Scott,
Well, it's moot now because I've withdrawn the request.
However, according to the IESG statement dated 10/20/11 titled
"Revised IESG Statement on Designating RFCs as Historic", RFC
justifications are no longer required for this action. If you have an
argument against this new policy, you should respond to the IESG's
statement.
Cheers,
Andy
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Bradner, Scott <sob(_at_)harvard(_dot_)edu>
wrote:
where is the written justification?
recording a reason will help people in the future understand why this was
done
I object to a reclassification without a RFC saying why
Scott
On Oct 27, 2011, at 4:16 PM, IESG Secretary wrote:
The IESG has received a request from an individual to reclassify RFC 979
(PSN End-to-End functional specification) to HISTORIC. The current status
of this document is UNKNOWN.
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2011-11-24. Exceptionally, comments
may
be sent to iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf