On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 1:11 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 3:33 AM, James M. Polk <jmpolk(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com>
playing devil's advocate here...
Say someone submits a request for an existing DS to the IESG and it takes
6 months (or 3 months) to get through the process, but only 2 months remain
before the 2 year window is up (since this RFC was published). Does that
grandfather the DS into "the process" - meaning that document is no longer
subject to this 'within 2 year notice' rule?
I'm just saying that this appears to beg all DS editors to get their DS
notifications into the IESG sooner rather than later, which is fine, but
that also creates a heck of a workload on the IESG that they currently do
not have, does it not?
Something is going to be impacted.
Make it a 2 year deadline for receiving requests. Problem solved.
Yes, good idea.
Ietf mailing list