Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
2012-03-08 22:39:52
Mark Andrews wrote:
What should a _new_ recursive non-authoritative server send as response
back to the stub resolver when it encounters a NOTIMP response from the
authoritative server for an AAAA query?
Well the server should try the next server for the zone. If all of them
return NOTIMP, SERVFAIL/NOTIMP.
+1, this seems logical.
What is perhaps ultimately important to a developer is its application
translation of DNS query results, including the application tracking
for the redundancy of failures. *Rhetorically,* does a NOIMP enable
an automated trigger to disable a specific DOMAIN query? Should a
protocol translate SERVFAIL as an application temporary or permanent
failure? Can a temp status change to permanent due to redundancy?, etc.
--
HLS
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with, (continued)
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with, Martin Rex
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with, Martin Rex
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with, Mark Andrews
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with, Martin Rex
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with, Martin Rex
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with, Martin Rex
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with, Mark Andrews
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with, Mark Andrews
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with, Martin Rex
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with, Mark Andrews
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with,
Hector <=
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with, Martin Rex
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with, Mark Andrews
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with, Hector
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with, Donald Eastlake
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with, ned+ietf
- Re: field types, was provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with, John Levine
- Re: field types, was provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with, Hector
- Re: field types, was provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with, Alessandro Vesely
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with, Hector
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with, Mark Andrews |
Next by Date: |
Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with, Martin Rex |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with, Mark Andrews |
Next by Thread: |
Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with, Martin Rex |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|