At 13:03 30-11-2011, Barry Leiba wrote:
It does not. There's no reason that anyone implementing ADSP need pay
attention to this. *IF* you implement this, it might change your
behaviour with respect to ADSP, but information about that is
contained here. There's no reason for this to "update" 5617 in the
I did call this out in my shepherd review (see the PROTO writeup:
and click "show all" on the PROTO writeup entry; side point: it should
probably be easier to get to the PROTO writeup for a document).
I missed that.
I actually think it's clever to put the information here in this
manner, but, as I say in the writeup, it is unusual. I prefer that we
leave it here, and just make sure that the intelligent folks at IANA
do the intelligent thing. This can then serve as a template for the
IANA Considerations section for a possible revision that moves ATPS to
Standards Track, should that happen.
I support publication of the draft as Experimental.
Ietf mailing list