IETF Discussion (date)
April 30, 2013
- Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, Scott Kitterman, 21:28
- Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, Scott Kitterman, 21:24
- Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, Mark Andrews, 21:12
- Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, Mark Andrews, 21:12
- Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, Sam Hartman, 21:11
- ICANN Nomcom Extends Deadline for SOIs to 15 May 2013, Ole Jacobsen, 21:10
- Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, Mark Andrews, 21:09
- Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, Dave Crocker, 21:09
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Ralph Droms, 21:08
- Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, David Conrad, 21:07
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, David Meyer, 15:58
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Randy Bush, 15:42
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Jari Arkko, 15:32
- Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, Dave Crocker, 15:21
- Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, David Conrad, 14:57
- Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, David Conrad, 14:55
- Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:29
- Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, Dave Crocker, 13:13
- Re: Do we have an estimated date for completing the IESG selection process for this year?, Yoav Nir, 13:09
- Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, David Conrad, 13:08
- Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, Edward Lewis, 13:02
- Appointment of Deborah Brungard as new IETF Liaison Manager to the ITU-T for MPLS, IAB Chair, 12:38
- Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, Dave Crocker, 12:14
- Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, Doug Barton, 12:11
- Call for Technical Plenary Topics, IAB Chair, 11:37
- Gen-art telechat review: draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analysis-06.txt, Robert Sparks, 11:33
- Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, Alessandro Vesely, 11:29
- Re: [IETF] Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, t.p., 11:00
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, t.p., 10:49
- Re: [renum] Gen-art review: draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analysis-05.txt, joel jaeggli, 10:43
- Re: [renum] Gen-art review: draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analysis-05.txt, Robert Sparks, 10:35
- Re: Do we have an estimated date for completing the IESG selection process for this year?, Martin Stiemerling, 10:21
- Re: [netmod] Last Call: <draft-ietf-netmod-interfaces-cfg-10.txt> (A YANG Data Model for Interface Management) to Proposed Standard, Ladislav Lhotka, 10:04
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-netmod-interfaces-cfg-10.txt> (A YANG Data Model for Interface Management) to Proposed Standard, Martin Bjorklund, 10:03
- Re: [netmod] Last Call: <draft-ietf-netmod-interfaces-cfg-10.txt> (A YANG Data Model for Interface Management) to Proposed Standard, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata), 09:33
- Re: [netmod] Last Call: <draft-ietf-netmod-interfaces-cfg-10.txt> (A YANG Data Model for Interface Management) to Proposed Standard, Benoit Claise, 06:27
- Re: [netmod] Last Call: <draft-ietf-netmod-interfaces-cfg-10.txt> (A YANG Data Model for Interface Management) to Proposed Standard, Benoit Claise, 06:08
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Abdussalam Baryun, 05:55
- Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-ietf-netmod-interfaces-cfg-10.txt> (A YANG Data Model for Interface Management) to Proposed Standard, Benoit Claise, 05:48
- Re: How does the IETF evolve to continue to be an effective, efficient, and relevant source of high quality Internet standards? Was: Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, S Moonesamy, 04:04
- Re: User Culture or Management (was Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?), Abdussalam Baryun, 00:20
April 29, 2013
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Sam Hartman, 21:33
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Brian E Carpenter, 20:02
- Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, S Moonesamy, 19:44
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Barry Leiba, 18:51
- Do we have an estimated date for completing the IESG selection process for this year?, Ted Hardie, 18:19
- Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, Mark Andrews, 18:09
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Dan Harkins, 17:44
- Re: W3C standards and the Hollyweb, Dale R. Worley, 17:01
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Dave Crocker, 16:28
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Michael StJohns, 16:21
- Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, Hector Santos, 16:18
- Re: [IETF] Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Warren Kumari, 16:01
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Joe Abley, 15:56
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Sam Hartman, 15:49
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Dan Harkins, 15:41
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Dave Crocker, 15:40
- How does the IETF evolve to continue to be an effective, efficient, and relevant source of high quality Internet standards? Was: Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Michael StJohns, 15:16
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Stewart Bryant, 15:04
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Sam Hartman, 14:39
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Margaret Wasserman, 14:30
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Michael StJohns, 14:29
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Michael StJohns, 14:17
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Michael StJohns, 14:04
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Michael StJohns, 13:48
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Lou Berger, 13:31
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Ted Lemon, 12:38
- RE: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, John E Drake, 12:19
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, John C Klensin, 12:09
- Re: [IAB] Call for Comment: 'Privacy Considerations for Internet Protocols', Alissa Cooper, 12:05
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Melinda Shore, 11:52
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Dave Crocker, 11:46
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, John C Klensin, 11:39
- Re: [dhcwg] RE : Gen-art review: draft-ietf-dhc-triggered-reconfigure-05, Ted Lemon, 11:38
- RE: [dhcwg] RE : Gen-art review: draft-ietf-dhc-triggered-reconfigure-05, Bernie Volz (volz), 10:49
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-07, Ted Lemon, 09:37
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Dave Crocker, 09:12
- RE: [dhcwg] RE : Gen-art review: draft-ietf-dhc-triggered-reconfigure-05, mohamed.boucadair, 09:11
- RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-07, Black, David, 09:10
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-07, Sam Hartman, 09:10
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-netmod-interfaces-cfg-10, Martin Bjorklund, 09:09
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-netmod-interfaces-cfg-10, Martin Bjorklund, 09:08
- RE: [dhcwg] RE : Gen-art review: draft-ietf-dhc-triggered-reconfigure-05, Bernie Volz (volz), 09:08
- RE : [dhcwg] Gen-art review: draft-ietf-dhc-triggered-reconfigure-05, mohamed.boucadair, 09:07
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-07, Black, David, 09:06
- Re: [dhcwg] RE : Gen-art review: draft-ietf-dhc-triggered-reconfigure-05, Robert Sparks, 08:45
- RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-netmod-interfaces-cfg-10, Roni Even, 04:42
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Stewart Bryant, 04:15
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Stewart Bryant, 04:11
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Stewart Bryant, 03:56
- RE: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Christian Huitema, 01:19
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Dave Crocker, 00:57
- RE: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Christian Huitema, 00:55
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Dave Crocker, 00:34
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Last Call: <draft-sheffer-running-code-04.txt> (Improving Awareness of Running Code: the Implementation Status Section) to Experimental RFC, Abdussalam Baryun, 00:31
April 28, 2013
- Re: last call comments for draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-06, Randy Presuhn, 23:06
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Michael StJohns, 23:05
- What's a reasonable and non-discriminatory patent license?, John Levine, 22:15
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Glen Zorn, 20:20
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Margaret Wasserman, 19:53
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Last Call: <draft-sheffer-running-code-04.txt> (Improving Awareness of Running Code: the Implementation Status Section) to Experimental RFC, Dave Crocker, 17:06
- Re: Last Call: <draft-sheffer-running-code-04.txt> (Improving Awareness of Running Code: the Implementation Status Section) to Experimental RFC, Yaron Sheffer, 10:04
- RE: [Tools-discuss] Last Call: <draft-sheffer-running-code-04.txt> (Improving Awareness of Running Code: the Implementation Status Section) to Experimental RFC, John C Klensin, 09:36
- RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-netmod-interfaces-cfg-10, Roni Even, 07:32
- RE: Last Call: <draft-sheffer-running-code-04.txt> (Improving Awareness of Running Code: the Implementation Status Section) to Experimental RFC, Adrian Farrel, 06:43
- RE: [Tools-discuss] Last Call: <draft-sheffer-running-code-04.txt> (Improving Awareness of Running Code: the Implementation Status Section) to Experimental RFC, Adrian Farrel, 06:23
- RE: [Tools-discuss] Last Call: <draft-sheffer-running-code-04.txt> (Improving Awareness of Running Code: the Implementation Status Section) to Experimental RFC, Adrian Farrel, 06:22
- Re: Biggest Fake Conference in Computer Science, Abdussalam Baryun, 06:01
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-netmod-interfaces-cfg-10, Roni Even, 03:32
April 27, 2013
- Re: Last Call: <draft-saintandre-impp-call-info-02.txt> (Instant Messaging and Presence Purpose for the Call-Info Header Field in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)) to Proposed Standard, SM, 18:30
- Re: W3C standards and the Hollyweb, Brian E Carpenter, 14:53
- Re: Biggest Fake Conference in Computer Science, Brian E Carpenter, 14:51
- Biggest Fake Conference in Computer Science, johnsonhammond2, 13:23
- RE: Last Call: <draft-sheffer-running-code-04.txt> (Improving Awareness of Running Code: the Implementation Status Section) to Experimental RFC, John C Klensin, 10:30
- Re: W3C standards and the Hollyweb, Alessandro Vesely, 03:03
- Re: W3C standards and the Hollyweb, Mark Nottingham, 01:40
April 26, 2013
- Re: W3C standards and the Hollyweb, Bjoern Hoehrmann, 20:01
- Re: W3C standards and the Hollyweb, SM, 18:13
- Re: W3C standards and the Hollyweb, Martin Rex, 16:54
- Re: W3C standards and the Hollyweb, Stephen Farrell, 16:41
- Re: W3C standards and the Hollyweb, Josh Howlett, 16:24
- Re: W3C standards and the Hollyweb, Tim Bray, 15:55
- Re: W3C standards and the Hollyweb, Brian E Carpenter, 14:59
- RE: Last Call: <draft-sheffer-running-code-04.txt> (Improving Awareness of Running Code: the Implementation Status Section) to Experimental RFC, SM, 14:52
- Re: last call comments for draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-06, Fernando Gont, 14:19
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-06.txt> (A method for Generating Stable Privacy-Enhanced Addresses with IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration (SLAAC)) to Proposed Standard, Fernando Gont, 14:14
- Re: last call comments for draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-06, Fernando Gont, 14:06
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Last Call: <draft-sheffer-running-code-04.txt> (Improving Awareness of Running Code: the Implementation Status Section) to Experimental RFC, John C Klensin, 11:51
- Re: RE : [dhcwg] Gen-art review: draft-ietf-dhc-triggered-reconfigure-05, Robert Sparks, 11:19
- Re: Last Call: <draft-sheffer-running-code-04.txt> (Improving Awareness of Running Code: the Implementation Status Section) to Experimental RFC, Dave Crocker, 11:17
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Last Call: <draft-sheffer-running-code-04.txt> (Improving Awareness of Running Code: the Implementation Status Section) to Experimental RFC, Fred Baker (fred), 11:07
- Gen-art review: draft-ietf-dhc-triggered-reconfigure-05, Robert Sparks, 10:42
- Re: last call comments for draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-06, Michael Richardson, 07:48
- Call for IESG narrative scribe volunteers, IETF Chair, 07:03
- Re: W3C standards and the Hollyweb, Alessandro Vesely, 06:38
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Last Call: <draft-sheffer-running-code-04.txt> (Improving Awareness of Running Code: the Implementation Status Section) to Experimental RFC, Yaron Sheffer, 04:12
- Re: last call comments for draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-06, Ole Troan, 04:11
- RE: Last Call: <draft-sheffer-running-code-04.txt> (Improving Awareness of Running Code: the Implementation Status Section) to Experimental RFC, Adrian Farrel, 01:43
- Re: Last Call: <draft-sheffer-running-code-04.txt> (Improving Awareness of Running Code: the Implementation Status Section) to Experimental RFC, Abdussalam Baryun, 01:27
April 25, 2013
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:54
- Re: last call comments for draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-06, Andrew McGregor, 22:43
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-06, Ben Campbell, 22:13
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-06, Fernando Gont, 20:13
- Re: W3C standards and the Hollyweb, Mark Nottingham, 19:54
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-06, Ben Campbell, 19:52
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-06, Ben Campbell, 19:44
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Last Call: <draft-sheffer-running-code-04.txt> (Improving Awareness of Running Code: the Implementation Status Section) to Experimental RFC, Abdussalam Baryun, 19:35
- Last Call: <draft-sheffer-running-code-04.txt>, Brian Trammell, 18:53
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-06, Fernando Gont, 18:43
- Re: Last Call: <draft-sheffer-running-code-04.txt> (Improving Awareness of Running Code: the Implementation Status Section) to Experimental RFC, SM, 18:25
- Re: Last Call: <draft-sheffer-running-code-04.txt> (Improving Awareness of Running Code: the Implementation Status Section) to Experimental RFC, Fred Baker, 17:09
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-06.txt> (A method for Generating Stable Privacy-Enhanced Addresses with IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration (SLAAC)) to Proposed Standard, Alissa Cooper, 16:33
- Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-06, Ben Campbell, 15:40
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-07, Sam Hartman, 14:04
- W3C standards and the Hollyweb, Alessandro Vesely, 04:38
- Re: last call comments for draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-06, t.p., 04:07
April 23, 2013
- Re: last call comments for draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-06, Fernando Gont, 20:29
- RE: last call comments for draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-06, Christian Huitema, 19:47
- Re: last call comments for draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-06, Fernando Gont, 16:42
- Re: "emerging regions" IETF/IRTF discussion list, Scott Brim, 12:48
- Re: "emerging regions" IETF/IRTF discussion list, Eggert, Lars, 12:45
- "emerging regions" IETF/IRTF discussion list, Eggert, Lars, 12:41
- Re: last call comments for draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-06, Fernando Gont, 12:40
- RE: last call comments for draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-06, Christian Huitema, 12:03
- RE: last call comments for draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-06, Christian Huitema, 11:43
- Re: last call comments for draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-06, Fernando Gont, 11:37
- Re: last call comments for draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-06, Mark Smith, 11:26
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-netmod-interfaces-cfg-10.txt> (A YANG DataModel for Interface Management) to Proposed Standard, t.p., 06:25
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-netmod-ip-cfg-09.txt> (A YANG Data Modelfor IP Management) to Proposed Standard, t.p., 04:06
- Noreply (was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-netmod-ip-cfg-09.txt> (A YANG Data Model for IP Management) to Proposed Standard), SM, 03:34
April 22, 2013
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-netmod-ip-cfg-09.txt> (A YANG Data Model for IP Management) to Proposed Standard, Pete Resnick, 20:44
- Re: last call comments for draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-06, SM, 15:40
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-netmod-ip-cfg-09.txt> (A YANG Data Model for IP Management) to Proposed Standard, Clint Chaplin, 15:39
- Re: last call comments for draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-06, Eliot Lear, 15:31
- FW: Last Call: <draft-ietf-netmod-interfaces-cfg-10.txt> (A YANG Data Model for Interface Management) to Proposed Standard, David Harrington, 15:21
- Re: last call comments for draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-06, Philipp Kern, 15:03
- RE: The Purpose of WG participants Review (was Re: Purpose of IESG Review), l.wood, 14:54
- Re: last call comments for draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-06, Fernando Gont, 14:41
- Re: last call comments for draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-06, Fernando Gont, 14:23
- Re: last call comments for draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-06, SM, 12:56
- Re: The Purpose of WG participants Review (was Re: Purpose of IESG Review), Joe Touch, 12:27
- Re: last call comments for draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-06, Eliot Lear, 11:22
- Re: last call comments for draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-06, Fernando Gont, 11:07
- Re: last call comments for draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-06, Michael StJohns, 11:03
- Re: The Purpose of WG participants Review (was Re: Purpose of IESG Review), Yoav Nir, 10:16
- Re: last call comments for draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-06, Martin Rex, 09:33
- Re: p1: Via and gateways, Willy Tarreau, 09:02
- Re: p1: Via and gateways, Willy Tarreau, 09:02
- R: R: Last Call Expired: <draft-ietf-ipfix-flow-selection-tech-14.txt>, Salvatore D'Antonio, 09:01
- Re: Meritocracy, diversity, and leaning on the people you know, Riccardo Bernardini, 09:00
- Re: last call comments for draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-06, Sam Hartman, 08:58
- last call comments for draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-06, RJ Atkinson, 08:34
- RE: Meritocracy, diversity, and leaning on the people you know, Moriarty, Kathleen, 08:05
- RE: The Purpose of WG participants Review (was Re: Purpose of IESG Review), l.wood, 07:12
- IAOC Announces Meeting Registration Gender Data Gathering Decision, IETF Administrative Director, 05:30
- Re: Meritocracy, diversity, and leaning on the people you know, Stewart Bryant, 05:05
- last call comments for draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-06, Eliot Lear, 01:21
April 21, 2013
- Re: Meritocracy, diversity, and leaning on the people you know, Margaret Wasserman, 14:50
- Re: Meritocracy, diversity, and leaning on the people you know, Spencer Dawkins, 14:03
- Re: Meritocracy, diversity, and leaning on the people you know, Abdussalam Baryun, 04:50
April 20, 2013
- Re: Meritocracy, diversity, and leaning on the people you know, Melinda Shore, 12:21
- Re: p1: Via and gateways, David Morris, 10:17
- Re: Meritocracy, diversity, and leaning on the people you know, Hector Santos, 09:14
- Re: Meritocracy, diversity, and leaning on the people you know, Abdussalam Baryun, 03:27
- Re: p1: Via and gateways, Mark Nottingham, 02:56
April 19, 2013
- [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01, Joel M. Halpern, 17:24
- Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-iid-registry-update-03, Ben Campbell, 16:03
- Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-ospf-ipv4-embedded-ipv6-routing-11, Ben Campbell, 15:51
- Re: Meritocracy, diversity, and leaning on the people you know, Jari Arkko, 15:33
- Re: Meritocracy, diversity, and leaning on the people you know, Yoav Nir, 15:31
- Re: Meritocracy, diversity, and leaning on the people you know, Ted Hardie, 14:33
- Re: Meritocracy, diversity, and leaning on the people you know, Ted Hardie, 14:31
- Re: Meritocracy, diversity, and leaning on the people you know, Ted Hardie, 14:29
- Re: Meritocracy, diversity, and leaning on the people you know, Riccardo Bernardini, 14:14
- Re: Meritocracy, diversity, and leaning on the people you know, Dave Cridland, 13:47
- Re: Meritocracy, diversity, and leaning on the people you know, Simon Pietro Romano, 13:40
- Re: Meritocracy, diversity, and leaning on the people you know, Riccardo Bernardini, 13:26
- Meritocracy, diversity, and leaning on the people you know, Ted Hardie, 13:14
- RE: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Adrian Farrel, 08:58
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Abdussalam Baryun, 06:22
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 06:07
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 06:04
- RE: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, l.wood, 05:23
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, t.p., 05:09
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Abdussalam Baryun, 04:38
- Re: The Purpose of WG participants Review (was Re: Purpose of IESG Review), Yoav Nir, 04:09
- RE: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, l.wood, 03:31
- RE: The Purpose of WG participants Review (was Re: Purpose of IESG Review), l.wood, 03:29
April 18, 2013
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Dan Harkins, 22:59
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Andrew Sullivan, 20:45
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Ted Lemon, 18:58
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, David Morris, 18:54
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Dan Harkins, 18:23
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Pete Resnick, 17:25
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Dan Harkins, 16:48
- Re: [pkix] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15.txt> (X.509 Internet Public Key Infrastructure Online Certificate Status Protocol - OCSP) to Proposed Standard, Martin Rex, 16:23
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Pete Resnick, 15:51
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Jari Arkko, 15:07
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Ted Lemon, 14:34
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Ted Lemon, 14:04
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, James Polk, 13:34
- RE: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Adrian Farrel, 13:31
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Jari Arkko, 13:00
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Michael StJohns, 12:42
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Dan Harkins, 12:07
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Andy Bierman, 11:11
- RE: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, John E Drake, 11:09
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Eliot Lear, 11:01
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Brian E Carpenter, 10:43
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Carsten Bormann, 10:34
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Pete Resnick, 10:29
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Dan Harkins, 10:17
- Re: The Purpose of WG participants Review (was Re: Purpose of IESG Review), Ted Lemon, 09:33
- RE: The Purpose of WG participants Review (was Re: Purpose of IESG Review), Yoav Nir, 09:31
- RE: The Purpose of WG participants Review (was Re: Purpose of IESG Review), l.wood, 05:12
- Re: The Purpose of WG participants Review (was Re: Purpose of IESG Review), Yoav Nir, 04:03
- RE: The Purpose of WG participants Review (was Re: Purpose of IESG Review), l.wood, 03:32
April 17, 2013
- Re: Fwd: [IAB] Call for Comment: 'Privacy Considerations for Internet Protocols', Dave Crocker, 19:16
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, manning bill, 15:48
- Re: The Purpose of WG participants Review (was Re: Purpose of IESG Review), Dale R. Worley, 15:40
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, manning bill, 15:40
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Eliot Lear, 14:48
- RE: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, SM, 14:45
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Dan Harkins, 14:22
- Re: [pkix] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15.txt> (X.509 Internet Public Key Infrastructure Online Certificate Status Protocol - OCSP) to Proposed Standard, Johannes Merkle, 10:20
- Re: [pkix] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15.txt> (X.509 Internet Public Key Infrastructure Online Certificate Status Protocol - OCSP) to Proposed Standard, Henry B. Hotz, 10:19
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Eliot Lear, 09:53
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, James Polk, 09:08
- RE: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, John E Drake, 06:57
- Where was the standard demanded and how can it be continued used in other?, Abdussalam Baryun, 05:43
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Jari Arkko, 03:26
- RE: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, l.wood, 00:41
April 15, 2013
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Dan Harkins, 19:00
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Jari Arkko, 13:53
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Dan Harkins, 13:18
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Douglas Otis, 12:47
- Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Stephen Farrell, 11:35
- Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Ted Lemon, 11:28
- Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Joe Touch, 11:27
- Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Michael Richardson, 11:24
- Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Elwyn Davies, 11:20
- Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Ted Lemon, 11:09
- Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Joe Touch, 10:36
- Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Fred Baker (fred), 10:29
- Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Brian E Carpenter, 09:45
- Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Ted Lemon, 09:23
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Jari Arkko, 09:15
- Re: R: Last Call Expired: <draft-ietf-ipfix-flow-selection-tech-14.txt>, Benoit Claise, 09:03
- Re: The Purpose of WG participants Review (was Re: Purpose of IESG Review), Klaas Wierenga, 09:03
- RE: [pkix] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15.txt> (X.509 Internet Public Key Infrastructure Online Certificate Status Protocol - OCSP) to Proposed Standard, Piyush Jain, 09:02
- RE: [pkix] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15.txt> (X.509 Internet Public Key Infrastructure Online Certificate Status Protocol - OCSP) to Proposed Standard, Piyush Jain, 09:01
- RE: [pkix] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15.txt> (X.509 Internet Public Key Infrastructure Online Certificate Status Protocol - OCSP) to Proposed Standard, Piyush Jain, 09:01
- Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Andy Bierman, 09:00
- Re: [pkix] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15.txt> (X.509 Internet Public Key Infrastructure Online Certificate Status Protocol - OCSP) to Proposed Standard, Henry B. Hotz, 08:59
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Ted Lemon, 08:51
- Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Jari Arkko, 08:09
- Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-ipfix-flow-selection-tech-14.txt, Benoit Claise, 04:36
- Re: Purpose of IESG Review, t.p., 04:12
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, t.p., 03:49
April 13, 2013
- RE: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Christian Huitema, 22:18
- Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Murray S. Kucherawy, 19:27
- Re: [pkix] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15.txt> (X.509 Internet Public Key Infrastructure Online Certificate Status Protocol - OCSP) to Proposed Standard, Stefan Santesson, 18:24
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Andrew Sullivan, 17:03
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, SM, 14:46
- Open standards (was: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?), SM, 13:29
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Michael Richardson, 13:11
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Michael Richardson, 13:02
- Re: [pkix] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15.txt> (X.509 Internet Public Key Infrastructure Online Certificate Status Protocol - OCSP) to Proposed Standard, Stefan Santesson, 12:36
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Stephen Farrell, 12:33
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Lou Berger, 12:17
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Michael StJohns, 12:06
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Melinda Shore, 11:57
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, John C Klensin, 11:16
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Eliot Lear, 10:48
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Ray Pelletier, 10:18
- RE: Purpose of IESG Review, John C Klensin, 08:38
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Toerless Eckert, 07:59
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Stephen Farrell, 07:47
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Ted Lemon, 07:32
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Lou Berger, 07:10
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Arturo Servin, 05:45
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, SM, 05:23
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, SM, 04:42
- Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Stewart Bryant, 04:17
- Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Stewart Bryant, 03:13
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Eliot Lear, 02:13
- Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Brian E Carpenter, 02:06
- Re: [pkix] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15.txt> (X.509 Internet Public Key Infrastructure Online Certificate Status Protocol - OCSP) to Proposed Standard, Stefan Santesson, 02:03
- Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Abdussalam Baryun, 01:55
- Re: The Purpose of WG participants Review (was Re: Purpose of IESG Review), Abdussalam Baryun, 01:37
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Scott Kitterman, 00:37
April 12, 2013
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Andrew Sullivan, 22:38
- Re: [OPSEC] Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets-03.txt> (Security Implications of IPv6 on IPv4 Networks) to Informational RFC, Fernando Gont, 22:30
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Spencer Dawkins, 22:11
- RE: Purpose of IESG Review, l.wood, 21:49
- Re: [pkix] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15.txt> (X.509 Internet Public Key Infrastructure Online Certificate Status Protocol - OCSP) to Proposed Standard, Martin Rex, 21:35
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Melinda Shore, 21:22
- Re: Last Call: <draft-sheffer-running-code-04.txt> (Improving Awareness of Running Code: the Implementation Status Section) to Experimental RFC, Barry Leiba, 21:12
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Ted Lemon, 20:51
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Martin Rex, 18:55
- RE: Purpose of IESG Review, Pat Thaler, 18:51
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, SM, 18:41
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Michael Richardson, 18:13
- Re: Purpose of IESG Review, John C Klensin, 17:19
- Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Arturo Servin, 16:32
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Lou Berger, 16:27
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Ted Lemon, 16:06
- Re: Purpose of IESG Review, t.p., 15:58
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, James Polk, 15:37
- Re: The Purpose of WG participants Review (was Re: Purpose of IESG Review), Arturo Servin, 15:34
- Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Arturo Servin, 15:22
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Andrew Sullivan, 15:17
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, SM, 15:06
- The Purpose of WG participants Review (was Re: Purpose of IESG Review), Abdussalam Baryun, 14:59
- Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Melinda Shore, 14:33
- Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Arturo Servin, 14:29
- Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Abdussalam Baryun, 14:24
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Melinda Shore, 14:11
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Lou Berger, 14:05
- Re: [pkix] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15.txt> (X.509 Internet Public Key Infrastructure Online Certificate Status Protocol - OCSP) to Proposed Standard, Henry B. Hotz, 14:02
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Melinda Shore, 13:33
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Toerless Eckert, 13:14
- Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Martin Rex, 13:04
- Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Ted Lemon, 11:31
- Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Brian E Carpenter, 11:22
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Douglas Otis, 11:01
- Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Martin Rex, 10:26
- Re: draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01, David Farmer, 10:16
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Spencer Dawkins, 09:39
- Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Brian E Carpenter, 08:51
- Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Fred Baker (fred), 08:17
- Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Dave Crocker, 07:23
- Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Abdussalam Baryun, 04:33
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, t.p., 03:26
- Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Brian E Carpenter, 02:13
- Re: Purpose of IESG Review, John Leslie, 01:10
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, SM, 01:08
April 11, 2013
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: [pkix] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15.txt> (X.509 Internet Public Key Infrastructure Online Certificate Status Protocol - OCSP) to Proposed Standard, Stefan Santesson, 23:38
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Melinda Shore, 19:41
- Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Fred Baker (fred), 19:28
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Michael Richardson, 17:54
- Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Joe Touch, 17:42
- RE: Purpose of IESG Review, Adrian Farrel, 17:18
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Dave Crocker, 17:10
- Re: Purpose of IESG Review, John Leslie, 17:08
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Toerless Eckert, 16:41
- RE: Purpose of IESG Review, Adrian Farrel, 16:17
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Ted Lemon, 16:15
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, David Meyer, 16:10
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Ted Lemon, 16:07
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, David Meyer, 15:51
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Spencer Dawkins, 15:47
- RE: Purpose of IESG Review, l.wood, 15:40
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, John C Klensin, 15:38
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Michael StJohns, 15:27
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Ted Lemon, 15:21
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Spencer Dawkins, 15:19
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Yoav Nir, 15:09
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, SM, 14:51
- Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Paul Hoffman, 13:55
- IAB Appoints Jonne Soininen as Liaison to the ICANN Board, IAB Chair, 13:37
- Re: Sufficient email authentication requirements for IPv6, Hector Santos, 13:24
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Toerless Eckert, 12:59
- Purpose of IESG Review, Joe Touch, 12:55
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Toerless Eckert, 12:26
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Arturo Servin, 12:20
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Thomas D. Nadeau, 11:58
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Toerless Eckert, 11:56
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Arturo Servin, 11:33
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Melinda Shore, 11:09
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Ted Hardie, 11:06
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Toerless Eckert, 11:03
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Dave Crocker, 10:45
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Arturo Servin, 10:18
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Ray Pelletier, 10:17
- Re: Sufficient email authentication requirements for IPv6, Arturo Servin, 10:14
- IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, Ray Pelletier, 10:11
- RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pcp-upnp-igd-interworking-07, mohamed.boucadair, 10:03
- Re: Sufficient email authentication requirements for IPv6, Arturo Servin, 09:17
April 10, 2013
- Re: Sufficient email authentication requirements for IPv6, Keith Moore, 18:24
- Re: Sufficient email authentication requirements for IPv6, John R Levine, 18:14
- Re: Sufficient email authentication requirements for IPv6, Keith Moore, 18:07
- Re: Sufficient email authentication requirements for IPv6, John Levine, 17:56
- RE: question about draft-touch-tcp-ao-nat, Adrian Farrel, 16:29
- Re: Sufficient email authentication requirements for IPv6, Douglas Otis, 12:43
- RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pcp-upnp-igd-interworking-07, Peter Yee, 11:51
- Re: question about draft-touch-tcp-ao-nat, Joe Touch, 11:29
- Re: [OPSEC] Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets-03.txt> (Security Implications of IPv6 on IPv4 Networks) to Informational RFC, Brian E Carpenter, 11:11
- RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pcp-upnp-igd-interworking-07, mohamed.boucadair, 10:18
- RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-06, mohamed.boucadair, 10:17
- Re: Sufficient email authentication requirements for IPv6, Keith Moore, 08:31
- Re: [IAB] Call for Comment: 'Privacy Considerations for Internet Protocols', Alissa Cooper, 07:27
- Re: [pkix] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15.txt> (X.509 Internet Public Key Infrastructure Online Certificate Status Protocol - OCSP) to Proposed Standard, Stefan Santesson, 04:08
- Re: Sufficient email authentication requirements for IPv6, SM, 00:39
- Re: [OPSEC] Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets-03.txt> (Security Implications of IPv6 on IPv4 Networks) to Informational RFC, Fernando Gont, 00:19
April 09, 2013
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-savi-threat-scope-07, Ted Lemon, 19:28
- Re: Sufficient email authentication requirements for IPv6, John Levine, 19:05
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-savi-threat-scope-07, Russ Housley, 17:34
- Re: Proposed solution for DPEP (Diversity Problem Entry Point) - IETF April 1 jokes., Donald Eastlake, 16:40
- Re: Sufficient email authentication requirements for IPv6, Douglas Otis, 14:20
- Re: Sufficient email authentication requirements for IPv6, SM, 13:57
- RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pcp-upnp-igd-interworking-07, Peter Yee, 13:56
- Re: Sufficient email authentication requirements for IPv6, Douglas Otis, 12:17
- Re: Sufficient email authentication requirements for IPv6, Keith Moore, 11:55
- R: Last Call Expired: <draft-ietf-ipfix-flow-selection-tech-14.txt>, Salvatore D'Antonio, 10:57
- RE: [pkix] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15.txt> (X.509 Internet Public Key Infrastructure Online Certificate Status Protocol - OCSP) to Proposed Standard, Piyush Jain, 10:56
- Re: [pkix] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15.txt> (X.509 Internet Public Key Infrastructure Online Certificate Status Protocol - OCSP) to Proposed Standard, Henry B. Hotz, 10:55
- RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pcp-upnp-igd-interworking-07, mohamed.boucadair, 10:54
- videos and blog posts on home networking, buffer bloat, IETF Chair, 05:26
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pcp-upnp-igd-interworking-07, Peter Yee, 03:11
- RE: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, l.wood, 02:02
- Re: Sufficient email authentication requirements for IPv6, joel jaeggli, 00:26
April 08, 2013
- Re: Sufficient email authentication requirements for IPv6, Douglas Otis, 23:17
- Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Bob Braden, 16:37
- Re: Proposed solution for DPEP (Diversity Problem Entry Point) - IETF April 1 jokes., Yoav Nir, 16:10
- Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Scott Brim, 14:33
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-ethernet-addressing-05, Richard Barnes, 14:32
- Re: Proposed solution for DPEP (Diversity Problem Entry Point) - IETF April 1 jokes., Måns Nilsson, 14:18
- Re: draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01, John Curran, 13:44
- Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Lucy Lynch, 12:33
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, Keith Moore, 11:28
- RE: Proposed solution for DPEP (Diversity Problem Entry Point) - IETF April 1 jokes., Pat Thaler, 11:23
- Re: draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01, David Farmer, 11:04
- Re: Proposed solution for DPEP (Diversity Problem Entry Point) - IETF April 1 jokes., Ted Lemon, 10:37
- Re: team to look at diversity, Dave Crocker, 09:34
- Re: [pkix] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15.txt> (X.509 Internet Public Key Infrastructure Online Certificate Status Protocol - OCSP) to Proposed Standard, Sean Turner, 09:32
- Re: [pkix] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15.txt> (X.509 Internet Public Key Infrastructure Online Certificate Status Protocol - OCSP to Proposed Standard, Sean Turner, 09:31
- Re: team to look at diversity, Dave Crocker, 09:29
- Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Wes Beebee (wbeebee), 09:25
- Re: Proposed solution for DPEP (Diversity Problem Entry Point) - IETF April 1 jokes., Melinda Shore, 08:56
- Re: Proposed solution for DPEP (Diversity Problem Entry Point) - IETF April 1 jokes., Ted Lemon, 08:49
- Re: Proposed solution for DPEP (Diversity Problem Entry Point) - IETF April 1 jokes., Melinda Shore, 08:36
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-iid-registry-update-00, Stewart Bryant, 08:20
- Re: Proposed solution for DPEP (Diversity Problem Entry Point) - IETF April 1 jokes., Ted Lemon, 06:31
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-ethernet-addressing-05, Stewart Bryant, 05:52
- Re: Proposed solution for DPEP (Diversity Problem Entry Point) - IETF April 1 jokes., Måns Nilsson, 05:36
- Re: Proposed solution for DPEP (Diversity Problem Entry Point) - IETF April 1 jokes., Melinda Shore, 03:29
- Re: Proposed solution for DPEP (Diversity Problem Entry Point) - IETF April 1 jokes., Måns Nilsson, 02:20
April 07, 2013
- draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01, Russ Housley, 20:33
- Re: [IETF] Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Mark Nottingham, 19:53
- Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Noel Chiappa, 17:52
- Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Andrew Sullivan, 17:31
- Proposed solution for DPEP (Diversity Problem Entry Point) - IETF April 1 jokes., Hector Santos, 15:58
- Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Murray S. Kucherawy, 15:30
- Re: [IETF] Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Måns Nilsson, 14:40
- Re: [IETF] Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Yoav Nir, 14:30
- Re: [IETF] Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Bob Braden, 13:26
- Re: [IETF] Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Måns Nilsson, 10:39
- Re: [IETF] Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, John Levine, 10:14
- Re: [core] tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-core-coap-14, Carsten Bormann, 08:02
- RE: [IETF] Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Yoav Nir, 06:58
- RE: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, l.wood, 06:23
- Re: [IETF] Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Margaret Wasserman, 00:34
April 06, 2013
- Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Hector Santos, 17:19
- Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Yoav Nir, 16:57
- Re: [IETF] Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Abdussalam Baryun, 16:56
- Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Melinda Shore, 16:38
- Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Ulrich Herberg, 16:31
- Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Dave Cridland, 16:21
- Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Elwyn Davies, 15:24
- Re: [IETF] Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Abdussalam Baryun, 12:47
- Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Melinda Shore, 12:37
- Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Abdussalam Baryun, 12:34
- Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Tim Chown, 12:14
- Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Abdussalam Baryun, 12:10
- Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Heasley, 12:08
- Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, David Morris, 12:01
- Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Scott Brim, 10:56
- Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Hector Santos, 10:52
- Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Stewart Bryant (stbryant), 10:38
- Re: draft-sheffer-running-code-03 published, Barry Leiba, 10:15
- Re: Less Corporate Diversity, Keith Moore, 10:11
- RE: draft-sheffer-running-code-03 published, Adrian Farrel, 09:57
- Re: draft-sheffer-running-code-03 published, Barry Leiba, 09:40
- Re: [IETF] Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Warren Kumari, 09:25
- Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Dave Cridland, 09:07
- Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Abdussalam Baryun, 08:02
- Re: RFC 6921 on Design Considerations for Faster-Than-Light (FTL) Communication, Ted Lemon, 06:48
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets-03, Roni Even, 05:43
- Re: RFC 6921 on Design Considerations for Faster-Than-Light (FTL) Communication, Brian E Carpenter, 02:20
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets-03, Roni Even, 02:09
April 05, 2013
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-06, Peter Yee, 18:53
- Re: RFC 6921 on Design Considerations for Faster-Than-Light (FTL) Communication, James Polk, 18:11
- Re: RFC 6921 on Design Considerations for Faster-Than-Light (FTL) Communication, Dave Cridland, 15:58
- draft-sheffer-running-code-03 published, Yaron Sheffer, 15:26
- Re: (Former) IETF Chair Interview, Russ Housley, 13:16
- (Former) IETF Chair Interview, Russ Housley, 13:13
- Re: RFC 6921 on Design Considerations for Faster-Than-Light (FTL) Communication, Dave Crocker, 12:46
- Re: RFC 6921 on Design Considerations for Faster-Than-Light (FTL) Communication, Wes Beebee (wbeebee), 12:11
- Re: RFC 6921 on Design Considerations for Faster-Than-Light (FTL) Communication, Bob Hinden, 11:41
- Re: [nfsv4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc3530bis-25.txt> (Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Nico Williams, 10:36
- Re: [nfsv4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc3530bis-25.txt> (Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Benjamin Kaduk, 10:35
- Re: [secdir] [nfsv4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc3530bis-25.txt> (Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Nico Williams, 10:34
- Re: RFC 6921 on Design Considerations for Faster-Than-Light (FTL) Communication, Ted Lemon, 09:34
- Re: RFC 6921 on Design Considerations for Faster-Than-Light (FTL) Communication, Spencer Dawkins, 09:28
- Re: RFC 6921 on Design Considerations for Faster-Than-Light (FTL) Communication, John C Klensin, 09:25
- Re: RFC 6921 on Design Considerations for Faster-Than-Light (FTL) Communication, Steve Crocker, 09:06
- Re: RFC 6921 on Design Considerations for Faster-Than-Light (FTL) Communication, Michael Richardson, 08:57
- Re: Less Corporate Diversity, Abdussalam Baryun, 04:44
- Re: RFC 6921 on Design Considerations for Faster-Than-Light (FTL) Communication, Loa Andersson, 04:39
- RE: RFC 6921 on Design Considerations for Faster-Than-Light (FTL) Communication, Adrian Farrel, 04:11
- Re: RFC 6921 on Design Considerations for Faster-Than-Light (FTL) Communication, Brian E Carpenter, 04:09
- Re: RFC 6921 on Design Considerations for Faster-Than-Light (FTL) Communication, Dave Cridland, 04:02
- Re: RFC 6921 on Design Considerations for Faster-Than-Light (FTL) Communication, Loa Andersson, 03:46
- CALL FOR CANDIDATES FOR ITOJUN SERVICE AWARD, Jun Murai, 02:22
April 04, 2013
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:52
- Re: Less Corporate Diversity, Jari Arkko, 12:21
- Re: Less Corporate Diversity, joel jaeggli, 11:54
- Re: Sufficient email authentication requirements for IPv6, Hector Santos, 10:15
- RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-savi-threat-scope-07, Black, David, 10:14
- Re: [secdir] [nfsv4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc3530bis-25.txt> (Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Nico Williams, 10:14
April 03, 2013
- Re: [nfsv4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc3530bis-25.txt> (Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Haynes, Tom, 23:13
- Re: Sufficient email authentication requirements for IPv6, Doug Barton, 20:29
- Re: Sufficient email authentication requirements for IPv6, Ted Lemon, 19:00
- Re: Sufficient email authentication requirements for IPv6, Dean Willis, 17:15
- Re: Missing requirement in draft-sparks-genarea-imaparch? (was Re: New Version Notification - draft-sparks-genarea-imaparch-05.txt), Dave Crocker, 11:43
- Re: Missing requirement in draft-sparks-genarea-imaparch? (was Re: New Version Notification - draft-sparks-genarea-imaparch-05.txt), Russ Housley, 11:22
- Re: Missing requirement in draft-sparks-genarea-imaparch? (was Re: New Version Notification - draft-sparks-genarea-imaparch-05.txt), Dave Crocker, 11:21
- Re: Missing requirement in draft-sparks-genarea-imaparch? (was Re: New Version Notification - draft-sparks-genarea-imaparch-05.txt), Russ Housley, 11:09
- Re: Missing requirement in draft-sparks-genarea-imaparch? (was Re: New Version Notification - draft-sparks-genarea-imaparch-05.txt), Pete Resnick, 10:52
- Re: Missing requirement in draft-sparks-genarea-imaparch? (was Re: New Version Notification - draft-sparks-genarea-imaparch-05.txt), Robert Sparks, 09:46
- Re: Missing requirement in draft-sparks-genarea-imaparch?, Robert Sparks, 09:45
- Re: Missing requirement in draft-sparks-genarea-imaparch? (was Re: New Version Notification - draft-sparks-genarea-imaparch-05.txt), Alexey Melnikov, 08:10
- Re: Missing requirement in draft-sparks-genarea-imaparch? (was Re: New Version Notification - draft-sparks-genarea-imaparch-05.txt), Alexey Melnikov, 08:02
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets-03.txt> (Security Implications of IPv6 on IPv4 Networks) to Informational RFC, Fernando Gont, 02:03
April 02, 2013
- Re: Sufficient email authentication requirements for IPv6, Douglas Otis, 23:28
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets-03.txt> (Security Implications of IPv6 on IPv4 Networks) to Informational RFC, SM, 23:27
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets-03.txt> (Security Implications of IPv6 on IPv4 Networks) to Informational RFC, Ted Lemon, 20:24
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets-03.txt> (Security Implications of IPv6 on IPv4 Networks) to Informational RFC, Fernando Gont, 20:16
- Re: [renum] Gen-art review: draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analysis-05.txt, Stig Venaas, 12:24
- Re: RFC 6921 on Design Considerations for Faster-Than-Light (FTL) Communication, Bob Hinden, 11:20
- Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-use-cases-and-design-06.txt>, Luyuan Fang (lufang), 10:35
- RE: [renum] Gen-art review: draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analysis-05.txt, Liubing (Leo), 10:34
- RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-use-cases-and-design-06.txt>, Doolan, Paul (NSN - US/Irving), 10:33
- Re: Missing requirement in draft-sparks-genarea-imaparch? (was Re: New Version Notification - draft-sparks-genarea-imaparch-05.txt), Eric Burger, 10:33
- RE: Gen-art review: draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analysis-05.txt, Liubing (Leo), 10:32
- Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-use-cases-and-design-06.txt>, Luyuan Fang (lufang), 10:31
- Re: Missing requirement in draft-sparks-genarea-imaparch? (was Re: New Version Notification - draft-sparks-genarea-imaparch-05.txt), Burger Eric, 10:31
- Re: [nfsv4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc3530bis-25.txt> (Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Benjamin Kaduk, 10:30
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-ethernet-addressing-05, Richard Barnes, 09:27
- Re: RFC 6921 on Design Considerations for Faster-Than-Light (FTL) Communication, Ted Lemon, 08:30
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-ethernet-addressing-05, Stewart Bryant, 08:09
- RE: RFC 6921 on Design Considerations for Faster-Than-Light (FTL) Communication, l.wood, 05:44
- Re: [renum] Gen-art review: draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analysis-05.txt, Brian E Carpenter, 04:57
- Re: [OPSEC] Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets-03.txt> (Security Implications of IPv6 on IPv4 Networks) to Informational RFC, Brian E Carpenter, 04:44
- Re: draft-guo-idoca-with-the-html-file-format-00, Susie Lu, 01:35
- Re: team to look at diversity, Carsten Bormann, 01:09
- Re: draft-guo-idoca-with-the-html-file-format-00, Kun Yang, 00:46
- team to look at diversity, Jari Arkko, 00:10
April 01, 2013
- Re: RFC 6921 on Design Considerations for Faster-Than-Light (FTL) Communication, SM, 21:04
- Re: RFC 6921 on Design Considerations for Faster-Than-Light (FTL) Communication, Abdussalam Baryun, 19:48
- Re: RFC 6921 on Design Considerations for Faster-Than-Light (FTL) Communication, Abdussalam Baryun, 19:45
- Re: Missing requirement in draft-sparks-genarea-imaparch?, Sam Hartman, 18:48
- Re: Missing requirement in draft-sparks-genarea-imaparch? (was Re: New Version Notification - draft-sparks-genarea-imaparch-05.txt), Robert Sparks, 16:40
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets-03.txt> (Security Implications of IPv6 on IPv4 Networks) to Informational RFC, Fernando Gont, 16:32
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets-03.txt> (Security Implications of IPv6 on IPv4 Networks) to Informational RFC, SM, 16:24
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets-03.txt> (Security Implications of IPv6 on IPv4 Networks) to Informational RFC, SM, 16:23
- Gen-art review: draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analysis-05.txt, Robert Sparks, 15:46
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets-03.txt> (Security Implications of IPv6 on IPv4 Networks) to Informational RFC, George, Wes, 13:01
- Re: [OPSEC] Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets-03.txt> (Security Implications of IPv6 on IPv4 Networks) to Informational RFC, Fernando Gont, 13:00
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets-03.txt> (Security Implications of IPv6 on IPv4 Networks) to Informational RFC, Fernando Gont, 12:58
- Re: STEAM: BOF proposal for Berlin, Thierry Moreau, 12:11
- Re: STEAM: BOF proposal for Berlin, Scott Brim, 10:56
- Re: STEAM: BOF proposal for Berlin, Ted Lemon, 10:54
- Re: STEAM: BOF proposal for Berlin, Diana Raft, 10:40
- Re: STEAM: BOF proposal for Berlin, Wes Hardaker, 09:11
- RE: [savi] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-savi-threat-scope-06, Black, David, 09:07
- Re: [pkix] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15, Stefan Santesson, 09:06
- RE: [pkix] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15, Piyush Jain, 09:06
- Re:The Interconnection and Interoperability of Different Cloud-office Applications (IDCOA) with the HTML File Format draft-guo-idoca-with-the-html-file-format-00, Susie Lu, 09:05
- Re: STEAM: BOF proposal for Berlin, Tony Hansen, 06:55
- STEAM: BOF proposal for Berlin, Daniel Raft, 05:53