IETF Discussion (date)
October 31, 2010
- Re: [Full-disclosure] IPv6 security myths, Masataka Ohta, 23:13
- Re: More labels for RFCs, Julian Reschke, 10:55
- Re: [Full-disclosure] IPv6 security myths, Hadriel Kaplan, 10:54
- Re: More labels for RFCs, Hadriel Kaplan, 10:51
- Re: Alternate entry document model, Dave CROCKER, 10:49
- Re: [Full-disclosure] IPv6 security myths, TJ, 08:00
- Re: RE: [Full-disclosure] IPv6 security myths, TJ, 07:57
- Re: More labels for RFCs, Julian Reschke, 04:28
- Re: [Full-disclosure] IPv6 security myths, Masataka Ohta, 03:48
- Re: [Full-disclosure] IPv6 security myths, Francis Dupont, 03:23
October 30, 2010
- Re: [Full-disclosure] IPv6 security myths, Masataka Ohta, 23:02
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 22:37
- RE: [Full-disclosure] IPv6 security myths, Michel Py, 22:28
- Re: [Full-disclosure] IPv6 security myths, TJ, 22:12
- Re: what is the problem bis, Keith Moore, 18:37
- Re: what is the problem bis, Keith Moore, 18:30
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Joel Jaeggli, 13:36
- Re: Alternate entry document model, Joel M. Halpern, 13:31
- Re: what is the problem bis, Joel Jaeggli, 11:39
- Re: what is the problem bis, Yoav Nir, 11:26
- Re: Alternate entry document model (was: Re: IETF processes (was Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels)), Yoav Nir, 11:23
- Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch, Hadriel Kaplan, 11:17
- Re: No single problem... (was Re: what is the problem bis), Hadriel Kaplan, 10:17
- Re: No single problem... (was Re: what is the problem bis), Hadriel Kaplan, 09:45
- Re: what is the problem bis, Joel Jaeggli, 08:29
- Re: what is the problem bis, Keith Moore, 06:35
- Re: Alternate entry document model, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 05:00
- Re: Alternate entry document model (was: Re: IETF processes (was Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels)), John C Klensin, 03:39
- Re: No single problem... (was Re: what is the problem bis), John C Klensin, 03:18
- RE: what is the problem bis, Glen Zorn, 03:01
- Re: No single problem... (was Re: what is the problem bis), Phillip Hallam-Baker, 00:01
October 29, 2010
- Re: No single problem... (was Re: what is the problem bis), Melinda Shore, 23:07
- Re: No single problem... (was Re: what is the problem bis), Phillip Hallam-Baker, 20:24
- Re: Alternate entry document model (was: Re: IETF processes (was Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels)), Michael Richardson, 20:15
- Re: No single problem... (was Re: what is the problem bis), Randy Presuhn, 20:03
- Re: No single problem..., John Leslie, 18:46
- No single problem... (was Re: what is the problem bis), Ted Hardie, 18:16
- Re: what is the problem bis, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 17:55
- Re: what is the problem bis, Keith Moore, 17:05
- Re: More labels for RFCs (was: what is the problem bis), Keith Moore, 16:48
- Re: Alternate entry document model (was: Re: IETF processes, Martin Rex, 16:03
- Re: Alternate entry document model (was: Re: IETF processes (was Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels)), Andrew Sullivan, 15:43
- Re: what is the problem bis, Dave CROCKER, 15:23
- Re: Alternate entry document model (was: Re: IETF processes (was Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels)), SM, 15:21
- Re: what is the problem bis, Richard L. Barnes, 15:15
- Re: what is the problem bis, Hadriel Kaplan, 15:07
- Re: More labels for RFCs (was: what is the problem bis), Richard L. Barnes, 14:24
- Re: what is the problem bis, Keith Moore, 13:37
- Alternate entry document model (was: Re: IETF processes (was Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels)), John C Klensin, 13:23
- Re: IETF processes (was Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels), RJ Atkinson, 12:09
- Re: what is the problem bis, Michael Richardson, 11:36
- More labels for RFCs (was: what is the problem bis), Hadriel Kaplan, 11:21
- Re: what is the problem ter, Martin Rex, 10:59
- mgcp conference modification, Andres Miedzowicz, 09:08
- RE: what is the problem ter, John E Drake, 07:33
- what is the problem ter, Keith Moore, 07:14
- Re: what is the problem bis, t.petch, 04:56
October 28, 2010
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: An elephant in the room (was IETF processes (was Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels)), Dave CROCKER, 23:02
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-l3vpn-mvpn-spmsi-joins-01, James M. Polk, 17:38
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-l3vpn-mvpn-spmsi-joins-01, James M. Polk, 14:39
- RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-l3vpn-mvpn-spmsi-joins-01, Mr. James W. Laferriere, 14:38
- Re: An elephant in the room (was IETF processes (was Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels)), Julian Reschke, 14:38
- RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-l3vpn-mvpn-spmsi-joins-01, Adrian Farrel, 14:23
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-l3vpn-mvpn-spmsi-joins-01, Eric Rosen, 14:07
- Re: An elephant in the room (was IETF processes (was Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels)), Dave CROCKER, 13:45
- An elephant in the room (was IETF processes (was Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels)), Ted Hardie, 13:41
- Re: An archive for nerdy t-shirts, Ole Jacobsen, 13:32
- Re: An archive for nerdy t-shirts, Donald Eastlake, 13:30
- Re: IETF processes (was Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels), Eliot Lear, 13:27
- Re: An archive for nerdy t-shirts, Lucy Lynch, 13:23
- Re: An archive for nerdy t-shirts, Ole Jacobsen, 13:16
- An archive for nerdy t-shirts, Paul Hoffman, 13:13
- Re: IETF processes (was Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels), Dave CROCKER, 12:56
- Re: IETF processes (was Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels), Scott Brim, 12:55
- Re: IETF processes (was Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels), Bob Braden, 12:40
- Re: IETF processes (was Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels), Dave CROCKER, 12:29
- IETF processes (was Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels), RJ Atkinson, 11:58
- Re: Document Action: 'ANSI C12.22, IEEE 1703 and MC12.22 TransportOver IP' to Informational RFC, Avygdor Moise, 11:57
- Re: what is the problem bis, Keith Moore, 06:37
- Re: what is the problem bis, Yoav Nir, 04:06
October 27, 2010
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 23:24
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, ned+ietf, 22:27
- Re: what is the problem bis, Keith Moore, 20:58
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Ralph Droms, 20:44
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Ralph Droms, 20:43
- Re: what is the problem bis, Eric Burger, 20:26
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Eric Burger, 20:22
- Re: what is the problem? (was Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels), Eric Burger, 20:15
- RE: what is the problem bis, ned+ietf, 19:30
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 18:34
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Peter Saint-Andre, 18:16
- Re: Travel Tips for leaving or entering the US., Marshall Eubanks, 17:40
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Bob Braden, 17:01
- Re: Document Action: 'ANSI C12.22, IEEE 1703 and MC12.22 TransportOver IP' to Informational RFC, Michael StJohns, 16:59
- RE: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Tony Hain, 16:34
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Yoav Nir, 16:25
- Travel Tips for leaving or entering the US., Richard Shockey, 16:19
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Bob Braden, 15:53
- RE: two independent implementations, Tony Hain, 15:27
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, SM, 14:43
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-l3vpn-mvpn-spmsi-joins-01, James M. Polk, 14:41
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-l3vpn-mvpn-spmsi-joins-01, Eric Rosen, 13:45
- Re: two independent implementations, John Leslie, 13:19
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, David Kessens, 12:10
- Re: two independent implementations (Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels), James M. Polk, 11:41
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Dave CROCKER, 11:36
- RE: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Tony Hain, 11:24
- Re: two independent implementations (Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels), James M. Polk, 11:21
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, ned+ietf, 11:09
- Re: [Full-disclosure] IPv6 security myths, Masataka Ohta, 11:08
- Re: [Full-disclosure] IPv6 security myths, Steven Bellovin, 10:50
- Re: Document Action: 'ANSI C12.22, IEEE 1703 and MC12.22 TransportOver IP' to Informational RFC, Avygdor Moise, 10:49
- Re: Document Action: 'ANSI C12.22, IEEE 1703 and MC12.22 TransportOver IP' to Informational RFC, Avygdor Moise, 10:48
- Re: Document Action: 'ANSI C12.22, IEEE 1703 and MC12.22 TransportOver IP' to Informational RFC, Avygdor Moise, 10:47
- Re: Document Action: 'ANSI C12.22, IEEE 1703 and MC12.22 TransportOver IP' to Informational RFC, Avygdor Moise, 10:46
- Re: Document Action: 'ANSI C12.22, IEEE 1703 and MC12.22 Transport Over IP' to Informational RFC, RJ Atkinson, 10:46
- Re: [79attendees] cell sim card recommendations, YAO Jiankang, 10:45
- Re: [keyassure] WG Review: Keys In DNS (kidns), Jeffrey A. Williams, 10:44
- Re: [keyassure] WG Review: Keys In DNS (kidns), Jeffrey A. Williams, 10:43
- Transitional RFC Series Editor recommendations published, Glenn Kowack, 10:43
- RE: what is the problem bis, Paul Hoffman, 10:14
- Re: [Full-disclosure] IPv6 security myths, Michael Richardson, 10:04
- RE: what is the problem bis, Yoav Nir, 07:58
- Re: Document Action: 'ANSI C12.22, IEEE 1703 and MC12.22 TransportOver IP' to Informational RFC, Ralph Droms, 07:04
- Re: what is the problem bis, Andrew Sullivan, 06:47
- Re: Last Call: <draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns-12.txt> (Multicast DNS) to Proposed Standard, Eliot Lear, 02:41
- Re: Last Call: <draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns-12.txt> (Multicast DNS) to Proposed Standard, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 02:36
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Lars Eggert, 02:22
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Lars Eggert, 02:21
- two independent implementations (Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels), Lars Eggert, 02:16
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-l3vpn-mvpn-spmsi-joins-01, James M. Polk, 00:44
October 26, 2010
- Re: [Full-disclosure] IPv6 security myths, Fernando Gont, 23:26
- Re: what is the problem bis, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 23:03
- Re: cell sim card recommendations, Hui Deng, 21:39
- cell sim card recommendations, Dave CROCKER, 20:58
- Re: Beijing hotel Nikko close to Shangri-La?, Hui Deng, 20:42
- Fwd: [rfc-i] Transitional RFC Editor recommendations published in draft-kowack-rfc-editor-model-v2, Russ Housley, 19:47
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Michael Richardson, 19:42
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 19:39
- Re: [Full-disclosure] IPv6 security myths, Michael Richardson, 19:31
- RE: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Tony Hain, 19:28
- RE: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Tony Hain, 19:16
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Scott O. Bradner, 19:11
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 19:05
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Scott O. Bradner, 18:20
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 18:12
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, John Leslie, 18:10
- Re: [Full-disclosure] IPv6 security myths, Michael Richardson, 18:03
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 18:00
- Re: [Full-disclosure] IPv6 security myths, Michael Richardson, 17:53
- Re: [Full-disclosure] IPv6 security myths, Masataka Ohta, 17:51
- Re: [Full-disclosure] IPv6 security myths, Fernando Gont, 17:50
- Re: Fwd: [Full-disclosure] IPv6 security myths, Masataka Ohta, 17:44
- Re: [Full-disclosure] IPv6 security myths, David Morris, 17:38
- Re: Document Action: 'ANSI C12.22, IEEE 1703 and MC12.22 TransportOver IP' to Informational RFC, Michael Richardson, 17:33
- Re: [Full-disclosure] IPv6 security myths, Michael Richardson, 17:28
- Re: Document Action: 'ANSI C12.22, IEEE 1703 and MC12.22 TransportOver IP' to Informational RFC, Michael StJohns, 17:25
- Re: [Full-disclosure] IPv6 security myths, james woodyatt, 17:24
- Re: [Full-disclosure] IPv6 security myths, Dave CROCKER, 17:23
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Michael Richardson, 17:13
- Re: what is the problem bis, Michael Richardson, 17:13
- Re: [Full-disclosure] IPv6 security myths, Michael Richardson, 17:05
- Re: what is the problem bis, Ofer Inbar, 16:57
- Re: Document Action: 'ANSI C12.22, IEEE 1703 and MC12.22 TransportOver IP' to Informational RFC, Ralph Droms, 16:36
- Re: [Full-disclosure] IPv6 security myths, Fernando Gont, 16:35
- Re: what is the problem bis, Randy Presuhn, 16:34
- Re: [Full-disclosure] IPv6 security myths, Fernando Gont, 16:19
- RE: [Full-disclosure] IPv6 security myths, Tony Hain, 16:10
- RE: Document Action: 'ANSI C12.22, IEEE 1703 and MC12.22 TransportOver IP' to Informational RFC, Michael StJohns, 15:58
- RE: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Tony Hain, 15:54
- Re: [Full-disclosure] IPv6 security myths, Roger Jørgensen, 15:53
- Re: Document Action: 'ANSI C12.22, IEEE 1703 and MC12.22 TransportOver IP' to Informational RFC, Donald Eastlake, 15:42
- Re: what is the problem bis, Keith Moore, 15:18
- Re: what is the problem bis, Keith Moore, 15:06
- Re: WG Review: Keys In DNS (kidns), Simon Josefsson, 15:05
- Re: what is the problem bis, Keith Moore, 15:03
- Re: what is the problem bis, Hadriel Kaplan, 15:02
- Re: what is the problem bis, Keith Moore, 14:59
- RE: what is the problem bis, John C Klensin, 14:48
- Re: WG Review: Keys In DNS (kidns), Simon Josefsson, 14:46
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Ted Hardie, 14:42
- Re: what is the problem bis, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 14:25
- Re: what is the problem bis, John C Klensin, 13:52
- Re: what is the problem bis, Dave CROCKER, 13:40
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Scott O. Bradner, 13:38
- Re: WG Review: Keys In DNS (kidns), Ted Hardie, 13:38
- RE: what is the problem bis, Ross Callon, 13:28
- Re: what is the problem bis, Dave CROCKER, 12:55
- Re: what is the problem bis, Dave CROCKER, 12:49
- Re: what is the problem bis, todd glassey, 12:46
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Keith Moore, 12:44
- Re: what is the problem? (was Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels), Phillip Hallam-Baker, 12:19
- Re: what is the problem bis, Eliot Lear, 12:18
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Martin Rex, 12:06
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Barry Leiba, 12:05
- RE: Call for Community Feedback on Willing Nominees, Thomas Walsh, 11:41
- RE: Document Action: 'ANSI C12.22, IEEE 1703 and MC12.22 TransportOver IP' to Informational RFC, Avygdor Moise, 11:39
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, RJ Atkinson, 11:38
- Gen-ART last call review of draft-ietf-emu-eaptunnel-req-08, Roni Even, 11:38
- Re: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, Peterson, Jon, 11:37
- Re: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, Peterson, Jon, 11:35
- RE: what is the problem bis, Ross Callon, 11:34
- Re: what is the problem bis, Marshall Eubanks, 11:14
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Andrew Sullivan, 11:13
- what is the problem bis, Scott O. Bradner, 11:09
- Re: Document Action: 'ANSI C12.22, IEEE 1703 and MC12.22 Transport Over IP' to Informational RFC, Michael StJohns, 11:05
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Michael Richardson, 10:44
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Michael Richardson, 10:44
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, John Leslie, 09:47
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Julian Reschke, 09:40
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Dave CROCKER, 09:32
- Re: Fwd: [Full-disclosure] IPv6 security myths, Fernando Gont, 09:16
- what is the problem? (was Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels), Scott O. Bradner, 09:10
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Scott O. Bradner, 07:42
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Russ Housley, 07:36
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Scott O. Bradner, 07:00
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Eric Burger, 05:12
- Re: Document Action: 'ANSI C12.22, IEEE 1703 and MC12.22 Transport Over IP' to Informational RFC, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 04:48
- Re: Beijing hotel Nikko close to Shangri-La?, Huub van Helvoort, 04:46
- Re: Beijing hotel Nikko close to Shangri-La?, Alexandru Petrescu, 04:27
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Bert (IETF) Wijnen, 03:16
October 25, 2010
- Audio Streaming Info - IETF 79 Beijing, November 7-12, 2010, Joel Jaeggli, 23:43
- RE: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Ross Callon, 22:41
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, James M. Polk, 22:37
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Scott O. Bradner, 21:48
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, John Levine, 21:44
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Keith Moore, 21:31
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Eric Burger, 19:38
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Brian E Carpenter, 19:35
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Barry Leiba, 19:23
- Re: draft-iab-dns-applications, Bernard Aboba, 18:44
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Russ Housley, 17:27
- Gen-ART last call review of draft-ietf-emu-eaptunnel-req-08, Roni Even, 16:28
- Re: Document Action: 'ANSI C12.22, IEEE 1703 and MC12.22 Transport Over IP' to Informational RFC, Michael StJohns, 12:40
- RE: Beijing hotel Nikko close to Shangri-La?, Worley, Dale R (Dale), 11:30
- Re: Beijing hotel Nikko close to Shangri-La?, Ole Jacobsen, 10:23
- Beijing hotel Nikko close to Shangri-La?, Alexandru Petrescu, 10:04
- Re: Fwd: [Full-disclosure] IPv6 security myths, Masataka Ohta, 07:49
- Re: Call for Community Feedback on Willing Nominees, t.petch, 07:14
- Fwd: [Full-disclosure] IPv6 security myths, Sabahattin Gucukoglu, 06:31
October 23, 2010
- Re: Extending the Datatracker to display user-specific lists of drafts, Paul Hoffman, 12:04
- Re: Extending the Datatracker to display user-specific lists of drafts, Paul Hoffman, 11:54
- Re: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, Bernie Hoeneisen, 10:01
- Re: Extending the Datatracker to display user-specific lists of drafts, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 04:44
- Re: Extending the Datatracker to display user-specific lists of drafts, Julian Reschke, 04:28
- Re: Extending the Datatracker to display user-specific lists of drafts, Fred Baker, 00:31
October 22, 2010
- Extending the Datatracker to display user-specific lists of drafts, Paul Hoffman, 16:52
- Re: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, Masataka Ohta, 16:06
- Re: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, Martin Rex, 14:45
- Re: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, todd glassey, 11:05
- Re: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, Peterson, Jon, 10:00
- Re: IDNA 2008 Question Re: "Confusable" Characters In Domain Names, Andrew Sullivan, 07:53
- Re: IDNA 2008 Question Re: "Confusable" Characters In Domain Names, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 05:43
- IDNA 2008 Question Re: "Confusable" Characters In Domain Names, john daw, 05:33
- Re: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, Ray Bellis, 02:27
October 21, 2010
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:56
- Re: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, Mark Andrews, 19:06
- Re: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, John Levine, 17:43
- IDnits and RFCdiff Tools, IETF Chair, 16:11
- Re: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 14:35
- Re: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, Masataka Ohta, 14:20
- Re: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, Martin Rex, 13:01
- Re: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, Lawrence Conroy, 10:10
- Re: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, Martin Rex, 09:58
- RE: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, Richard Shockey, 09:37
- Re: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 06:58
- Re: [Simple] Last Call: draft-ietf-simple-msrp-acm (An Alternative Connection Model for the Message Session Relay Protocol (MSRP)) to Proposed Standard, Gonzalo Camarillo, 03:56
- Re: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, Masataka Ohta, 00:14
October 20, 2010
- Re: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, David Conrad, 21:51
- Re: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, Masataka Ohta, 21:23
- Re: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 21:06
- Re: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, Mark Andrews, 20:55
- Re: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, Martin Rex, 20:14
- Re: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, Masataka Ohta, 19:29
- Re: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 18:31
- Re: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, bill manning, 17:07
- RE: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, Richard Shockey, 16:40
- Re: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, Olaf Kolkman, 16:20
- Re: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 16:15
- Re: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, David Conrad, 16:06
- Re: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, bill manning, 15:59
- RE: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, Richard Shockey, 15:52
- Re: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 15:50
- RE: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, Richard Shockey, 15:47
- Re: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 15:42
- Re: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, David Conrad, 15:38
- Re: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, bill manning, 15:37
- Re: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, Paul Hoffman, 15:18
- Re: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, bill manning, 14:43
- RE: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, Richard Shockey, 14:25
- Re: Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-netmod-dsdl-map-08, Ben Campbell, 12:14
- Re: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, Masataka Ohta, 07:22
- Re: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, Ray Bellis, 06:15
- Re: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, Masataka Ohta, 06:08
- draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N, Ray Bellis, 05:27
October 15, 2010
- Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch, Gonzalo Camarillo, 10:19
- Re: [Simple] secdir review of draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch, Adrian Georgescu, 10:18
- Re: [Simple] secdir review of draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch, Adrian Georgescu, 10:17
- Re: can we please postpone the ipv6 post-mortem?, Martin Rex, 09:35
- Re: can we please postpone the ipv6 post-mortem?, Masataka Ohta, 08:08
- Re: can we please postpone the ipv6 post-mortem?, Stefan Winter, 04:22
- Re: can we please postpone the ipv6 post-mortem?, Rémi Després, 03:55
- Re: can we please postpone the ipv6 post-mortem?, Masataka Ohta, 03:30
- Re: can we please postpone the ipv6 post-mortem?, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 02:25
- Re: can we please postpone the ipv6 post-mortem?, Rémi Després, 02:14
- RE: [Dime] Mail regarding draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bis, Glen Zorn, 01:19
October 14, 2010
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- RE: Mail regarding draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis, Glen Zorn, 23:47
- Re: can we please postpone the ipv6 post-mortem?, Joel Jaeggli, 18:48
- Re: [Simple] secdir review of draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch, Ben Campbell, 18:00
- Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch, Cullen Jennings, 15:31
- Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch, Ted Hardie, 12:46
- Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch, Ben Campbell, 12:41
- Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch, Ted Hardie, 12:22
- Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch, Ted Hardie, 12:22
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 11:42
October 13, 2010
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Masataka Ohta, 19:44
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Masataka Ohta, 19:24
- Fwd: [Geopriv] I-D Action:draft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option-09.txt, todd glassey, 16:40
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Dave CROCKER, 16:37
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Brian E Carpenter, 15:27
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 14:38
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 14:37
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 14:36
- RE: US DoD and IPv6, Fleischman, Eric, 14:35
- Re: The Implications of 6rd and ARIN 2010-9, Marshall Eubanks, 14:20
- Re: The Implications of 6rd and ARIN 2010-9, Rémi Després, 08:43
October 12, 2010
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Dave CROCKER, 23:21
- Re: The Implications of 6rd and ARIN 2010-9, Mark Andrews, 20:47
- Re: The Implications of 6rd and ARIN 2010-9, Michael Richardson, 20:05
- Re: The Implications of 6rd and ARIN 2010-9, Mark Andrews, 18:03
- NetFPGA China Tutorial Beijing China, November 6-7, 2010, Adam Covington, 17:50
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Masataka Ohta, 16:55
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Masataka Ohta, 16:35
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Keith Moore, 16:23
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Noel Chiappa, 15:08
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Dave CROCKER, 14:14
- Links to the "tools" web pages, Worley, Dale R (Dale), 10:41
- test-ipv6.com: Test Your IPv6 Connectivity, Sabahattin Gucukoglu, 10:37
- The Implications of 6rd and ARIN 2010-9, Marshall Eubanks, 10:06
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:03
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-25.txt> (Diameter Base, Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Stefan Winter, 06:50
October 11, 2010
- Gen-ART LC Review of draft-zeilenga-ldap-dontusecopy-08, Ben Campbell, 16:39
- IESG Statement on Document Shepherds, IESG Secretary, 11:58
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Dave CROCKER, 11:35
- Re: can we please postpone the ipv6 post-mortem?, Rémi Després, 10:26
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Joel M. Halpern, 10:25
- Re: can we please postpone the ipv6 post-mortem?, Rémi Després, 10:15
- Re: IETF web site down for IPv6?, Glen Barney (AMS), 10:12
- Re: can we please postpone the ipv6 post-mortem?, Masataka Ohta, 09:50
- Re: can we please postpone the ipv6 post-mortem?, Rémi Després, 09:40
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Dave CROCKER, 09:34
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Dave CROCKER, 09:33
- Re: can we please postpone the ipv6 post-mortem?, Rémi Després, 09:30
- Re: can we please postpone the ipv6 post-mortem?, Rémi Després, 09:16
- IETF web site down for IPv6?, Tim Chown, 08:34
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Masataka Ohta, 05:30
October 10, 2010
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Dave CROCKER, 18:51
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Marshall Eubanks, 18:46
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Joel Jaeggli, 18:21
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Dave CROCKER, 18:03
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Dave CROCKER, 18:02
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Steve Crocker, 17:45
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Steve Crocker, 16:51
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Masataka Ohta, 08:43
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Sabahattin Gucukoglu, 07:52
October 08, 2010
- Re: can we please postpone the ipv6 post-mortem?, Martin Rex, 21:47
- RE: can we please postpone the ipv6 post-mortem?, Michel Py, 21:47
- RE: secdir review of draft-ietf-csi-dhcpv6-cga-ps-04.txt, Sheng Jiang, 21:41
- Re: can we please postpone the ipv6 post-mortem?, Brian E Carpenter, 19:24
- Re: can we please postpone the ipv6 post-mortem?, Peter Dambier, 18:49
- RE: can we please postpone the ipv6 post-mortem?, Michel Py, 18:34
- Re: can we please postpone the ipv6 post-mortem?, Masataka Ohta, 18:27
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Dave Cridland, 17:52
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Dave Cridland, 17:49
- Re: can we please postpone the ipv6 post-mortem?, Martin Rex, 17:45
- Re: can we please postpone the ipv6 post-mortem?, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 17:44
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 17:44
- Re: existing (and questionable) application designs [was Re: US DoD and IPv6], Phillip Hallam-Baker, 17:43
- Re: IETF-ad-hominem (Was: Re: US DoD and IPv6), Dave CROCKER, 17:42
- Re: can we please postpone the ipv6 post-mortem?, Bob Hinden, 15:57
- Re: can we please postpone the ipv6 post-mortem?, Noel Chiappa, 14:46
- Re: can we please postpone the ipv6 post-mortem?, John C Klensin, 14:45
- Re: Internet Architecture (was US DoD and IPv6), Noel Chiappa, 14:44
- Re: can we please postpone the ipv6 post-mortem?, Brian E Carpenter, 14:44
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Marshall Eubanks, 14:32
- Re: can we please postpone the ipv6 post-mortem?, Marshall Eubanks, 14:04
- Re: can we please postpone the ipv6 post-mortem?, David Conrad, 13:20
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Masataka Ohta, 13:03
- Re: can we please postpone the ipv6 post-mortem?, Livingood, Jason, 12:53
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Masataka Ohta, 12:53
- can we please postpone the ipv6 post-mortem?, james woodyatt, 12:02
- Re: Internet Architecture (was US DoD and IPv6), Noel Chiappa, 11:54
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Keith Moore, 11:49
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Dave Cridland, 11:31
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Keith Moore, 11:12
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Ole Jacobsen, 09:58
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, John C Klensin, 09:50
- RE: US DoD and IPv6, Christian Huitema, 09:45
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Ofer Inbar, 09:25
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Steve Crocker, 08:47
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Noel Chiappa, 08:37
- Re: existing (and questionable) application designs [was Re: US DoD and IPv6], Keith Moore, 08:01
October 07, 2010
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Masataka Ohta, 19:20
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Keith Moore, 18:22
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, David Conrad, 12:33
- Re: existing (and questionable) application designs [was Re: US DoD and IPv6], Phillip Hallam-Baker, 11:28
- Re: IETF-ad-hominem (Was: Re: US DoD and IPv6), Phillip Hallam-Baker, 11:28
- Re: Gen-ART LC/Telechat Review of draft-ietf-isis-genapp-03.txt, Ben Campbell, 11:27
- Re: existing (and questionable) application designs [was Re: US DoD and IPv6], Keith Moore, 09:59
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Keith Moore, 09:33
- Re: existing (and questionable) application designs [was Re: US DoD and IPv6], Noel Chiappa, 09:20
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Noel Chiappa, 09:07
- RE: IETF-ad-hominem (Was: Re: US DoD and IPv6), Dave Cridland, 04:50
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Masataka Ohta, 04:20
- RE: IETF-ad-hominem (Was: Re: US DoD and IPv6), Michel Py, 01:08
- RE: IETF-ad-hominem (Was: Re: US DoD and IPv6), Michel Py, 01:03
- Re: IETF-ad-hominem (Was: Re: US DoD and IPv6), JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 01:03
- IETF-ad-hominem (Was: Re: US DoD and IPv6), Richard L. Barnes, 00:05
October 06, 2010
- Re: existing (and questionable) application designs [was Re: US DoD and IPv6], Arnt Gulbrandsen, 23:47
- RE: US DoD and IPv6, Michel Py, 23:32
- Re: existing (and questionable) application designs [was Re: US DoD and IPv6], Masataka Ohta, 21:43
- existing (and questionable) application designs [was Re: US DoD and IPv6], Brian E Carpenter, 20:18
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Fernando Gont, 19:57
- Re: [TLS] [certid] review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-09, Peter Saint-Andre, 15:56
- Re: [certid] review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-09, Peter Saint-Andre, 15:54
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Keith Moore, 15:43
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Keith Moore, 15:40
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Keith Moore, 15:34
- Re: [ietf] DNS spoofing at captive portals, Rich Kulawiec, 15:08
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 15:07
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 15:06
- RE: US DoD and IPv6, Fleischman, Eric, 15:05
- RE: Gen-ART LC/Telechat Review of draft-ietf-isis-genapp-03.txt, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg), 15:05
- Re: Gen-ART LC/Telechat Review of draft-ietf-isis-genapp-03.txt, Ben Campbell, 15:04
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 15:03
- RE: Gen-ART LC/Telechat Review of draft-ietf-isis-genapp-03.txt, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg), 15:02
- Re: Gen-ART LC/Telechat Review of draft-ietf-isis-genapp-03.txt, Ben Campbell, 15:01
- RE: Gen-ART LC/Telechat Review of draft-ietf-isis-genapp-03.txt, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg), 15:00
- Gen-ART LC/Telechat Review of draft-ietf-isis-genapp-03.txt, Ben Campbell, 14:59
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Fernando Gont, 14:41
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Keith Moore, 12:54
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, David Conrad, 12:46
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Keith Moore, 12:44
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Fernando Gont, 12:23
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Keith Moore, 11:43
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Noel Chiappa, 10:01
- RE: US DoD and IPv6, Noel Chiappa, 09:50
- Re: Pigeon flies past broadband in data speed race, Richard Bennett, 07:18
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Keith Moore, 06:53
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, David Conrad, 01:07
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Masataka Ohta, 00:59
- Re: IESG approval, SM, 00:44
- RE: US DoD and IPv6, Michel Py, 00:14
October 05, 2010
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Keith Moore, 23:19
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Noel Chiappa, 22:42
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Michael Richardson, 22:36
- End to end NAT (was Re: US DoD and IPv6), Masataka Ohta, 21:33
- Re: iOS IMAP IDLE (Standard "Push Email") Deficiency, Explanation?, Eric Burger, 19:40
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Keith Moore, 19:24
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Noel Chiappa, 19:17
- Re: US DoD and IPv6, Noel Chiappa, 19:06
- Re: Fwd: iOS IMAP IDLE (Standard "Push Email") Deficiency, Explanation?, Martin Konold, 11:34
- Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch, Gonzalo Camarillo, 11:32
- Re: Review of draft-gundavelli-v6ops-l2-unicast, Ole Troan, 11:31
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-avt-rapid-acquisition-for-rtp-15.txt> (Unicast-Based Rapid Acquisition of Multicast RTP Sessions) to Proposed Standard, Magnus Westerlund, 03:29
October 04, 2010
- Re: Discussion of draft-hardie-advance-mechanics-00.txt, Martin Rex, 18:37
- Re: Discussion of draft-hardie-advance-mechanics-00.txt, Ted Hardie, 17:14
- Re: Discussion of draft-hardie-advance-mechanics-00.txt, Keith Moore, 15:55
- Re: Discussion of draft-hardie-advance-mechanics-00.txt, Barry Leiba, 15:16
- Fwd: iOS IMAP IDLE (Standard "Push Email") Deficiency, Explanation?, Sabahattin Gucukoglu, 12:19
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-avt-rapid-acquisition-for-rtp-15.txt> (Unicast-Based Rapid Acquisition of Multicast RTP Sessions) to Proposed Standard, Ali C. Begen (abegen), 11:22
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-avt-rapid-acquisition-for-rtp-15.txt> (Unicast-Based Rapid Acquisition of Multicast RTP Sessions) to Proposed Standard, Ali C. Begen (abegen), 10:50
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-csi-dhcpv6-cga-ps-04, Roni Even, 10:49
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:48
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-avt-rapid-acquisition-for-rtp-15.txt> (Unicast-Based Rapid Acquisition of Multicast RTP Sessions) to Proposed Standard, Magnus Westerlund, 10:38
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-avt-rapid-acquisition-for-rtp-15.txt> (Unicast-Based Rapid Acquisition of Multicast RTP Sessions) to Proposed Standard, Magnus Westerlund, 07:00