David has said this well. Thank you.
Please let me know if there are any other questions.
--Michelle
On 1/30/11 10:52 AM, "David Conrad" <drc(_at_)virtualized(_dot_)org> wrote:
Cullen,
On Jan 29, 2011, at 8:54 PM, Cullen Jennings wrote:
AFAICT, the experts team reports to IANA. We make recommendations to
them. They are the ones who have the conversation with the applicant.
They can take our advice or not - that's their decision.
I think you are pretty misrepresenting the situation. My impression of the
reality of the situation is that if the IANA did not like the advice of the
expert reviewer, they might ask the AD to override but short of that they
pretty much do whatever the expert says.
Joe is closer.
In general, IANA staff are not technical experts in any of the wide variety of
areas for which they are asked to provide registry services. As such, they
rely on technical experts to provide input/advice/recommendations. In the
past, there were some very rare cases in which the advice provided by the
technical experts was deemed insufficient and IANA staff looked to the ADs or
the IESG for additional input. However, at least historically, IANA staff
viewed the maintenance of the registries as their responsibility (at the
direction of the IESG), not the technical experts' responsibility. I would be
surprised if this had changed.
Regards,
-drc
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf