On May 7, 2010, at 10:12 AM, John C Klensin wrote:
And, yes, a regular IETF participant who attended the last
meeting on a day pass should have been able to know whether that
would count for the Nomcom qualification or not. But nothing
prevented a person in that position from asking the question
before he or she registered, in which case we would,
appropriately, have had this discussion prior to Anaheim.
Well, being such a person, before I registered for a day pass I did not
consider the NOMCOM ramifications. If I had, I think it would likely that I
would simply have assumed the existing BCP were in force.
I argue that what the IETF now proposes is not a clarification to the BCP but a
change to the BCP. Applying such changes retroactively stinks.
So, I guess I won't have NOMCOM eligible this year (due to the change, assuming
I attend the next IETF under a full registration).
-- Kurt
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf