On 2011-06-09 04:17, james woodyatt wrote:
On Jun 8, 2011, at 9:04 AM, Noel Chiappa wrote:
From: Martin Rex <mrex(_at_)sap(_dot_)com>
Classification of 6to4 as historic is [in]appropriate use of the IETF
process, because it would be a political .. statement.
Well, we've never done _that_ before, have we? Wouldn't want to set an
I see no reason for IETF to avoid setting standards for layer-9 protocols.
In any case, I don't see the politics, unless (for example) declaring
RFC 1267 Historic was politics too.
Ietf mailing list