That would meet most of my issues, provided of course that the XML2RFC
format was published.
Zero time spent going to an editable format is better than any amount
of 'easy conversion'.
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:03 PM, Tony Hansen <tony(_at_)att(_dot_)com> wrote:
+1
On 3/17/2010 12:18 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
If we could agree that the final XML was authoritative, and if
necessary let them hire someone to fix xmlrfc so it can produce the
text version without hand editing or postprocessing, that would be a
big step forward.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
--
--
New Website: http://hallambaker.com/
View Quantum of Stupid podcasts, Tuesday and Thursday each week,
http://quantumofstupid.com/
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf