I was not under the impression from reading rate-control that that document
was modifying 3265 to prevent notifiers from sending an empty notify. But,
your suggestion is a reasonable one. Reading the rate-control text you
quoted earlier in the thread could lead to the impression that this is the
case. I've added the rate control authors to the thread.
I don't think it modifies 3265 in general, but it does seem to normatively
prevent empty NOTIFY requests as a result of a max-interval expiration.
Agreed. Some clarification on this point would be useful.
Ietf mailing list