Hi Dale,
At 07:20 08-11-2011, Worley, Dale R (Dale) wrote:
Well, all of the *drafts* for these WGs have to be published by now,
as I-D submission has been cut off. So you can review them.
I predict that there will be a flood of I-Ds on Monday. The
availability of I-D issue is not specific to the WGs mentioned in my
previous message.
I think you are concerned that there is no public notice of *which*
documents *need to be reviewed* for the session, so it is no help to
know that the document is available to read if you knew that you
needed to read it.
I would not rate it as a concern as that's too strong. I'll attempt
to provide a different perspective. Let's assume that I will be
following the forthcoming meeting. As I am new to the IETF, I'll go
to www.ietf.org to find the agenda (
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/82/agenda.html ). After going
through the agenda for the WGs I follow, I see that I have some spare
time which I could put to use by identifying interesting work being
done in other WGs or areas. As Websex sounds interesting, I read the
agenda to check out the drafts as the WG Chairs will likely ask "who
has read this draft". There are three drafts [1]:
(i) draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-01
(ii) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-evans-palmer-hsts-pinning/
(iii) draft-hodges-websec-framework-reqs-00
During the WG session, I find out that I read an old version of the I-Ds.
I could pick other examples. Note that publishing an agenda or
submitting an I-D before the submission cut-off does not mean that
people will read all that. The point is to give people adequate
time to identify and review what will be discussed.
Regards,
-sm
1. Two of these I-Ds have already been revised and the reference for
one of them is not stable.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf