On 1/26/12 1:25 PM, Worley, Dale R (Dale) wrote:
OK, that resolves all my objections. The "higher pay grades" (IESG
and IAB) may have policy concerns, but that is not my expertise.
Just in case others are having similar thoughts:
The IESG and IAB are *not* the ones that get to make the decision about
what ought to be done here. The community needs to come to a consensus
about the right outcome and the leadership folks will judge that
consensus and instantiate whatever actions need to be taken. It's
certainly OK if you feel you don't have enough information yet to decide
what the appropriate action is, but if you're a member of this
community, it is your responsibility to contribute to the decision in
the end. You may decide that the conversation on the list has concluded
the way you like; you're not required to post just to say that you
agree. But don't expect the leadership to make this decision for you. We
will give guidance as needed, but it's your decision.
I'll post my understanding of the consensus as we go along. So far, I've
seen a few suggestions about the disposition of the documents, sanctions
on the author(s), and requests to be made to the employer of the
author(s). But I've certainly not seen enough to declare a consensus yet.
pr
--
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf