On 2012-03-06 14:56, Yoav Nir wrote:
Even better, also add the XML2RFC output if it's available at the same time:
for example, (just picking my own latest draft as an example):
I don't know which drafts get this version (perhaps those submitted along with
XML?), but they're sure easier to read than TXT.
Indeed I'd like to understand that as well. In particular, as this
apparently runs an outdated version of rfc2629.xslt, and then mangles
it's output (HTML tidy maybe?) causing what's served to be invalid HTML.
Best regards, Julian
Ietf mailing list