IETF Discussion (date)
September 30, 2010
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Brian E Carpenter, 22:40
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, James M. Polk, 22:14
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Brian E Carpenter, 21:59
- Re: Pigeon flies past broadband in data speed race, Mark Nottingham, 21:43
- Re: [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-upstream (MPLS Upstream Label Assignment for LDP) to Proposed Standard, Eric Rosen, 14:32
September 29, 2010
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, John C Klensin, 17:55
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-avt-rapid-acquisition-for-rtp-15.txt> (Unicast-Based Rapid Acquisition of Multicast RTP Sessions) to Proposed Standard, Ali C. Begen (abegen), 16:49
- Re: [ietf] DNS spoofing at captive portals, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 16:48
- Save-the-Date: ISOC(_at_)IETF 79 Briefing Panel, Kevin Craemer, 16:47
- Re: Re-routing, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 16:47
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, RJ Atkinson, 16:46
- further discussion of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Peter Saint-Andre, 11:49
- Re: Abandoning draft-ietf-simple-interdomain-scaling-analysis, Cullen Jennings, 10:10
- Re: Abandoning draft-ietf-simple-interdomain-scaling-analysis, Peter Saint-Andre, 09:16
- Re: Abandoning draft-ietf-simple-interdomain-scaling-analysis, Stephen Farrell, 08:58
- Abandoning draft-ietf-simple-interdomain-scaling-analysis, Gonzalo Camarillo, 08:48
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-avt-rapid-acquisition-for-rtp-15.txt> (Unicast-Based Rapid Acquisition of Multicast RTP Sessions) to Proposed Standard, Magnus Westerlund, 08:00
September 28, 2010
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Thomas Narten, 18:55
- US government and IPv6 (was US DoD and IPv6), Scott O. Bradner, 18:45
- Re: [ietf] DNS spoofing at captive portals, Mark Andrews, 16:27
- Re: Re-routing, David Morris, 16:20
- Re: Re-routing, Richard L. Barnes, 13:18
- Re-routing, Ole Jacobsen, 13:12
- RIM to Host IETF 81 in Quebec City, IETF Administrative Director, 10:23
- Re: [ietf] DNS spoofing at captive portals, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:21
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:19
- Re: [ietf] DNS spoofing at captive portals, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:18
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Thomas Narten, 08:22
- Re: [ietf] DNS spoofing at captive portals, Tony Finch, 03:23
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Joel Jaeggli, 02:52
September 27, 2010
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Ole Jacobsen, 23:39
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Brian E Carpenter, 22:40
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Brian E Carpenter, 21:20
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Marshall Eubanks, 19:59
- US DoD and IPv6, Noel Chiappa, 18:32
- IAOC Administrative Procedure Published, Bob Hinden, 13:46
- Re: [ietf] DNS spoofing at captive portals, bill manning, 11:33
- Re: [Roll] Last Call: <draft-ietf-roll-rpl-11.txt> IPR Concern, Cullen Jennings, 09:51
- Re: [ietf] DNS spoofing at captive portals, Tony Finch, 09:48
- Re: IETF-meta (was: Fisking vs Top-Posting), Dave Cridland, 09:46
- Re: [ietf] DNS spoofing at captive portals, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 09:41
- Re: [ietf] DNS spoofing at captive portals, bmanning, 09:40
- Re: [ietf] DNS spoofing at captive portals, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 09:40
- Re: [ietf] DNS spoofing at captive portals, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 09:39
- IETF-meta (was: Fisking vs Top-Posting), Richard L. Barnes, 09:38
- Re: Posting Placement (was Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting), Olaf Kolkman, 03:22
- Re: [ietf] DNS spoofing at captive portals, W.C.A. Wijngaards, 02:51
September 24, 2010
- Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting, Michael Richardson, 20:54
- Re: [ietf] DNS spoofing at captive portals, John R. Levine, 20:33
- Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting, John C Klensin, 20:21
- Re: [ietf] DNS spoofing at captive portals, bill manning, 20:11
- Re: [ietf] DNS spoofing at captive portals, John Levine, 19:17
- Re: [ietf] DNS spoofing at captive portals, John R. Levine, 17:35
- Re: [ietf] DNS spoofing at captive portals, Steven Bellovin, 16:47
- Re: [ietf] DNS spoofing at captive portals, John Levine, 16:17
- Re: [ietf] DNS spoofing at captive portals, Keith Moore, 14:47
- Re: [ietf] DNS spoofing at captive portals, Paul Hoffman, 14:05
- Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting, Tony Finch, 13:21
- Re: [ietf] DNS spoofing at captive portals, Livingood, Jason, 13:18
- Re: Posting Placement (was Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting), Marshall Eubanks, 11:13
- Re: [ietf] DNS spoofing at captive portals, Richard L. Barnes, 11:01
- Re: [ietf] DNS spoofing at captive portals, Alfred Hönes, 10:53
- Re: [TLS] [certid] [secdir] secdir review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-09, Marsh Ray, 10:52
- Re: [certid] Why require EKU for certid?, Henry B. Hotz, 10:52
- Posting Placement (was Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting), Joel M. Halpern, 10:37
- Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting, Randy Dunlap, 10:18
- Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting, John C Klensin, 08:09
- DNS spoofing at captive portals, Michael Richardson, 06:21
- Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting, Tony Finch, 05:51
- Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting, Sabahattin Gucukoglu, 01:40
September 23, 2010
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:54
- Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting, Keith Moore, 18:35
- Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting, Jari Arkko, 18:21
- Re: Pigeon flies past broadband in data speed race, Jorge Amodio, 14:49
- Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting, David Morris, 13:25
- Re: [TLS] [certid] review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-09, Martin Rex, 13:17
- Re: [TLS] [certid] [secdir] secdir review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-09, Richard L. Barnes, 13:13
- Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting, Randy Dunlap, 12:44
- RE: [TLS] Why require EKU for certid?, Jim Schaad, 12:39
- Re: [TLS] [certid] review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-09, Marsh Ray, 12:38
- Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting, George Michaelson, 12:37
- Re: [certid] review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-09, Henry B. Hotz, 12:36
- Re: [TLS] [certid] [secdir] secdir review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-09, Marsh Ray, 12:35
- Re: [TLS] [certid] [secdir] secdir review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-09, Jeffrey A. Williams, 12:35
- Re: [TLS] [certid] [secdir] secdir review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-09, Marsh Ray, 12:34
- Re: [certid] [secdir] secdir review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-09, ArkanoiD, 12:33
- Re: [certid] Why require EKU for certid?, Martin Rex, 11:14
- Re: Pigeon flies past broadband in data speed race, Olaf Kolkman, 11:08
September 22, 2010
- Re: Nomcom 2010-2011: READ THIS: Important Information on OpenDisclosure, Spencer Dawkins, 22:24
- Re: [certid] review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-09, Martin Rex, 20:48
- Re: Nomcom 2010-2011: READ THIS: Important Information on Open Disclosure, Dave CROCKER, 19:33
- RE: Nomcom 2010-2011: READ THIS: Important Information on Open Disclosure, Thomas Walsh, 17:38
- RE: Nomcom 2010-2011: READ THIS: Important Information on Open Disclosure, John E Drake, 17:17
- RE: All these discussions about meeting venues, Ole Jacobsen, 17:11
- RE: Nomcom 2010-2011: READ THIS: Important Information on Open Disclosure, Ross Callon, 16:02
- Re: Nomcom 2010-2011: READ THIS: Important Information on Open Disclosure, SM, 15:44
- Re: Nomcom 2010-2011: READ THIS: Important Information on Open Disclosure, Jari Arkko, 15:26
- Re: Nomcom 2010-2011: READ THIS: Important Information on Open Disclosure, todd glassey, 15:19
- RE: All these discussions about meeting venues, Randall Gellens, 15:15
- RE: Nomcom 2010-2011: READ THIS: Important Information on Open Disclosure, Thomas Walsh, 15:07
- Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting, Keith Moore, 14:36
- RE: Nomcom 2010-2011: READ THIS: Important Information on Open Disclosure, Ross Callon, 14:31
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, Randall Gellens, 14:12
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, Randall Gellens, 14:08
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, Randall Gellens, 14:07
- RFP: Requirements Development for Working Group Charter Tools, IETF Administrative Director, 14:00
- Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting, Tony Finch, 13:48
- Re: Nomcom 2010-2011: READ THIS: Important Information on Open Disclosure, John C Klensin, 13:42
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-09, Peter Saint-Andre, 13:19
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-09, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 13:14
- Re: secdir review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-09, Peter Saint-Andre, 13:12
- Re: Nomcom 2010-2011: READ THIS: Important Information on Open Disclosure, todd glassey, 13:02
- Re: Why require EKU for certid?, Peter Saint-Andre, 12:59
- Re: [certid] Fwd: secdir review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-09, Barry Leiba, 12:48
- RE: [Isis-wg] Fwd: Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-isis-bfd-tlv (IS-IS BFD EnabledTLV) to Proposed Standard, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg), 12:48
- Re: Nomcom 2010-2011: READ THIS: Important Information on Open Disclosure, Dave CROCKER, 12:47
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-12.txt>, Arnaud Ebalard, 12:46
- Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 12:45
- RE: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-storm-ifcp-ipn133-updates-02, david.black, 12:44
- Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting, t.petch, 12:36
- Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting, Dave Cridland, 12:22
- Re: [certid] Fwd: secdir review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-09, Peter Saint-Andre, 12:18
- Re: review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-09, Peter Saint-Andre, 12:10
- Why require EKU for certid?, Paul Hoffman, 11:45
- RE: All these discussions about meeting venues, Christer Holmberg, 11:41
- Re: secdir review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-09, Barry Leiba, 11:35
- Re: Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Peter Saint-Andre, 11:34
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, Randall Gellens, 11:32
- Re: Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Peter Saint-Andre, 11:22
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Randall Gellens, 11:16
- Re: secdir review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-09, Peter Saint-Andre, 10:59
- Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting, Keith Moore, 10:58
- Review of draft-gundavelli-v6ops-l2-unicast, Bernard Aboba, 10:45
- Re: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-storm-ifcp-ipn133-updates-02, Joe Touch, 09:53
- Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting, Jari Arkko, 08:27
- Draft new version: draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch [was: secdir review of draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch], Christer Holmberg, 04:26
- For Information: Fourth International Conference on Internet Technologies and Applications, md(_at_)ictmakreting(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk, 04:23
September 21, 2010
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-12.txt>, james woodyatt, 22:43
- Re: Nomcom 2010-2011: Open disclosure of willing nominees, Brian E Carpenter, 21:13
- Re: Nomcom 2010-2011: READ THIS: Important Information on Open Disclosure, Bob Hinden, 19:02
- Re: Nomcom 2010-2011: READ THIS: Important Information on Open Disclosure, John C Klensin, 18:30
- Re: Nomcom 2010-2011: READ THIS: Important Information on Open Disclosure, Stephen Farrell, 18:14
- Re: Nomcom 2010-2011: READ THIS: Important Information on Open Disclosure, Dave Cridland, 18:10
- Re: Nomcom 2010-2011: READ THIS: Important Information on Open Disclosure, Brian E Carpenter, 17:21
- Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting, J.D. Falk, 16:42
- tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-storm-ifcp-ipn133-updates-02, Joe Touch, 13:02
- RFP: Requirements Development for Community Draft Tracking Tool, IETF Administrative Director, 12:59
- Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting, Martin Rex, 12:55
- Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting, Dave Cridland, 12:44
- Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting, Ole Jacobsen, 12:01
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-12.txt>, Arnaud Ebalard, 11:46
- Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting, Polk, William T., 11:46
- Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting, Wes Hardaker, 11:45
- Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 11:44
- FW: Nomcom 2010-2011: READ THIS: Important Information on Open Disclosure, Thomas Walsh, 11:35
- Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting, Randy Dunlap, 10:29
- Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting, Jorge Amodio, 09:48
- Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting, Keith Moore, 09:41
- Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting, todd glassey, 07:52
- Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting, todd glassey, 07:50
- Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting, Jorge Amodio, 07:16
- Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting, Sabahattin Gucukoglu, 06:55
- Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting, Nathaniel Borenstein, 03:45
September 20, 2010
- Re: Discussion of draft-hardie-advance-mechanics-00.txt, Keith Moore, 22:29
- FW: Nomcom 2010-2011: Open disclosure of willing nominees, Thomas Walsh, 21:12
- Re: Discussion of draft-hardie-advance-mechanics-00.txt, John Leslie, 19:58
- Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting, Randy Dunlap, 19:04
- Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting, John Leslie, 18:59
- Re: Discussion of draft-hardie-advance-mechanics-00.txt, Ted Hardie, 18:01
- Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting, Scott Brim, 17:50
- Re: Discussion of draft-hardie-advance-mechanics-00.txt, Keith Moore, 17:14
- Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting, Dave Cridland, 17:08
- RE: secdir review of draft-ietf-opsec-igp-crypto-requirements, Bhatia, Manav (Manav), 16:43
- Fisking vs Top-Posting, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 16:42
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-nsis-nslp-auth-06, RJ Atkinson, 16:40
- Re: Discussion of draft-hardie-advance-mechanics-00.txt, ned+ietf, 16:03
- Re: Discussion of draft-hardie-advance-mechanics-00.txt, Keith Moore, 13:35
- Re: Discussion of draft-hardie-advance-mechanics-00.txt, Martin Rex, 10:52
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-nsis-nslp-auth-06, Lars Eggert, 09:09
September 17, 2010
- Re: Discussion of draft-hardie-advance-mechanics-00.txt, Ted Hardie, 18:11
- Re: Discussion of draft-hardie-advance-mechanics-00.txt, SM, 15:42
- Re: draft-gennai-smime-cnipa-pec-08, SM, 13:24
- Re: draft-gennai-smime-cnipa-pec-08, John C Klensin, 11:37
- Re: Discussion of draft-hardie-advance-mechanics-00.txt, Keith Moore, 09:52
- Re: draft-gennai-smime-cnipa-pec-08, Alexey Melnikov, 05:41
- Re: draft-gennai-smime-cnipa-pec-08, Alexey Melnikov, 05:33
- Re: draft-gennai-smime-cnipa-pec-08, Alessandro Vesely, 03:45
- Re: IAOC volunteers (Re: NomCom 2010-2011: Call for More Nominations), t.petch, 03:32
- Re: IAOC volunteers (Re: NomCom 2010-2011: Call for More Nominations), Henk Uijterwaal, 00:35
September 16, 2010
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: Discussion of draft-hardie-advance-mechanics-00.txt, Ted Hardie, 23:45
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, Martin Rex, 22:52
- Re: Discussion of draft-hardie-advance-mechanics-00.txt, Joel M. Halpern, 20:13
- RE: Discussion of draft-hardie-advance-mechanics-00.txt, Thomson, Martin, 20:03
- Re: Discussion of draft-hardie-advance-mechanics-00.txt, Ted Hardie, 19:54
- Re: IAOC volunteers (Re: NomCom 2010-2011: Call for More Nominations), Marshall Eubanks, 19:47
- RE: Discussion of draft-hardie-advance-mechanics-00.txt, Thomson, Martin, 19:41
- Re: Discussion of draft-hardie-advance-mechanics-00.txt, Paul Hoffman, 19:36
- Re: IAOC volunteers (Re: NomCom 2010-2011: Call for More Nominations), Ole Jacobsen, 19:34
- IAOC volunteers (Re: NomCom 2010-2011: Call for More Nominations), Martin Rex, 19:14
- FW: NomCom 2010-2011: Call for More Nominations, Thomas Walsh, 18:32
- Discussion of draft-hardie-advance-mechanics-00.txt, Ted Hardie, 18:26
- Re: Pigeon flies past broadband in data speed race, Richard Bennett, 18:13
- Re: Pigeon flies past broadband in data speed race, Marshall Eubanks, 17:10
- Re: Pigeon flies past broadband in data speed race, Jorge Amodio, 16:57
- Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-opsec-igp-crypto-requirements, Joel Jaeggli, 13:32
- Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic?, Jorge Amodio, 12:44
- Pigeon flies past broadband in data speed race, Ole Jacobsen, 12:31
- Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic?, Dave Aronson, 12:23
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, Alfred Hönes, 11:47
- RE: secdir review of draft-ietf-opsec-igp-crypto-requirements, Bhatia, Manav (Manav), 11:46
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, Patrik Faltstrom (pfaltstr), 11:45
- Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic?, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 11:44
- Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic?, Dave CROCKER, 11:43
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, Dave CROCKER, 11:42
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, Dave CROCKER, 11:41
- Re: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard, Alexandru Petrescu, 10:53
- Re: Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, t.petch, 10:17
September 15, 2010
- Re: draft-gennai-smime-cnipa-pec-08, SM, 23:17
- RE: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-06, Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP], 21:12
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, Ole Jacobsen, 19:03
- Re: draft-gennai-smime-cnipa-pec-08, John C Klensin, 18:57
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, Richard L. Barnes, 18:33
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, Huub van Helvoort, 17:17
- Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic?, Richard Bennett, 17:06
- Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic?, Bob Hinden, 17:00
- RE: All these discussions about meeting venues, Christer Holmberg, 16:56
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, Benjamin Niven-Jenkins, 16:40
- Re: draft-gennai-smime-cnipa-pec-08, John Levine, 16:31
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, Michael Dillon, 16:30
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, Michael Dillon, 16:10
- draft-gennai-smime-cnipa-pec-08, SM, 16:00
- Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic?, Richard Bennett, 14:16
- Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic?, Bob Hinden, 14:04
- secdir review of draft-ietf-opsec-igp-crypto-requirements, Samuel Weiler, 13:14
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, Ole Jacobsen, 12:20
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, Andrew Sullivan, 11:56
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, Ole Jacobsen, 11:44
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, Ole Jacobsen, 11:41
- Re: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard, Hesham Soliman, 11:20
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-06, Alfred Hönes, 11:19
- Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic?, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 11:19
- Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic?, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 11:17
- Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic?, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 11:17
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, Dave CROCKER, 11:16
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, Dave CROCKER, 11:15
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, Dave CROCKER, 11:14
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, Dave CROCKER, 11:13
- RE: All these discussions about meeting venues, Fleischman, Eric, 11:12
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, Henk Uijterwaal, 01:26
- RE: All these discussions about meeting venues, Glen Zorn, 01:22
September 14, 2010
- Re: Time Shifting of Internet Traffic, Richard Bennett, 22:34
- Re: Time Shifting of Internet Traffic, Richard L. Barnes, 22:26
- Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic?, Richard Bennett, 20:46
- Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic?, Richard Bennett, 19:08
- Re: Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Peter Saint-Andre, 17:17
- Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic?, Brian E Carpenter, 16:57
- Re: Time Shifting of Internet Traffic, Brian E Carpenter, 16:48
- Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-06, Richard L. Barnes, 14:53
- RE: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard, Laganier, Julien, 14:25
- Re: [certid] Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Dave Cridland, 13:45
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, Ole Jacobsen, 12:50
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, Michael Dillon, 12:28
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, Ole Jacobsen, 12:10
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, Michael Dillon, 11:59
- Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic?, Bob Braden, 11:33
- Re: NAT behavior for IP ID field, Stephen Kent, 11:21
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, Janet P Gunn, 11:19
- Re: [certid] review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-09, Sean Turner, 11:14
- Re: [certid] review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-09, Peter Saint-Andre, 11:13
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, Ole Jacobsen, 11:04
- Re: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard, Behcet Sarikaya, 11:02
- Re: Time Shifting of Internet Traffic, Ben Niven-Jenkins, 10:55
- Re: [certid] Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Shumon Huque, 10:45
- Fw: Next steps with draft-ietf-opsawg-mpls-tp-oam-def, Adrian Farrel, 10:28
- Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic?, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:17
- Time Shifting of Internet Traffic, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:15
- review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-09, Wes Hardaker, 10:14
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, Dave CROCKER, 10:13
- Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic?, Florian Weimer, 10:12
- Re: Last Call: draft-cridland-acap-vendor-registry (The Internet Assigned Number Authority (IANA) Application Configurations Access Protocol (ACAP) Vendor Subtrees Registry) to Proposed Standard, Dave Cridland, 06:52
- Re: Last Call: draft-cridland-acap-vendor-registry (The Internet Assigned Number Authority (IANA) Application Configurations Access Protocol (ACAP) Vendor Subtrees Registry) to Proposed Standard, Dave Cridland, 06:21
- BOFs for IETF-79, Jari Arkko, 05:09
- Re: Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Dave Cridland, 02:59
- Re: Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Stefan Santesson, 01:51
- Re: Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Stefan Santesson, 01:42
September 13, 2010
- Re: Registration of media type application/calendar+xml, Keith Moore, 23:23
- Re: Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Peter Saint-Andre, 22:33
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, Martin Rex, 20:11
- Re: Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Stefan Santesson, 19:04
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, Mary Barnes, 18:12
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, David Morris, 17:14
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, Fred Baker, 16:53
- Re: Registration of media type application/calendar+xml, ned+ietf, 16:13
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-12.txt> (Recommended Simple Security Capabilities in Customer Premises Equipment for Providing Residential IPv6 Internet Service) to Informational RFC, Laganier, Julien, 15:51
- RE: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard, Laganier, Julien, 15:41
- Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic?, todd glassey, 15:21
- Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic?, Michael StJohns, 15:19
- Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic?, Richard Bennett, 15:17
- Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic?, Noel Chiappa, 15:04
- Re: Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Dave Cridland, 14:30
- Re: Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Peter Saint-Andre, 14:22
- Re: Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Dave Cridland, 14:18
- Re: Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Peter Saint-Andre, 14:17
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Martin Rex, 14:15
- Re: [certid] Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Dave Cridland, 14:13
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, Melinda Shore, 14:03
- Re: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard, Hesham Soliman, 13:54
- Re: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard, Hesham Soliman, 13:53
- Re: Registration of media type application/calendar+xml, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 13:52
- Re: Latest Development in DiffServ Wars, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 13:51
- Re: [certid] Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Peter Saint-Andre, 13:50
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, George Michaelson, 13:49
- Re: Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Peter Saint-Andre, 13:49
- Re: Revised IAOC Administrative Procedures draft, Dave CROCKER, 13:47
- Re: Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Stefan Santesson, 13:42
- Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic?, todd glassey, 13:26
- Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic?, Marshall Eubanks, 13:19
- Re: [certid] Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Stefan Santesson, 12:59
- Re: Revised IAOC Administrative Procedures draft, Steve Crocker, 12:32
- Re: Revised IAOC Administrative Procedures draft, Marshall Eubanks, 12:17
- Re: Revised IAOC Administrative Procedures draft, Bob Hinden, 12:13
- Re: Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Dave Cridland, 12:06
- Re: [certid] Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Shumon Huque, 12:05
- Re: Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Peter Saint-Andre, 12:04
- Re: [certid] Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Richard L. Barnes, 12:03
- Re: Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Shumon Huque, 11:53
- Re: Revised IAOC Administrative Procedures draft, Adrian Farrel, 11:41
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, Bob Hinden, 11:26
- Re: [certid] Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Peter Saint-Andre, 11:18
- Re: [certid] Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Paul Hoffman, 11:17
- Re: Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Peter Saint-Andre, 11:08
- Re: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard, Behcet Sarikaya, 10:56
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, Mary Barnes, 10:54
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, Mary Barnes, 10:25
- Re: Revised IAOC Administrative Procedures draft, Bob Hinden, 01:26
September 12, 2010
- RE: All these discussions about meeting venues, Glen Zorn, 21:12
- Re: Revised IAOC Administrative Procedures draft, Ole Jacobsen, 17:17
- Re: All these discussions about meeting venues, Michael Dillon, 17:11
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent, ned+ietf, 16:37
- Re: Revised IAOC Administrative Procedures draft, Brian E Carpenter, 15:37
- secdir review of draft-ietf-grow-mrt, Richard L. Barnes, 14:04
- Re: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard, Alexandru Petrescu, 10:28
- Re: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard, Alexandru Petrescu, 09:52
- Re: Revised IAOC Administrative Procedures draft, Henk Uijterwaal, 09:21
- Re: Revised IAOC Administrative Procedures draft, Adrian Farrel, 08:23
September 11, 2010
- RE: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard, Wassim Haddad, 18:39
- Re: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard, Wassim Haddad, 11:51
- Re: Registration of media type application/calendar+xml, Keith Moore, 09:27
- Re: Registration of media type application/calendar+xml, Nathaniel Borenstein, 07:42
- Re: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard, Alexandru Petrescu, 07:23
September 10, 2010
- Re: Registration of media type application/calendar+xml, Keith Moore, 23:56
- Re: Latest Development in DiffServ Wars, Richard Bennett, 17:55
- Re: Latest Development in DiffServ Wars, Bob Hinden, 17:44
- Re: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard, Alexandru Petrescu, 16:27
- RE: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard, Laganier, Julien, 16:18
- Re: NAT behavior for IP ID field, Fernando Gont, 16:00
- Re: Registration of media type application/calendar+xml, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 14:09
- Re: Registration of media type application/calendar+xml, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 14:09
- Re: Registration of media type application/calendar+xml, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 14:08
- Re: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard, Hesham Soliman, 14:07
- Re: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard, Hesham Soliman, 14:06
- Re: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard, Hesham Soliman, 14:05
- Re: Registration of media type application/calendar+xml, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 14:00
- Re: Latest Development in DiffServ Wars, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 13:56
- Re: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard, Hesham Soliman, 13:51
- Re: Registration of media type application/calendar+xml, Dave CROCKER, 13:48
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Dave CROCKER, 13:47
- Re: The Evils of Informational RFC's, Dave CROCKER, 13:43
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Dave CROCKER, 13:43
- Re: Registration of media type application/calendar+xml, Keith Moore, 12:44
- Re: Registration of media type application/calendar+xml, ned+ietf, 12:41
- Re: Registration of media type application/calendar+xml, Peter Saint-Andre, 12:40
- Re: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard, Alexandru Petrescu, 12:40
- Re: Registration of media type application/calendar+xml, Keith Moore, 12:22
- RE: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard, Laganier, Julien, 11:57
- Re: Registration of media type application/calendar+xml, Cyrus Daboo, 11:50
- Re: Registration of media type application/calendar+xml, Keith Moore, 11:45
- Re: Registration of media type application/calendar+xml, Cyrus Daboo, 11:12
- Re: Registration of media type application/calendar+xml, Julian Reschke, 11:05
- Re: Revised IAOC Administrative Procedures draft, Bob Hinden, 11:00
- Re: Registration of media type application/calendar+xml, ned+ietf, 10:42
- Re: Registration of media type application/calendar+xml, Julian Reschke, 10:00
- Re: Registration of media type application/calendar+xml, Cyrus Daboo, 09:46
- Re: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard, Alexandru Petrescu, 09:35
- Re: Registration of media type application/calendar+xml, Cyrus Daboo, 09:24
- Re: Registration of media type application/calendar+xml, Keith Moore, 09:09
- Re: Registration of media type application/calendar+xml, Cyrus Daboo, 08:57
- Re: Registration of media type application/calendar+xml, Cyrus Daboo, 08:51
- Re: Registration of media type application/calendar+xml, Cyrus Daboo, 08:41
- Re: Registration of media type application/calendar+xml, Keith Moore, 08:31
- Re: The Evils of Informational RFC's, Jari Arkko, 07:25
- Re: Registration of media type application/calendar+xml, Keith Moore, 07:24
- Re: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard, Alexandru Petrescu, 07:01
- Re: Registration of media type application/calendar+xml, Julian Reschke, 05:12
- Re: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard, Alexandru Petrescu, 04:56
- Re: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard, Alexandru Petrescu, 04:43
- Re: Registration of media type application/calendar+xml, Julian Reschke, 02:51
- Re: Registration of media type application/calendar+xml, Tony Finch, 02:42
- Re: Registration of media type application/calendar+xml, Keith Moore, 00:40
- Re: Registration of media type application/calendar+xml, Keith Moore, 00:09
September 09, 2010
- Re: Registration of media type application/calendar+xml, ned+ietf, 23:54
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: Registration of media type application/calendar+xml, Keith Moore, 21:51
- Re: Registration of media type application/calendar+xml, Cyrus Daboo, 21:22
- Re: Registration of media type application/calendar+xml, Keith Moore, 20:44
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Yoav Nir, 16:17
- Re: Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Martin Rex, 16:12
- Re: [certid] Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Stefan Santesson, 15:57
- Re: The Evils of Informational RFC's, Russ Housley, 15:55
- Re: The Evils of Informational RFC's, Sam Hartman, 15:27
- Re: [certid] Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Shumon Huque, 15:08
- Re: [certid] Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Stefan Santesson, 14:40
- Re: The Evils of Informational RFC's, Bob Braden, 14:34
- Re: [certid] Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Stefan Santesson, 14:31
- Beijing IETF Codesprint, IETF Chair, 14:29
- Re: [certid] Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Shumon Huque, 13:38
- Re: Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Shumon Huque, 13:23
- Re: [certid] Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Shumon Huque, 13:12
- Latest Development in DiffServ Wars, Richard Bennett, 13:10
- Re: Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Peter Saint-Andre, 12:57
- Re: Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Peter Saint-Andre, 12:56
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-nsis-nslp-auth-06, Roland Bless, 11:52
- Re: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard, Hesham Soliman, 10:20
- Re: The Evils of Informational RFC's, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:19
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:19
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:18
- Re: The Evils of Informational RFC's, Kevin Fall, 10:17
- Re: The Evils of Informational RFC's, Dave CROCKER, 10:16
- Re: The Evils of Informational RFC's, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:15
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-nsis-nslp-auth-06, Russ Housley, 09:56
- RE: The Evils of Informational RFC's, Richard Shockey, 07:07
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-roll-rpl-11.txt> (RPL: IPv6 RoutingProtocol for Low power and Lossy Networks) to Proposed Standard, Dearlove, Christopher (UK), 05:54
- Re: The Evils of Informational RFC's, Richard Bennett, 04:29
- RE: secdir review of draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch, Christer Holmberg, 02:13
- Re: The Evils of Informational RFC's, Olaf Kolkman, 02:03
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard, Alexandru Petrescu, 01:34
- Re: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard, Alexandru Petrescu, 01:29
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard, Wassim Haddad, 00:56
September 08, 2010
- Re: The Evils of Informational RFC's, Fred Baker, 20:49
- Re: The Evils of Informational RFC's, David Morris, 20:22
- Re: The Evils of Informational RFC's, Stephen Farrell, 18:47
- Re: Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Stefan Santesson, 18:46
- Re: Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Stefan Santesson, 18:41
- Re: The Evils of Informational RFC's, Brian E Carpenter, 18:38
- Re: The Evils of Informational RFC's, Andrew G. Malis, 18:31
- Re: The Evils of Informational RFC's, Richard L. Barnes, 18:26
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-nsis-nslp-auth-06, Roland Bless, 18:25
- Re: Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Stefan Santesson, 18:01
- Re: Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Peter Saint-Andre, 17:50
- Re: Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Peter Saint-Andre, 17:36
- RE: Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Bernard Aboba, 17:30
- Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch, Ben Campbell, 17:15
- Re: The Evils of Informational RFC's, Richard Bennett, 17:12
- Re: Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Peter Saint-Andre, 17:11
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Richard Bennett, 17:08
- Re: Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Peter Saint-Andre, 17:01
- Re: The Evils of Informational RFC's, Brian E Carpenter, 16:44
- Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch, Ben Campbell, 16:39
- Re: The Evils of Informational RFC's, Jorge Amodio, 16:26
- Re: The Evils of Informational RFC's, Bob Hinden, 16:18
- Re: The Evils of Informational RFC's, Richard L. Barnes, 16:09
- Re: Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Stefan Santesson, 16:08
- Re: I-D Action:draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-09.txt, Stefan Santesson, 15:36
- RE: The Evils of Informational RFC's, Ronald Bonica, 15:33
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Richard Bennett, 15:22
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-06.txt> (On the implementation of the TCP urgent mechanism) to Proposed Standard, Fernando Gont, 15:08
- Re: The Evils of Informational RFC's, Eric Burger, 15:05
- Re: Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Shumon Huque, 14:54
- Re: The Evils of Informational RFC's, Bob Hinden, 14:52
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-06.txt> (On the implementation of the TCP urgent mechanism) to Proposed Standard, Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP], 14:36
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-06.txt> (On the implementation of the TCP urgent mechanism) to Proposed Standard, Bob Braden, 14:02
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Eric Burger, 13:04
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Joel Jaeggli, 12:46
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Joel Jaeggli, 12:32
- Re: Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Stefan Santesson, 12:28
- Re: Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Stefan Santesson, 11:57
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Gene Gaines, 11:56
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Michael Richardson, 11:48
- Re: The Evils of Informational RFC's, Jorge Amodio, 11:35
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 11:34
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-netmod-dsdl-map-07, Ladislav Lhotka, 11:34
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 11:32
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-netmod-dsdl-map-07, Ben Campbell, 11:31
- Re: The Evils of Informational RFC's, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 11:12
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 11:11
- RE: Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Bernard Aboba, 10:45
- Re: The Evils of Informational RFC's, Paul Hoffman, 10:36
- The Evils of Informational RFC's, Eric Burger, 10:03
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard, Alexandru Petrescu, 09:59
- Re: Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Stefan Santesson, 09:24
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Theodore Tso, 06:26
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Richard Bennett, 06:07
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Theodore Tso, 05:58
- Re: Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, t.petch, 04:13
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-roll-rpl-11.txt> (RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low power and Lossy Networks) to Proposed Standard, Alexandru Petrescu, 01:53
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Joel Jaeggli, 01:51
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Mans Nilsson, 00:26
September 07, 2010
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Randall Gellens, 23:53
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-06.txt> (On the implementation of the TCP urgent mechanism) to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 22:39
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-06.txt> (On the implementation of the TCP urgent mechanism) to Proposed Standard, Fernando Gont, 22:12
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Richard Bennett, 21:31
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Keith Moore, 21:21
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Brian E Carpenter, 21:04
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Marshall Eubanks, 20:14
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Michael Richardson, 20:00
- RE: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Ross Callon, 19:42
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Richard Bennett, 19:39
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-06.txt> (On the implementation of the TCP urgent mechanism) to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 19:20
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Marshall Eubanks, 19:18
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Richard Bennett, 19:08
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Marshall Eubanks, 19:05
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Marshall Eubanks, 19:03
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Richard Bennett, 19:02
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Brian E Carpenter, 18:44
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-06.txt> (On the implementation of the TCP urgent mechanism) to Proposed Standard, Fernando Gont, 18:30
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Richard Bennett, 18:26
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Russ Housley, 17:52
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Michael StJohns, 16:51
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Marshall Eubanks, 16:08
- Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-netmod-dsdl-map-07, Ben Campbell, 16:05
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Janet P Gunn, 16:00
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Melinda Shore, 15:56
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent, James M. Polk, 15:47
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Joel Jaeggli, 15:42
- RE: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Worley, Dale R (Dale), 12:55
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Ben Niven-Jenkins, 11:28
- re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-06.txt> (On the implementation of the TCP urgent mechanism) to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 11:10
- Re: MSIG proposal (on-the-fly sigs for ordinary records) Was: DNSSECis hard to get right, Jiankang YAO, 10:53
- Re: [xmpp] Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Bernard Aboba, 10:52
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Dave CROCKER, 10:52
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Patrik Faltstrom (pfaltstr), 10:51
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Hascall Sharp, 10:50
- RE: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Chris Fenton \(Iridescent\), 10:49
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, DOLLY, MARTIN C (ATTLABS), 10:49
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Matthew Ford, 10:48
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Jelte Jansen, 02:56
- MSIG proposal (on-the-fly sigs for ordinary records) Was: DNSSEC is hard to get right, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 02:23
September 06, 2010
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Fernando Gont, 15:44
- RE: Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, Bernard Aboba, 13:49
- Re: Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check, t.petch, 10:14
- RE: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Glen Zorn, 06:59
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Tim Bray, 05:28
- RE: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Xiangsong Cui, 04:54
- RE: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Christer Holmberg, 04:44
- RE: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Glen Zorn, 04:09
- RE: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Glen Zorn, 04:02
- RE: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Christer Holmberg, 02:52
- RE: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Christer Holmberg, 02:42
- RE: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Glen Zorn, 02:21
- RE: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Yoav Nir, 02:06
- RE: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Christer Holmberg, 00:17
September 04, 2010
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Richard Bennett, 18:03
- RE: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Richard Shockey, 17:51
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Richard Bennett, 17:02
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Livingood, Jason, 12:14
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Livingood, Jason, 12:01
- Re: Tools logins -- Aaaargh!, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 10:39
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Randall Gellens, 00:06
September 03, 2010
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Richard Bennett, 18:49
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Brian E Carpenter, 17:54
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Richard Bennett, 17:38
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Brian E Carpenter, 17:12
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Brian E Carpenter, 17:09
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Richard Bennett, 16:34
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Richard Bennett, 15:50
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Richard Bennett, 15:40
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Richard Bennett, 15:14
- RE: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Richard Shockey, 15:11
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Brian E Carpenter, 15:07
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Richard Bennett, 14:58
- RE: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Richard Shockey, 14:54
- RE: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Worley, Dale R (Dale), 14:34
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Ofer Inbar, 14:25
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, John C Klensin, 13:51
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Russ Housley, 12:03
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, David Morris, 11:20
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Marshall Eubanks, 11:08
- Re: [Roll] Last Call: <draft-ietf-roll-rpl-11.txt> (RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low power and Lossy Networks) to Proposed Standard, Michael Richardson, 11:02
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:58
- Re: Tools logins -- Aaaargh!, Henrik Levkowetz, 08:37
- FW: Nomcom 2010-2011: Timeline and Nominations Update, Thomas Walsh, 03:58
- Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch, Gonzalo Camarillo, 02:05
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-roll-rpl-11.txt> (RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low power and Lossy Networks) to Proposed Standard, Pekka Savola, 00:54
September 02, 2010
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- IETF 79 Host Letters of Invitation, Alexa Morris, 17:04
- Re: Is this true?, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 16:52
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Dave CROCKER, 16:51
- Re: My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Brian E Carpenter, 16:21
- My comments to the press about RFC 2474, Russ Housley, 13:02
- RE: secdir review of draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch, Christer Holmberg, 08:38
- RE: secdir review of draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch, Christer Holmberg, 08:21
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Fernando Gont, 04:46
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 04:27
- Re: NAT behavior for IP ID field, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 04:20
- Re: NAT behavior for IP ID field, t.petch, 04:13
- Re: Is this true?, John C Klensin, 03:42
- RE: IETF Attendance by continent, Christer Holmberg, 00:41
September 01, 2010
- Re: Dedicated list for technical discussions, Cullen Jennings, 17:56
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Michael StJohns, 17:39
- Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch, Cullen Jennings, 17:29
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Jari Arkko, 16:07
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Russ Housley, 15:02
- BOF proposals for the next IETF, Jari Arkko, 14:51
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Doug Barton, 13:20
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Joel Jaeggli, 13:06
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Stephan Wenger, 12:21
- Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch, Ted Hardie, 11:54
- Re: DNSSEC, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 11:27
- Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-nsis-nslp-auth-06, Ben Campbell, 11:26
- Re: Is this true?, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 11:25
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Marshall Eubanks, 11:24
- comments on draft-turner-md4-to-historic-03, Simon Josefsson, 10:47
- RE: IETF Attendance by continent, Ross Callon, 10:26
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Marshall Eubanks, 09:56
- Re: NAT behavior for IP ID field, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 04:53
- IPFIX and netflow timestamps, DESCOMBES Thierry, 04:29
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Tobias Gondrom, 04:07
- RE: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Glen Zorn, 02:38
- Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Clint Chaplin, 01:56
- Re: IETF Attendance by continent, Yoav Nir, 01:36