IETF Discussion (date)
April 30, 2012
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Glen Zorn, 20:55
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Henning Schulzrinne, 20:54
- Re: Is the IETF aging?, Alia Atlas, 20:54
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Richard L. Barnes, 20:33
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Fred Baker, 20:32
- Re: Is the IETF aging?, Mary Barnes, 20:26
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, John C Klensin, 19:29
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Ofer Inbar, 19:03
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-opus-12.txt> (Definition of the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard, Stephan Wenger, 17:54
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Fred Baker, 17:52
- RE: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, ned+ietf, 17:26
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Richard L. Barnes, 16:36
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Janet P Gunn, 16:31
- RE: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Worley, Dale R (Dale), 16:14
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Richard L. Barnes, 15:46
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Mary Barnes, 14:52
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-opus-12.txt> (Definition of the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard, SM, 14:06
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-pwe3-static-pw-status-10, Ben Campbell, 13:32
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-pwe3-static-pw-status-10, Stewart Bryant, 12:26
- Re: Last Call: <draft-polk-ipr-disclosure-03.txt> (Promoting Compliance with Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Disclosure Rules) to Informational RFC, Stephan Wenger, 12:20
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Melinda Shore, 12:04
- FW: I-D Action: draft-sprecher-mpls-tp-oam-considerations-03.txt, Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon), 11:48
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Riccardo Bernardini, 10:33
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Huub van Helvoort, 09:53
- RE: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Worley, Dale R (Dale), 09:23
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Mary Barnes, 09:14
- Re: Is the IETF aging?, John C Klensin, 09:10
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Monique Morrow, 04:11
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Riccardo Bernardini, 04:04
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 03:46
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Monique Morrow, 03:45
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 03:40
- 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry • The Register, Brian E Carpenter, 03:35
April 27, 2012
- Re: Is the IETF aging?, John C Klensin, 21:50
- Re: Is the IETF aging?, Bjoern Hoehrmann, 19:06
- Re: Is the IETF aging?, SM, 18:46
- Re: Is the IETF aging?, Melinda Shore, 18:39
- RE: Is the IETF aging?, Robin Uyeshiro, 16:35
- Re: Is the IETF aging?, Joel jaeggli, 15:38
- Re: Is the IETF aging?, Alissa Cooper, 15:32
- Re: Is the IETF aging?, Paul Hoffman, 15:24
- RE: Is the IETF aging?, Murray S. Kucherawy, 14:40
- Re: Is the IETF aging?, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 14:29
- Re: Is the IETF aging?, Margaret Wasserman, 14:25
- Re: Is the IETF aging?, John C Klensin, 14:23
- Re: Is the IETF aging?, SM, 13:55
- Re: Is the IETF aging?, Robert Raszuk, 13:53
- RE: Is the IETF aging?, John E Drake, 13:51
- RE: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 25-Apr-2012 update, Linda Dunbar, 13:30
- Re: Is the IETF aging?, Melinda Shore, 12:38
- Re: Is the IETF aging?, Randy Bush, 12:34
- Re: Is the IETF aging?, Melinda Shore, 12:13
- Re: Is the IETF aging?, Harald Alvestrand, 11:42
- RE: Is the IETF aging?, Murray S. Kucherawy, 11:41
- RE: Is the IETF aging?, Worley, Dale R (Dale), 10:57
- RE: Is the IETF aging?, Worley, Dale R (Dale), 10:46
- Re: Is the IETF aging?, Michael Richardson, 10:33
- RE: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 25-Apr-2012 update, Alan Kavanagh, 10:33
- Re: Is the IETF aging?, Marc Blanchet, 10:28
- Re: Is the IETF aging?, Yoav Nir, 10:27
- Re: Is the IETF aging?, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:24
- Re: Is the IETF aging?, Mary Barnes, 10:08
- Re: Is the IETF aging?, Carsten Bormann, 10:06
- Re: Is the IETF aging?, Dave Cridland, 10:00
- Re: Is the IETF aging?, Yoav Nir, 09:41
- Is the IETF aging?, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 09:07
- weekly, Thomas Narten, 06:13
April 26, 2012
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-pwe3-static-pw-status-10, Ben Campbell, 19:05
- Re: [MBONED] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format-01.txt> (IPv4-Embedded IPv6 Multicast Address Format) to Proposed Standard, SM, 18:26
- RE: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 25-Apr-2012 update, Joe Pelissier (jopeliss), 16:35
- RE: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 25-Apr-2012 update, Pat Thaler, 16:22
- RE: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 25-Apr-2012 update, Joe Pelissier (jopeliss), 16:17
- RE: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 25-Apr-2012 update, david.black, 16:17
- RE: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 25-Apr-2012 update, Pat Thaler, 16:17
- Re: [MBONED] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format-01.txt> (IPv4-Embedded IPv6 Multicast Address Format) to Proposed Standard, Jacni Qin, 16:17
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, ned+ietf, 02:29
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, David Conrad, 00:17
April 25, 2012
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, ned+ietf, 21:57
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, David Conrad, 21:18
- Re: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 25-Apr-2012 update, Stewart Bryant, 19:01
- Re: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 25-Apr-2012 update, Stewart Bryant, 18:59
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, SM, 18:16
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Eric Burger, 17:06
- WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 25-Apr-2012 update, Stewart Bryant, 16:39
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 13:53
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 13:33
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt>, =JeffH, 13:28
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 13:27
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 13:25
- RE: [MBONED] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format-01.txt> (IPv4-Embedded IPv6 Multicast Address Format) to Proposed Standard, SM, 13:24
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, ned+ietf, 13:03
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based, Paul Wouters, 12:30
- RE: [MBONED] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format-01.txt> (IPv4-Embedded IPv6 Multicast Address Format) to Proposed Standard, mohamed.boucadair, 12:29
- RE: [PWE3] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit-06.txt> (Pseudowire Preferential Forwarding Status Bit) to Proposed Standard, Aissaoui, Mustapha (Mustapha), 12:29
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, David Conrad, 11:55
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based, Andrew Sullivan, 10:15
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Samuel Weiler, 09:44
- Re: [nvo3] Key difference between DCVPN and L2VPN/L3VPN, Stewart Bryant, 09:31
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 09:28
- RE: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-emu-chbind-14, Stephen Hanna, 09:21
- Re: [nvo3] Key difference between DCVPN and L2VPN/L3VPN, Marshall Eubanks, 08:57
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 08:53
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> - Referring to the DANE protocol and DANE-denoted certificate associations, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 07:48
- Re: [IAOC] IAOC and permissions [Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets], Marshall Eubanks, 07:40
- Re: IAOC and permissions [Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets], Brian E Carpenter, 05:36
- RE: Questions: WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update, Adrian Farrel, 05:25
- RE: Questions: WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update, Adrian Farrel, 05:10
- RE: [nvo3] Key difference between DCVPN and L2VPN/L3VPN, Adrian Farrel, 05:02
- RE: IAOC and permissions [Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets], Christian Huitema, 02:57
- IAOC and permissions [Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets], Brian E Carpenter, 02:43
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Martin Rex, 02:39
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-emu-chbind-14, Joe Salowey, 00:35
April 24, 2012
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Martin Rex, 19:20
- NVO3 Charter Review, Thomas Narten, 19:14
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Martin Rex, 19:06
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, James M. Polk, 18:59
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, SM, 18:59
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Stephan Wenger, 18:32
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, John C Klensin, 18:31
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Stephen Farrell, 18:28
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, John C Klensin, 18:26
- RE: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, John C Klensin, 18:20
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, James M. Polk, 18:19
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, John C Klensin, 18:17
- RE: Key difference between DCVPN and L2VPN/L3VPN, Linda Dunbar, 17:40
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> - Referring to the DANE protocol and DANE-denoted certificate associations, =JeffH, 17:24
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Martin Rex, 17:17
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Lixia Zhang, 17:12
- Re: Key difference between DCVPN and L2VPN/L3VPN, James M. Polk, 17:08
- Re: Key difference between DCVPN and L2VPN/L3VPN, Stewart Bryant, 16:53
- RE: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Robin Uyeshiro, 16:51
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Martin Rex, 16:48
- Re: Questions: WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update, Stewart Bryant, 16:48
- Key difference between DCVPN and L2VPN/L3VPN, Linda Dunbar, 16:41
- Re: Questions: WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update, Stewart Bryant, 16:34
- Re: Questions: WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update, Stewart Bryant, 16:34
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, John C Klensin, 16:33
- Re: Questions: WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update, Stewart Bryant, 16:29
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, John C Klensin, 16:28
- RE: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, John C Klensin, 16:17
- RE: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-emu-chbind-14, Stephen Hanna, 16:07
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Martin Rex, 15:41
- Questions: WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update, Adrian Farrel, 15:05
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Martin Rex, 15:02
- RE: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Christian Huitema, 14:56
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Martin Rex, 14:35
- Nits: WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 updates, Adrian Farrel, 14:27
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Sam Hartman, 13:47
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Stephan Wenger, 13:34
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Michael StJohns, 13:33
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Martin Rex, 13:10
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Joel jaeggli, 12:06
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Michael StJohns, 11:50
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Michael StJohns, 11:48
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Martin Rex, 11:22
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme-04.txt> (The "about" URI Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Barry Leiba, 10:36
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Avri Doria, 10:10
- Re: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update, Anoop Ghanwani, 10:09
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, David Morris, 09:30
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Donald Eastlake, 07:51
- Re: SMTP question - a session containing multiple transactions, Tony Finch, 07:39
- RE: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-emu-chbind-14, Stephen Hanna, 07:28
- GenART LC review of draft-ietf-mboned-mcaddrdoc-03, Roni Even, 07:12
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Brian E Carpenter, 05:23
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, SM, 05:22
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme-04.txt> (The "about" URI Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Mykyta Yevstifeyev, 04:42
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, t.p., 04:38
- RE: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich), 04:06
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Yoav Nir, 04:02
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Avri Doria, 03:24
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Bob Hinden, 02:38
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Fernando Gont, 02:13
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Dave Crocker, 01:57
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Brian E Carpenter, 01:40
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Brian E Carpenter, 01:36
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, John C Klensin, 01:00
April 23, 2012
- Re: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update, Benson Schliesser, 20:48
- Re: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update, Joel jaeggli, 20:43
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-emu-chbind-14, Sam Hartman, 19:56
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Fernando Gont, 19:19
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Fernando Gont, 19:17
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Fernando Gont, 19:16
- Re: Audio recordings for IETF 83, SM, 18:32
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Donald Eastlake, 18:20
- Re: Audio recordings for IETF 83, Marshall Eubanks, 17:49
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Peter Sylvester, 16:40
- Re: Audio recordings for IETF 83, SM, 16:12
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-emu-chbind-14, Joe Salowey, 16:07
- Re: Audio recordings for IETF 83, Marshall Eubanks, 15:49
- Re: Audio recordings for IETF 83, SM, 15:44
- Re: Audio recordings for IETF 83, Joel jaeggli, 14:52
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Stephan Wenger, 14:40
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, James M. Polk, 14:24
- Re: Audio recordings for IETF 83, Peter Saint-Andre, 13:54
- Re: Audio recordings for IETF 83, SM, 13:47
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Margaret Wasserman, 13:33
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Michael StJohns, 13:31
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Andrew Sullivan, 12:57
- Fwd: New: Information-Centric Networking Research Group (ICNRG), Eggert, Lars, 12:28
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Andy Bierman, 12:26
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Samuel Weiler, 12:24
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Michael StJohns, 12:13
- Re: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update, Thomas Narten, 12:08
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Ted Hardie, 11:55
- Resolving last call comments on draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point, Adrian Farrel, 11:25
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Melinda Shore, 11:23
- Re: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update, Stewart Bryant, 10:58
- RE: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme-04.txt> (The "about" URI Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Worley, Dale R (Dale), 10:39
- Re: SMTP question - a session containing multiple transactions, Nick Hilliard, 10:35
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Scott O Bradner, 10:12
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, David Morris, 10:04
- RE: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, DRAGE, Keith (Keith), 09:38
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, John G. Scudder, 09:37
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Avri Doria, 09:37
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Aaron Stone, 09:36
- RE: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, DRAGE, Keith (Keith), 09:35
- SMTP question - a session containing multiple transactions, Joe Hwang, 09:34
- Resolution of last call on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-analysis, Adrian Farrel, 09:26
- RE: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, George, Wes, 09:08
- RE: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, George, Wes, 09:05
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Yoav Nir, 08:37
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Thomas Nadeau, 08:07
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Carsten Bormann, 07:28
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Randy Bush, 05:53
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Brian E Carpenter, 05:33
- RE: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Romascanu, Dan (Dan), 05:29
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme-04.txt> (The "about" URI Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Mykyta Yevstifeyev, 05:01
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Tobias Gondrom, 05:00
- RE: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Dearlove, Christopher (UK), 04:26
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Yoav Nir, 04:10
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Kireeti Kompella, 03:16
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Joel jaeggli, 02:05
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Brian E Carpenter, 02:00
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Yoav Nir, 01:56
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Yoav Nir, 01:56
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Tim Chown, 01:05
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Joel jaeggli, 01:01
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Tobias Gondrom, 00:48
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Robert Raszuk, 00:45
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Robert Raszuk, 00:42
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Joel jaeggli, 00:42
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Randy Bush, 00:21
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Tobias Gondrom, 00:12
April 22, 2012
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Russ Housley, 23:42
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Tobias Gondrom, 23:22
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Joel jaeggli, 23:15
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Shishio Tsuchiya, 22:59
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Robert Raszuk, 22:49
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Tobias Gondrom, 22:45
- Future Handling of Blue Sheets, IETF Chair, 09:31
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Fred Baker, 08:45
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Carsten Bormann, 07:18
- RE: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Romascanu, Dan (Dan), 06:09
April 21, 2012
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format-01.txt> (IPv4-Embedded IPv6 Multicast Address Format) to Proposed Standard, SM, 18:34
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, SM, 13:56
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Joel jaeggli, 12:02
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Randy Presuhn, 10:41
- RE: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Ronald Bonica, 09:45
- Re: SMTP question - a session containing multiple transactions, Joe Hwang, 06:28
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Brian E Carpenter, 01:49
- Re: SMTP question - a session containing multiple transactions, Dave Crocker, 00:55
April 20, 2012
- Re: SMTP question - a session containing multiple transactions, John Levine, 23:52
- SMTP question - a session containing multiple transactions, Joe Hwang, 23:37
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Melinda Shore, 19:38
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Randy Presuhn, 18:04
- RE: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Ronald Bonica, 16:01
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Yoav Nir, 15:49
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, SM, 15:01
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Melinda Shore, 14:27
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Marc Blanchet, 14:06
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Scott O Bradner, 14:02
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, RJ Atkinson, 12:33
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, John Levine, 11:24
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Dave Crocker, 11:16
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Brian E Carpenter, 10:24
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Stewart Bryant, 10:13
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Randy Presuhn, 10:09
- RE: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Murray S. Kucherawy, 08:37
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Brian E Carpenter, 06:40
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, John Leslie, 06:39
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Randy Bush, 04:05
- RE: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Adrian Farrel, 04:04
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, t.p., 03:26
- RE: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Adrian Farrel, 03:25
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Eggert, Lars, 03:24
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Eric Burger, 02:56
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Robert Raszuk, 02:42
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, SM, 02:42
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, ned+ietf, 02:35
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Eggert, Lars, 02:31
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Brian E Carpenter, 02:20
April 19, 2012
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Andrew Sullivan, 21:41
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Terry Manderson, 19:40
- RE: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Murray S. Kucherawy, 19:02
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Lixia Zhang, 18:48
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, SM, 17:29
- RE: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Ronald Bonica, 17:28
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Carsten Bormann, 17:20
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Yoav Nir, 16:18
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, David Conrad, 16:18
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Dave Crocker, 16:00
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Eliot Lear, 15:39
- Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Adrian Farrel, 15:31
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme-04.txt> (The "about" URI Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Andrew Sullivan, 14:47
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme-04.txt> (The "about" URI Scheme) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 14:30
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme-04.txt> (The "about"URI Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Worley, Dale R (Dale), 09:48
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme-04.txt> (The "about"URI Scheme) to Proposed Standard, t.p., 08:55
April 13, 2012
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, John Gilmore, 14:01
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, Paul Wouters, 14:01
- secdir review of draft-ietf-emu-chbind-14, Stephen Hanna, 13:27
- Re: Post-RFC1480 .us TLD, John Levine, 11:42
- RE: New Non-WG Mailing List: lmap -- Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance, Henning Schulzrinne, 10:42
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based, ned+ietf, 02:27
April 12, 2012
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based, Martin Rex, 23:00
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, SM, 17:44
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The, Martin Rex, 16:36
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, ned+ietf, 16:09
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ancp-pon-02, Bitar, Nabil N, 14:15
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, Ondřej Surý, 14:14
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, Ondřej Surý, 14:14
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, Peter Palfrader, 14:13
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, Ondřej Surý, 14:13
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, Ondřej Surý, 14:12
- Re: [savi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-savi-dhcp-12.txt> (SAVI Solution for DHCP) to Proposed Standard, Jun Bi, 14:12
- Re: [savi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-savi-dhcp-12.txt> (SAVI Solution for DHCP) to Proposed Standard, eric levy-abegnoli, 14:11
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-johansson-loa-registry-05, Leif Johansson, 14:10
- Gen-ART review of draft-johansson-loa-registry-05, david.black, 14:10
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ancp-pon-02, Bitar, Nabil N, 14:09
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, Dave Cridland, 07:19
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, Dave Cridland, 03:26
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, SM, 02:15
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy, 00:34
April 08, 2012
- CALL FOR CANDIDATES FOR ITOJUN SERVICE AWARD, Jun Murai, 23:08
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Joel jaeggli, 19:42
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Steven Bellovin, 17:54
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, John C Klensin, 13:32
- Post-RFC1480 .us TLD, Michel Py, 12:54
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Joel jaeggli, 09:41
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Hector, 00:14
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Cameron Byrne, 00:02
April 07, 2012
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Christopher Morrow, 23:34
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Yoav Nir, 23:12
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Randy Bush, 15:43
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Carlos M. Martinez, 13:30
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Yoav Nir, 13:01
- RE: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Christian Huitema, 12:36
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-claise-export-application-info-in-ipfix-05, Roni Even, 04:56
April 06, 2012
- Re: Please check this idea, Nick Hilliard, 17:14
- RFC Server Outage Report, Glen, 17:10
- Please check this idea, Sreeraj, 14:32
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, John C Klensin, 14:26
- Re: Audio recordings for IETF 83, Alexa Morris, 12:29
- Re: Audio recordings for IETF 83, Simon Pietro Romano, 12:24
- Audio recordings for IETF 83, SM, 12:17
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Brian E Carpenter, 02:02
April 05, 2012
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, ned+ietf, 23:56
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Fred Baker, 22:47
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Joel jaeggli, 20:41
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Joel jaeggli, 20:41
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Masataka Ohta, 17:46
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, David Conrad, 14:58
- Re: GenART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-06, Stewart Bryant, 12:02
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Noel Chiappa, 11:27
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Brian E Carpenter, 11:06
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Bob Braden, 10:42
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Ofer Inbar, 10:01
- RE: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Worley, Dale R (Dale), 09:19
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Nick Hilliard, 08:59
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Sabahattin Gucukoglu, 07:52
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Robert Raszuk, 07:32
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Masataka Ohta, 06:56
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Margaret Wasserman, 06:37
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Masataka Ohta, 06:33
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Masataka Ohta, 06:21
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Nick Hilliard, 06:05
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Margaret Wasserman, 05:36
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Nick Hilliard, 03:48
- Call for Nominations: Applied Networking Research Prize 2012, Eggert, Lars, 03:47
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Hector, 01:57
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Robert Raszuk, 00:57
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Masataka Ohta, 00:55
April 04, 2012
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Martin Rex, 23:58
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Steven Bellovin, 22:06
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Masataka Ohta, 22:02
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Noel Chiappa, 21:33
- RE: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Christian Huitema, 20:53
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, David Meyer, 20:39
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Steven Bellovin, 20:32
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Hector, 19:28
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Randy Bush, 18:50
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Mark Andrews, 17:47
- Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-tcpm-3517bis-02, Ben Campbell, 17:05
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Noel Chiappa, 16:22
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Doug Barton, 14:51
- RE: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Greg Daley, 14:09
- RE: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Greg Daley, 14:08
- IETF 83 Operations and Administration Plenary Minutes, Russ Housley, 13:34
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Brian E Carpenter, 10:50
- RE: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Worley, Dale R (Dale), 09:09
- RE: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Worley, Dale R (Dale), 09:02
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Randy Bush, 08:41
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Randy Bush, 08:37
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, John C Klensin, 08:35
- IETF Journal v7.3 now available, Matthew Ford, 06:24
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Masataka Ohta, 03:27
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Brian E Carpenter, 01:24
April 03, 2012
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Masataka Ohta, 19:54
- Re: RFC 6592 on The Null Packet, Dean Willis, 19:29
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Doug Barton, 19:02
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Mark Andrews, 18:20
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Fred Baker, 18:12
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Mark Andrews, 17:30
- IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz, Sabahattin Gucukoglu, 15:25
- Re: RFC 6592 on The Null Packet, Michael Richardson, 14:06
- Re: Evil bit (RFC3514) finally implemented, Steven Bellovin, 11:27
- RE: RFC 6592 on The Null Packet, Worley, Dale R (Dale), 10:14
- RE: Evil bit (RFC3514) finally implemented, Adrian Farrel, 06:00
- Re: Evil bit (RFC3514) finally implemented, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 05:04
- Re: Evil bit (RFC3514) finally implemented, Simon Josefsson, 04:52
April 02, 2012
- Re: RFC 6592 on The Null Packet, Elwyn Davies, 18:34
- Re: Evil bit (RFC3514) finally implemented, Ray Bellis, 13:11
- Re: RFC 6592 on The Null Packet, Scott Brim, 12:53
- Re: Evil bit (RFC3514) finally implemented, Tony Finch, 10:22
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-johansson-loa-registry-04, Leif Johansson, 09:24
- RE: Gen-ART review of draft-johansson-loa-registry-04, david.black, 09:23
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-johansson-loa-registry-04, Leif Johansson, 09:22
- Gen-ART review of draft-johansson-loa-registry-04, david.black, 09:21
- Re: IPv6 Zone Identifiers Considered Hateful, Kruse, Hans, 09:21
- Re: Evil bit (RFC3514) finally implemented, Eggert, Lars, 02:44
- Re: RFC 6592 on The Null Packet, Riccardo Bernardini, 02:13