market hotel room rates, Marshall Eubanks, 11:40
- Re: Above market hotel room rates, David Conrad, 11:32
- Re: Above market hotel room rates, Paul Hoffman, 11:24
- Re: Above market hotel room rates, Samuel Weiler, 11:19
- Re: Above market hotel room rates, Samuel Weiler, 11:17
- Re: Above market hotel room rates, todd glassey, 11:09
- Re: Above market hotel room rates, Melinda Shore, 10:59
- Re: Above market hotel room rates, Spencer Dawkins, 10:58
- Re: [Autoconf] Last Call: draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model (IP Addressing Model in Ad Hoc Networks) to Informational RFC, Erik Nordmark, 10:55
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes, Alessandro Vesely, 10:53
- Re: Above market hotel room rates, Andrew Sullivan, 10:36
- Re: Above market hotel room rates, Tony Hansen, 10:24
- Re: Above market hotel room rates, Lucy Lynch, 10:09
- Re: Above market hotel room rates, joel jaeggli, 10:09
- Re: Above market hotel room rates, Lou Berger, 10:00
- Re: Above market hotel room rates, Samuel Weiler, 09:58
- Re: Above market hotel room rates, Lou Berger, 09:53
- Re: Above market hotel room rates, Dave CROCKER, 09:34
- Re: Above market hotel room rates, Clint Chaplin, 08:39
- Re: Audio Streaming Update 3/21 - IETF 77 March 21-26, 2010, Marshall Eubanks, 07:49
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-ao-crypto ... -- editorials, Gregory Lebovitz, 03:41
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes, Spencer Dawkins, 03:39
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes, Alessandro Vesely, 03:26
- Re: Above market hotel room rates, Spencer Dawkins, 02:59
- Re: Above market hotel room rates, David Morris, 02:00
- Re: Above market hotel room rates, Donald Eastlake, 01:55
- RE: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes, Greg Daley, 00:08
March 23, 2010
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes, Mark Atwood, 22:16
- Re: Above market hotel room rates, Lou Berger, 21:37
- Above market hotel room rates, Samuel Weiler, 20:44
- Re: Javascript timer for speakers, Lars Eggert, 18:29
- Re: Javascript timer for speakers, Dave Aronson, 18:27
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes, todd glassey, 18:19
- Re: Javascript timer for speakers, Henning Schulzrinne, 17:47
- Javascript timer for speakers, Theodore Ts'o, 17:42
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes, Dean Willis, 16:40
- Re: [77all] No Host for IETF 77, Tony Hansen, 16:29
- Re: [77all] No Host for IETF 77, Spencer Dawkins, 16:19
- Re: [77all] No Host for IETF 77, Fred Baker, 15:22
- Re: [77all] No Host for IETF 77, Yoav Nir, 14:12
- Re: [77all] No Host for IETF 77, todd glassey, 13:03
- Re: Audio Streaming Update 3/21 - IETF 77 March 21-26, 2010, Michael Richardson, 12:34
- Re: [77all] No Host for IETF 77, Donald Eastlake, 12:21
- Re: Bar BoF on Location Coherence Wednesday at 11:30 AM, Richard Barnes, 12:16
- Re: [77all] No Host for IETF 77, Yoav Nir, 11:58
- Re: Audio Streaming Update 3/21 - IETF 77 March 21-26, 2010, Joel Jaeggli, 11:39
- Re: Audio Streaming Update 3/21 - IETF 77 March 21-26, 2010, Michael Richardson, 11:06
- RE: [77all] No Host for IETF 77, DOLLY, MARTIN C (ATTLABS), 10:46
- Re: [NSIS] Last Call: draft-ietf-nsis-rmd (RMD-QOSM - The Resource Management in Diffserv QOS Model) to Experimental RFC, Georgios Karagiannis, 10:46
- Re: [NSIS] Last Call: draft-ietf-nsis-rmd (RMD-QOSM - The Resource Management in Diffserv QOS Model) to Experimental RFC, Gerald Ash, 10:45
- Re: [NSIS] Last Call: draft-ietf-nsis-rmd (RMD-QOSM - The Resource Management in Diffserv QOS Model) to Experimental RFC, Gerald Ash, 10:44
- Re: Audio Streaming Update 3/21 - IETF 77 March 21-26, 2010, Joel Jaeggli, 10:24
- Re: Audio Streaming Update 3/21 - IETF 77 March 21-26, 2010, Joel Jaeggli, 10:12
- Re: Using xml2rfc (was: Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII), Fred Baker, 09:59
- Re: Audio Streaming Update 3/21 - IETF 77 March 21-26, 2010, Michael Richardson, 09:00
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Doug Ewell, 08:37
- Using xml2rfc (was: Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII), Doug Ewell, 08:14
- Re: [77all] No Host for IETF 77, Jari Arkko, 08:08
- Re: Audio Streaming Update 3/21 - IETF 77 March 21-26, 2010, Marshall Eubanks, 05:41
- Re: [77all] No Host for IETF 77, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 03:31
March 22, 2010
- IETF77 Technical Plenary Information, IAB Chair, 21:02
- RE: [77all] No Host for IETF 77, Thomson, Martin, 20:29
- Re: [77all] No Host for IETF 77, Spencer Dawkins, 20:28
- Re: [77all] No Host for IETF 77, Dave CROCKER, 20:19
- Re: [77all] No Host for IETF 77, Jorge Amodio, 20:19
- RE: [77all] No Host for IETF 77, Thomson, Martin, 20:01
- Re: [77all] No Host for IETF 77, Ralph Droms, 19:57
- RE: [77all] No Host for IETF 77, Greg Daley, 19:54
- Re: [77all] No Host for IETF 77, Dave CROCKER, 19:47
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Masataka Ohta, 17:41
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Julian Reschke, 16:59
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Martin Rex, 16:28
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes, Joel Jaeggli, 15:43
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes, Eliot Lear, 15:39
- RE: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes, Christian Huitema, 15:36
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes, Dave Aronson, 14:12
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative, Martin Rex, 13:15
- Re: DHCP retransmission behaviour, David W. Hankins, 12:24
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 11:41
- Re: A state of spin ... presented in ASCII, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 11:41
- DHCP retransmission behaviour, Lorenzo Ruggiero, 11:40
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative, Dave Cridland, 08:34
- RE: A state of spin ... presented in ASCII, Wes Beebee (wbeebee), 07:58
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes, Alessandro Vesely, 07:05
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 03:32
- RE: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes, Greg Daley, 01:39
March 21, 2010
- RE: Gen-ART LC/Tekechat Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-10, Thomson, Martin, 20:14
- RE: Gen-ART LC/Tekechat Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-10, Thomson, Martin, 20:14
- RE: Gen-ART LC/Tekechat Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-10, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo), 20:13
- RE: Gen-ART LC/Tekechat Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-10, Thomson, Martin, 20:13
- Re: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words, Samuel Weiler, 20:12
- Re: [NSIS] Last Call: draft-ietf-nsis-rmd (RMD-QOSM - The Resource Management in Diffserv QOS Model) to Experimental RFC, Georgios Karagiannis, 20:12
- Re: [NSIS] Last Call: draft-ietf-nsis-rmd (RMD-QOSM - The Resource Management in Diffserv QOS Model) to Experimental RFC, Georgios Karagiannis, 20:11
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 20:11
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 20:10
- Re: [NSIS] Last Call: draft-ietf-nsis-rmd (RMD-QOSM - The Resource Management in Diffserv QOS Model) to Experimental RFC, Gerald Ash, 20:10
- Re: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words (Definitions for expressing standards requirements in IANA registries.) to BCP, Samuel Weiler, 20:09
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02 (and what time is it), Phillip Hallam-Baker, 20:08
- Re: On the IAB technical advice on the RPKI, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 20:08
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 20:07
- Re: On the IAB technical advice on the RPKI, Danny McPherson, 20:07
- Re: On the IAB technical advice on the RPKI, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 20:07
- 3D Technology Comes to Military and Security Forces, Casey Farrell, 20:06
- Re: Gen-ART LC/Tekechat Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-10, Ben Campbell, 20:05
- Re: Gen-ART LC/Tekechat Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-10, Ben Campbell, 20:05
- Re: Gen-ART LC/Tekechat Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-10, Ben Campbell, 20:04
- Re: IETF-77 Clouds bar BoF at 11:30 AM on Thursday, 3/25/2010, Bhumip Khasnabish, 20:04
- IETF-77 Clouds bar BoF at 11:30 AM on Thursday, 3/25/2010, Bhumip Khasnabish, 20:03
- Re: A state of spin ... presented in ASCII, Doug Ewell, 17:08
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Doug Ewell, 17:02
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Masataka Ohta, 16:39
- Re: A state of spin ... presented in ASCII, Masataka Ohta, 16:31
- Wednesday Plenary Preparation, IETF Chair, 16:30
- Data points with screenshots, on specification publishing formats, Tim Bray, 16:10
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Doug Ewell, 16:08
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Masataka Ohta, 15:59
- Re: Gen-ART LC/Tekechat Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-10, Ben Campbell, 13:10
- RE: Gen-ART LC/Tekechat Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-10, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo), 12:36
- Re: Periodic debates, Sean Turner, 12:33
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Julian Reschke, 11:51
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative, Julian Reschke, 11:51
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Julian Reschke, 11:50
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Julian Reschke, 11:49
- Audio Streaming Update 3/21 - IETF 77 March 21-26, 2010, Joel Jaeggli, 10:57
- Re: A state of spin ... presented in ASCII, Doug Ewell, 09:59
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Masataka Ohta, 06:51
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Andrew Sullivan, 05:07
March 20, 2010
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative, Donald Eastlake, 19:31
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative, Yoav Nir, 19:01
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative, Yoav Nir, 19:00
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Tony Hansen, 18:11
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Bob Braden, 17:59
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative, Bob Braden, 17:49
- Re: A state of spin ... presented in ASCII, Michael Dillon, 15:40
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative, Tim Bray, 13:29
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative, Donald Eastlake, 13:18
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative, Michael Dillon, 10:51
- Re: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2bis-08.txt, Paul Hoffman, 10:33
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative, Michael Dillon, 08:49
- Re: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2bis-08.txt, Elwyn Davies, 08:04
- Re: A state of spin ... presented in ASCII, Masataka Ohta, 06:43
- Re: A state of spin ... presented in ASCII, SM, 05:22
March 19, 2010
- Re: On the IAB technical advice on the RPKI, Masataka Ohta, 22:50
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes, Dave Aronson, 21:22
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes, Dave Aronson, 20:56
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Masataka Ohta, 19:10
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Martin Rex, 18:45
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Melinda Shore, 18:38
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Martin Rex, 18:26
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative, Martin Rex, 18:15
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative, Randy Presuhn, 17:15
- Re: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words, Martin Rex, 17:03
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative, Peter Saint-Andre, 16:57
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Andrew Sullivan, 16:52
- Re: A state of spin ... presented in ASCII, Masataka Ohta, 16:46
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative, Martin Rex, 16:33
- Re: A state of spin ... presented in ASCII, todd glassey, 15:47
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 15:39
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Bob Braden, 15:39
- Re: A state of spin ... presented in ASCII, Masataka Ohta, 15:07
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes, Jerome Benoit, 14:51
- Re: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words (Definitions for expressing standards requirements in IANA registries.) to BCP, Brian E Carpenter, 14:06
- secdir review/last call comments for : draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words, Sam Hartman, 13:49
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Michael Dillon, 13:09
- Re: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words (Definitions for expressing standards requirements in IANA registries.) to BCP, Olafur Gudmundsson, 12:59
- Re: Regd ospfASBdrRtrStatus, Chris Elliott, 12:33
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, todd glassey, 12:25
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Henning Schulzrinne, 12:11
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes, Joe Baptista, 11:31
- Re: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words (Definitions for expressing standards requirements in IANA registries.) to BCP, Paul Hoffman, 11:15
- Re: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2bis-08.txt, Paul Hoffman, 11:01
- A state of spin ... presented in ASCII (was: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII), SM, 11:01
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 10:42
- ISOC Accepting IETF Fellowship Applications, Steve Conte, 09:39
- Gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2bis-08.txt, Elwyn Davies, 09:35
- Re: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words (Definitions for expressing standards requirements in IANA registries.) to BCP, Olafur Gudmundsson, 09:33
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Ole Jacobsen, 09:10
- Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes, MtFBwU, 09:03
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Masataka Ohta, 08:07
- Regd ospfASBdrRtrStatus, Raj kiran, 07:11
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Dave Cridland, 06:03
- Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 05:29
- Re: IPV6, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 04:35
- Fw: IPV6, piyush dwivedi, 04:17
- IPV6, piyush dwivedi, 04:16
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 03:50
March 18, 2010
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, John Levine, 23:06
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, John Levine, 22:58
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Tim Bray, 20:04
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Tony Finch, 19:49
- Re: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words (Definitions for expressing standards requirements in IANA registries.) to BCP, John C Klensin, 17:13
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Mark Andrews, 16:37
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Marc Petit-Huguenin, 16:04
- Re: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words (Definitions for expressing standards requirements in IANA registries.) to BCP, Brian E Carpenter, 15:55
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Julian Reschke, 15:52
- Re: [Sip] Last Call: draft-ietf-sip-ipv6-abnf-fix (Essential correction for IPv6 ABNF and URI comparison in RFC3261) to Proposed Standard, Brian E Carpenter, 15:48
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Marshall Eubanks, 15:46
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 15:43
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Julian Reschke, 15:38
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 15:26
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Alfredo Dal´Ava Júnior, 15:20
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Julian Reschke, 15:00
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02 (and what time is it), Tony Finch, 14:26
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 14:26
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Tony Finch, 14:22
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Tony Finch, 14:12
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02 (and what time is it), Patrik Fältström, 14:10
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02 (and what time is it), Marshall Eubanks, 14:04
- Re: On the IAB technical advice on the RPKI, Danny McPherson, 13:37
- Re: On the IAB technical advice on the RPKI, Stephen Kent, 13:27
- Re: [Sip] Last Call: draft-ietf-sip-ipv6-abnf-fix (Essential correction for IPv6 ABNF and URI comparison in RFC3261) to Proposed Standard, Cullen Jennings, 13:12
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, John R. Levine, 13:05
- Re: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words (Definitions for expressing standards requirements in IANA registries.) to BCP, SM, 12:44
- Re: On the IAB technical advice on the RPKI, Stephen Kent, 12:33
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Michael Edward McNeil, 12:06
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Bob Braden, 11:50
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02 (and what time is it), Patrik Fältström, 11:47
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Ofer Inbar, 11:45
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Marshall Eubanks, 11:38
- RE: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words (Definitions for expressing standards requirements in IANA registries.) to BCP, Christian Huitema, 11:31
- Re: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words (Definitions for expressing standards requirements in IANA registries.) to BCP, Paul Hoffman, 11:24
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Dave Cridland, 11:23
- Re: Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-ietf-ipfix-export-per-sctp-stream-06, Benoit Claise, 11:02
- Re: [NSIS] Last Call: draft-ietf-nsis-rmd (RMD-QOSM - The Resource Management in Diffserv QOS Model) to Experimental RFC, Georgios Karagiannis, 11:00
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:59
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:59
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, YAO Jiankang, 10:58
- RE: What day is 2010-01-02, HUANG, JERRY (ATTLABS), 10:58
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:57
- Comments on draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words-03, Edward Lewis, 09:59
- Re: Last Call: draft-haberman-rpsl-reachable-test (An RPSL Interface Id for Operational Testing) to Proposed Standard, Larry Blunk, 09:39
- Re: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words (Definitions for expressing standards requirements in IANA registries.) to BCP, John C Klensin, 09:27
- Re: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words (Definitions for expressing standards requirements in IANA registries.) to BCP, Andrew Sullivan, 09:15
- Re: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words (Definitions for expressing standards requirements in IANA registries.) to BCP, John C Klensin, 09:01
- RE: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words (Definitionsfor expressing standards requirements in IANA registries.) to BCP, Dearlove, Christopher (UK), 08:49
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Alfredo Dal´Ava Júnior, 08:26
- Re: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words (Definitions for expressing standards requirements in IANA registries.) to BCP, Andrew Sullivan, 08:25
- Re: Last Call: draft-haberman-rpsl-reachable-test (An RPSL Interface Id for Operational Testing) to Proposed Standard, Vesna Manojlovic, 06:49
- [IETF] If document formats were radios was:Towards consensus on document format, Michel Py, 00:23
March 17, 2010
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Joel Jaeggli, 22:01
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Richard Barnes, 20:43
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Loa Andersson, 20:22
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Stewart Bryant, 20:14
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Cullen Jennings, 20:07
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Tony Hansen, 20:04
- Re: I-Ds are not RFCs, was Why the normative form of IETF Standards, John Levine, 19:39
- Re: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words (Definitions for expressing standards requirements in IANA registries.) to BCP, Paul Hoffman, 19:34
- Re: Bar BoF on Location Coherence Wednesday at 11:30 AM, James M. Polk, 19:13
- Re: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words (Definitions for expressing standards requirements in IANA registries.) to BCP, Brian E Carpenter, 19:10
- Re: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words (Definitions for expressing standards requirements in IANA registries.) to BCP, SM, 18:13
- Re: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words (Definitions for expressing standards requirements in IANA registries.) to BCP, Paul Hoffman, 18:12
- Bar BoF on Location Coherence Wednesday at 11:30 AM, Richard Barnes, 18:11
- Re: On the IAB technical advice on the RPKI, Masataka Ohta, 17:03
- Re: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words (Definitions for expressing standards requirements in IANA registries.) to BCP, Brian E Carpenter, 15:44
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Michael Edward McNeil, 15:02
- RE: Towards consensus on document format, Michel Py, 14:31
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Bob Hinden, 14:31
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 11:20
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, John R. Levine, 11:19
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Lars Eggert, 11:18
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Michael Edward McNeil, 11:02
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 10:49
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 10:29
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Robert Kisteleki, 10:27
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Yao Jiankang, 10:26
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-isms-dtls-tm-09.txt, Wes Hardaker, 10:25
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:25
- Change in ISOC Panel Topic for Tuesday at IETF 77, IETF Chair, 09:09
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 08:15
March 16, 2010
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, tytso, 22:06
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Bill McQuillan, 21:59
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Doug Ewell, 20:12
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Doug Ewell, 20:05
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, tytso, 19:35
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, David Morris, 19:06
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Marshall Eubanks, 18:43
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Sam Hartman, 17:28
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Jorge Amodio, 17:00
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Jorge Amodio, 17:00
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Masataka Ohta, 16:41
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 16:24
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Douglas Otis, 16:07
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, SM, 11:33
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Richard Barnes, 10:21
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Marshall Eubanks, 10:15
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:15
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, JFC Morfin, 10:14
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:13
- Re: On the IAB technical advice on the RPKI, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:13
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:12
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:11
- Re: Periodic debates, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:11
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:10
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:10
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:09
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Ole Jacobsen, 09:50
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Tony Hansen, 09:49
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Dave CROCKER, 09:39
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Julian Reschke, 09:38
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Julian Reschke, 08:22
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Doug Ewell, 08:14
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 08:00
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Doug Ewell, 07:34
March 15, 2010
- Review of draft-ietf-isms-dtls-tm-09.txt, Bernard Aboba, 22:17
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Masataka Ohta, 21:51
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Brian E Carpenter, 20:19
- RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-radext-status-server (Use of Status-Server Packets in the Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS) Protocol) to Informational RFC, Bernard Aboba, 20:13
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Masataka Ohta, 19:30
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Julian Reschke, 18:57
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Masataka Ohta, 18:43
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Masataka Ohta, 18:39
- Gen-ART (belated) LC Review of draft-ietf-nsis-nslp-natfw-23, Ben Campbell, 18:27
- Re: On the IAB technical advice on the RPKI, Masataka Ohta, 18:25
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Julian Reschke, 18:15
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Masataka Ohta, 18:03
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Julian Reschke, 16:39
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Julian Reschke, 16:35
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Julian Reschke, 16:22
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Martin Rex, 16:20
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Masataka Ohta, 16:09
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Julian Reschke, 15:37
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Martin Rex, 15:33
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Martin Rex, 15:02
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Joe Touch, 13:30
- Re: Periodic debates, Dave CROCKER, 13:25
- Re: Periodic debates, Jorge Amodio, 12:38
- Periodic debates, Dave CROCKER, 11:50
- RE: Towards consensus on document format, Doug Ewell, 11:44
- RE: Internet wins 2010 Nobel Peace Prize..., Dearlove, Christopher (UK), 11:41
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Julian Reschke, 11:23
- Internet wins 2010 Nobel Peace Prize..., todd glassey, 11:19
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, todd glassey, 11:17
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, todd glassey, 11:14
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Julian Reschke, 11:07
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Marc Petit-Huguenin, 11:02
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, todd glassey, 11:01
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Julian Reschke, 10:59
- Re: Towards consensus on document format, Melinda Shore, 10:54
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Robert Kisteleki, 10:39
- Re: Comments on appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set., Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:30
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:30
- Re: Comments on appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set., Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:29
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:29
- On the IAB technical advice on the RPKI, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:28
- RE: What day is 2010-01-02, John C Klensin, 10:27
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, John C Klensin, 10:27
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:26
- Towards consensus on document format, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:26
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Marc Petit-Huguenin, 10:25
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, David A. Bryan, 10:24
March 14, 2010
- Re: Audio Streaming Info - IETF 77 March 21-26, 2010, Marshall Eubanks, 20:05
- Re: Audio Streaming Info - IETF 77 March 21-26, 2010, Dave CROCKER, 19:55
- Re: Audio Streaming Info - IETF 77 March 21-26, 2010, Michael Richardson, 19:31
- Audio Streaming Info - IETF 77 March 21-26, 2010, Joel Jaeggli, 16:21
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Tim Bray, 14:27
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Jari Arkko, 13:51
- Re: Error in Security Considerations in an RFC, Joel Jaeggli, 13:51
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Jari Arkko, 13:50
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Dave CROCKER, 13:49
- Re: Error in Security Considerations in an RFC, todd glassey, 12:49
- Re: Error in Security Considerations in an RFC, David Morris, 12:10
- Re: Error in Security Considerations in an RFC, Russ Housley, 11:23
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Sabahattin Gucukoglu, 05:07
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Julian Reschke, 04:33
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Julian Reschke, 04:29
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Jari Arkko, 01:59
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Jari Arkko, 01:25
March 13, 2010
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Masataka Ohta, 20:48
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Doug Ewell, 20:09
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Michael Richardson, 19:54
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Brian E Carpenter, 19:16
- RE: What day is 2010-01-02, Phillips, Addison, 18:57
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Doug Ewell, 18:40
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Joel Jaeggli, 18:11
- RE: What day is 2010-01-02, Phillips, Addison, 18:09
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Mark Andrews, 16:50
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Masataka Ohta, 16:39
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Marshall Eubanks, 16:34
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Ofer Inbar, 16:24
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Mark Andrews, 16:18
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Marshall Eubanks, 16:10
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Scott Brim, 15:58
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Phillips, Addison, 14:22
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Tony Finch, 14:12
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Francois D. Menard, 13:18
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Julian Reschke, 13:15
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 12:33
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Doug Ewell, 12:31
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 12:29
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Cullen Jennings, 12:07
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Doug Ewell, 12:04
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Tony Finch, 11:29
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Doug Ewell, 11:08
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 10:13
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Julian Reschke, 09:48
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Cullen Jennings, 09:25
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Donald Eastlake, 09:19
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, John C Klensin, 09:17
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Robert Kisteleki, 09:16
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, bill manning, 09:14
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Scott Brim, 09:09
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Julian Reschke, 09:07
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02, Marshall Eubanks, 09:07
- What day is 2010-01-02, Cullen Jennings, 08:52
- Re: Error in Security Considerations in an RFC, SM, 03:44
- Error in Security Considerations in an RFC, Florian Weimer, 02:35
March 12, 2010
- Retorical question: How do I pay for my registration?, David Morris, 18:40
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, ned+ietf, 17:01
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Julian Reschke, 16:29
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Martin Rex, 16:20
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Masataka Ohta, 16:15
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Julian Reschke, 16:07
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Rich Kulawiec, 15:54
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 15:54
- Re: FW: Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-yang (YANG - A data modeling languagefor NETCONF) to Proposed Standard, Graham Klyne, 15:53
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Julian Reschke, 15:36
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Mark Andrews, 15:26
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Masataka Ohta, 15:16
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Julian Reschke, 15:15
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Martin Rex, 15:12
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Tim Bray, 15:06
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Julian Reschke, 14:46
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Masataka Ohta, 14:43
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Julian Reschke, 13:35
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Martin Rex, 13:20
- IETF 80 in Prague, Ray Pelletier, 12:49
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Martin Rex, 12:44
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Andrew Sullivan, 10:43
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Julian Reschke, 10:35
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Martin Rex, 10:11
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Doug Ewell, 08:29
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Doug Ewell, 07:38
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 06:51
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Dave Cridland, 06:33
- RE: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Dearlove, Christopher (UK), 04:05
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Ingemar Johansson S, 03:24
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Julian Reschke, 02:06
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Stefan Winter, 01:53
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Stefan Winter, 01:17
- Re: Comments on appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set., Douglas Otis, 00:53
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, David Morris, 00:35
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Tim Bray, 00:27
March 11, 2010
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, John Levine, 23:59
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Masataka Ohta, 23:26
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Donald Eastlake, 22:38
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Doug Ewell, 20:22
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Henrik Levkowetz, 20:13
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Doug Ewell, 20:12
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Martin Rex, 18:11
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Jorge Amodio, 16:25
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Jorge Amodio, 16:24
- RE: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Eric Gray, 16:24
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Masataka Ohta, 16:23
- Re: Comments on appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set., Brian E Carpenter, 15:19
- Re: Comments on appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set., Sam Hartman, 15:02
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Huub van Helvoort, 14:58
- Re: Comments on appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set., Andrew Sullivan, 14:40
- Re: Comments on appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set., Brian E Carpenter, 14:16
- Re: Comments on appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set., Dave CROCKER, 13:49
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Julian Reschke, 13:46
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Jorge Amodio, 13:12
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Julian Reschke, 12:40
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Mark Atwood, 11:47
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Tim Bray, 11:46
- Comments on appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set., Andrew Sullivan, 11:41
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Julian Reschke, 11:38
- Re: Appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set., Stephen Farrell, 11:06
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Jorge Amodio, 11:05
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Martin Rex, 11:03
- Re: Appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set., Henrik Levkowetz, 10:49
- RE: [77attendees] High Assurance Cryptographic API Bar BoF at IETF 77 in Anaheim, CA, Novikov, Lev, 10:36
- Re: Appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set, RJ Atkinson, 10:35
- Re: Appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set., Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:34
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-isms-dtls-tm (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Transport Model for SNMP) to Proposed Standard, Wes Hardaker, 10:34
- Re: [Isms] Last Call: draft-ietf-isms-dtls-tm (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Transport Model for SNMP) to Proposed Standard, Robert Story, 10:33
- RE: Bar Bof on Federated Authentication Thursday at 9 PM during IETF week, Thomas Hardjono, 10:32
- RE: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Richard Shockey, 10:14
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Andrew Sullivan, 09:52
- Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Donald Eastlake, 09:33
- Re: Appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set., SM, 09:09
- Internet Registration Bar BOF Update, Edward Lewis, 08:00
- Namespace requirements, was: Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-yang (YANG - A data modeling language for NETCONF) to Proposed Standard, Julian Reschke, 07:41
- Re: Appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set., Eliot Lear, 02:35
- Re: Appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set., Stephane Bortzmeyer, 02:28
- Appeal Support ... was Re: Appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set., Olaf Kolkman, 02:06
- Re: Appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set., Bert (IETF) Wijnen, 01:50
March 10, 2010
- Re: Appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set., John Levine, 23:07
- Re: Appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set., ned+ietf, 22:24
- Re: [Emu] Bar Bof on Federated Authentication Thursday at 9 PM during IETF week, Dave CROCKER, 20:38
- Re: Appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set., Brian E Carpenter, 18:35
- Re: Appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set., David Kessens, 18:10
- Re: Appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set., Dave CROCKER, 17:42
- Re: Appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set., Ted Hardie, 17:35
- Re: Appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set., Russ Housley, 17:28
- Re: Appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set., Ted Hardie, 17:21
- Appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set., Russ Housley, 16:43
- Re: Bar Bof on Federated Authentication Thursday at 9 PM during IETF week, todd glassey, 16:37
- Re: [Emu] Bar Bof on Federated Authentication Thursday at 9 PM during IETF week, Steven Bellovin, 13:04
- Re: [77attendees] High Assurance Cryptographic API Bar BoF at IETF 77 in Anaheim, CA, Meadhbh Hamrick, 12:30
- Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-10.txt, Russ Mundy, 12:29
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-randomization (Part #1), Mark Allman, 12:29
- High Assurance Cryptographic API Bar BoF at IETF 77 in Anaheim, CA, Novikov, Lev, 12:28
- Re: Bar Bof on Federated Authentication Thursday at 9 PM during IETF week, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 12:27
- Re: [Emu] Bar Bof on Federated Authentication Thursday at 9 PM during IETF week, Dave Nelson, 12:26
March 09, 2010
- Re: Bar Bof on Federated Authentication Thursday at 9 PM during IETF week, Ole Jacobsen, 19:12
- Re: Bar Bof on Federated Authentication Thursday at 9 PM during IETF week, Melinda Shore, 18:58
- RE: Bar Bof on Federated Authentication Thursday at 9 PM during IETF week, Glen Zorn, 18:52
- Gen-ART LC/Tekechat Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-10, Ben Campbell, 17:03
- Bar Bof on Federated Authentication Thursday at 9 PM during IETF week, Sam Hartman, 10:12
March 08, 2010
- comments on draft-maglione-radext-ipv6-acct-extensions-01, Glen Zorn, 23:14
- Archiving legacy text files, Michelle Cotton, 20:42
- Request for input and participation, Andrew Sullivan, 13:04
- Re: No Host for IETF 77 meeting in Anaheim, California, todd glassey, 11:31
- Re: [IPsec] IETFLC comments for draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2bis-08, Raj Singh, 10:58
- Re: [IPsec] IETFLC comments for draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2bis-08, Tero Kivinen, 10:41
- Re: [IPsec] IETFLC comments for draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2bis-08, Tero Kivinen, 10:41
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dnsext-axfr-clarify-13, Alfred Hönes, 10:40
- Re: [IPsec] IETFLC comments for draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2bis-08, Paul Hoffman, 09:21
- Re: Last Call: draft-duerst-mailto-bis (The 'mailto' URI Scheme) to Proposed Standard, "Martin J. Dürst", 04:11
- RE: [IPsec] IETFLC comments for draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2bis-08, Pasi.Eronen, 01:17
March 04, 2010
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: REVISED Last Call: draft-turner-asymmetrickeyformat, Sean Turner, 18:56
- Re: REVISED Last Call: draft-turner-asymmetrickeyformat (Asymmetric Key Packages) to Proposed Standard, Cullen Jennings, 16:36
- Re: [DNSOP] Internet Registration Bar BOF announcement, Edward Lewis, 11:00
- Re: [DNSOP] Internet Registration Bar BOF announcement, Tony Finch, 10:55
- Re: Internet Registration Bar BOF announcement, Edward Lewis, 09:49
- Re: Internet Registration Bar BOF announcement, Tony Finch, 09:43
- Internet Registration Bar BOF announcement, Edward Lewis, 07:07
March 03, 2010
- No Host for IETF 77 meeting in Anaheim, California, IETF Chair, 15:20
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-randomization (Part #1), Gorry Fairhurst, 10:52
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-randomization (Part #1), Alfred Hönes, 10:51
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-randomization (Transport Protocol Port Randomization Recommendations) to BCP, SM, 01:55
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-randomization (Part #1), James M. Polk, 00:12
March 02, 2010
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-randomization (Part #1), Fernando Gont, 23:05
- Re: [NSIS] Last Call: draft-ietf-nsis-rmd (RMD-QOSM - The Resource Management in Diffserv QOS Model) to Experimental RFC, Georgios Karagiannis, 17:06
- Re: [NSIS] Last Call: draft-ietf-nsis-rmd (RMD-QOSM - The Resource Management in Diffserv QOS Model) to Experimental RFC, Gerald Ash, 17:05
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS), Masataka Ohta, 14:30
- Re: ietf 1id_guidelines tool broken, William Allen Simpson, 11:40
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS), Shumon Huque, 11:26
- RE: Patent disclosure in draft-shin-augmented-pake-00.txt, SeongHan Shin, 10:42
- RE: [NSIS] Last Call: draft-ietf-nsis-rmd (RMD-QOSM - The ResourceManagement in Diffserv QOS Model) to Experimental RFC, Georgios Karagiannis, 10:41
- Re: Announcing Clouds bar BoF during IETF-77 (March, 2010, Anaheim, CA), Phillip Hallam-baker, 10:41
- Re: [NSIS] Last Call: draft-ietf-nsis-rmd (RMD-QOSM - The Resource Management in Diffserv QOS Model) to Experimental RFC, Gerald Ash, 10:39
March 01, 2010
- Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-ietf-ipfix-export-per-sctp-stream-06, Ben Campbell, 17:50
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS), Masataka Ohta, 16:15
- Patent disclosure in draft-shin-augmented-pake-00.txt, Simon Josefsson, 15:53
- PKIgate, Masataka Ohta, 15:43
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS), Wassim Haddad, 15:22
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS), Masataka Ohta, 15:14
- IETF Workshop on Broadband Home Gateways, IESG Secretary, 14:30
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS), Paul Wouters, 12:37
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS), Tony Finch, 11:46
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS), David Conrad, 11:20
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS), Joe Baptista, 10:36
- Last Call: draft-harkins-emu-eap-pwd (EAP Authentication Using Only A Password) to Informational RFC, Dorothy Stanley, 10:09
- Re: ietf 1id_guidelines tool broken, William Allen Simpson, 09:59
- Re: Gen-ART review for draft-ietf-ipsecme-esp-null-heuristics-05.txt, Tero Kivinen, 09:59
- ietf 1id_guidelines tool broken, William Allen Simpson, 09:55
- Re: ietf 1id_guidelines tool broken, William Allen Simpson, 09:42
- Re: ietf 1id_guidelines tool broken, William Allen Simpson, 09:41
- Re: ietf 1id_guidelines tool broken, William Allen Simpson, 09:41
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS), Phillip Hallam-Baker, 09:39
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS), Phillip Hallam-Baker, 09:38
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS), Phillip Hallam-Baker, 09:37
- RE: [tcpm] Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-auth-opt (The TCP Authentication Option) to Proposed Standard, Smith, Donald, 09:36
- RE: [tcpm] Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-auth-opt (The TCP Authentication Option) to Proposed Standard, Smith, Donald, 09:34
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsext-axfr-clarify (DNS Zone Transfer Protocol (AXFR)) to Proposed Standard, Alfred Hönes, 09:34