IETF Discussion (thread)
Mail lost yesterday,
SM,
2013/08/29
- Re: Mail lost yesterday, Bob Hinden, 2013/08/29
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Mail lost yesterday, SM, 2013/08/29
- Re: Mail lost yesterday, Jari Arkko, 2013/08/30
- Re: Mail lost yesterday, Mary Barnes, 2013/08/30
- Re: Mail lost yesterday, SM, 2013/08/30
- Re: Mail lost yesterday, Brian E Carpenter, 2013/08/30
- Re: Mail lost yesterday, Yoav Nir, 2013/08/30
RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12,
Mach Chen,
2013/08/29
- RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12, Roni Even, 2013/08/29
- RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12, Mach Chen, 2013/08/29
- RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12, Roni Even, 2013/08/29
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12, Loa Andersson, 2013/08/29
- RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12, Roni Even, 2013/08/29
- Re: Gen-ART LC review ofdraft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12, t.p., 2013/08/29
- RE: Gen-ART LC review ofdraft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12, Roni Even, 2013/08/29
RE: Rude responses,
l.wood,
2013/08/26
- Re: Rude responses, Abdussalam Baryun, 2013/08/27
- Message not available
- Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), Tim Chown, 2013/08/27
- Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 2013/08/27
- Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), Ted Lemon, 2013/08/27
- Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), Scott Brim, 2013/08/27
- Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), Ted Lemon, 2013/08/27
- Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), John Leslie, 2013/08/27
- Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), Ted Lemon, 2013/08/27
- Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), Pete Resnick, 2013/08/27
- Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2013/08/27
- Message not available
- Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), S Moonesamy, 2013/08/27
- Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2013/08/27
- Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), Melinda Shore, 2013/08/27
- Message not available
- Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), S Moonesamy, 2013/08/27
- Re: Rude responses, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 2013/08/27
Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard,
Douglas Otis,
2013/08/23
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, S Moonesamy, 2013/08/24
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Douglas Otis, 2013/08/26
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman, 2013/08/26
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Douglas Otis, 2013/08/26
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman, 2013/08/26
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Douglas Otis, 2013/08/26
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman, 2013/08/26
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, S Moonesamy, 2013/08/26
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Joe Abley, 2013/08/27
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, S Moonesamy, 2013/08/27
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, S Moonesamy, 2013/08/28
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Patrik Fältström, 2013/08/28
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 2013/08/28
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman, 2013/08/28
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 2013/08/29
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 2013/08/29
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 2013/08/29
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2013/08/29
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Mark Andrews, 2013/08/28
Fwd: [dnsext] SPF isn't going to change, was Deprecating SPF,
manning bill,
2013/08/23
- Re: Fwd: [dnsext] SPF isn't going to change, was Deprecating SPF, John Levine, 2013/08/23
- Re: [dnsext] SPF isn't going to change, was Deprecating SPF, manning bill, 2013/08/23
- Re: [dnsext] SPF isn't going to change, was Deprecating SPF, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2013/08/24
- Re: [dnsext] SPF isn't going to change, was Deprecating SPF, Hector Santos, 2013/08/24
- Re: [dnsext] SPF isn't going to change, was Deprecating SPF, Hector Santos, 2013/08/24
- Re: [dnsext] SPF isn't going to change, was Deprecating SPF, Scott Kitterman, 2013/08/24
- SPF PTR Support [was SPF isn't going to change], Hector Santos, 2013/08/24
- Re: SPF PTR Support [was SPF isn't going to change], Scott Kitterman, 2013/08/24
- Re: SPF PTR Support [was SPF isn't going to change], Hector Santos, 2013/08/24
- Message not available
- Re: [dnsext] SPF isn't going to change, was Deprecating SPF, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2013/08/25
- Re: [dnsext] SPF isn't going to change, was Deprecating SPF, bmanning, 2013/08/26
Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard,
Måns Nilsson,
2013/08/19
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, John Levine, 2013/08/19
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Måns Nilsson, 2013/08/19
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman, 2013/08/19
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, David Conrad, 2013/08/19
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman, 2013/08/19
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, John Levine, 2013/08/19
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, David Conrad, 2013/08/19
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman, 2013/08/20
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Randy Bush, 2013/08/20
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 2013/08/20
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Patrik Fältström, 2013/08/20
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 2013/08/20
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Patrik Fältström, 2013/08/20
- Re: [spfbis] prefixed names, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt>, John Levine, 2013/08/20
- Re: [spfbis] prefixed names, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt>, Mark Andrews, 2013/08/20
- Re: [spfbis] prefixed names, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt>, Dave Crocker, 2013/08/20
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Andrew Sullivan, 2013/08/20
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 2013/08/20
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Andrew Sullivan, 2013/08/20
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 2013/08/20
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, David Conrad, 2013/08/20
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Alessandro Vesely, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2013/08/20
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Andrew Sullivan, 2013/08/20
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, David Conrad, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Patrik Fältström, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Eliot Lear, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Patrik Fältström, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Eliot Lear, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Patrik Fältström, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Ted Lemon, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] there is no transitiion, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt>, John Levine, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] there is no transitiion, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt>, Ted Lemon, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Patrik Fältström, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Patrik Fältström, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Pete Resnick, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 2013/08/21
- Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard), Pete Resnick, 2013/08/21
- Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard), Dave Crocker, 2013/08/21
- Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard), Barry Leiba, 2013/08/21
- Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard), Stephen Farrell, 2013/08/21
- RE: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard), l.wood, 2013/08/22
- Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard), Thomas Narten, 2013/08/22
- Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard), S Moonesamy, 2013/08/21
- Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard), Pete Resnick, 2013/08/22
- Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard), Scott Brim, 2013/08/22
- Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard), Pete Resnick, 2013/08/22
- Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard), Barry Leiba, 2013/08/22
- Visibility of shepherd writeup, Carsten Bormann, 2013/08/23
- The Last Call social contract (was - Re: Rude responses), Dave Crocker, 2013/08/22
- RE: The Last Call social contract (was - Re: Rude responses), l.wood, 2013/08/22
- RE: The Last Call social contract (was - Re: Rude responses), Dave Cridland, 2013/08/23
- Re: The Last Call social contract (was - Re: Rude responses), Scott Brim, 2013/08/23
- Re: The Last Call social contract (was - Re: Rude responses), Dave Crocker, 2013/08/23
- Re: The Last Call social contract (was - Re: Rude responses), Hector Santos, 2013/08/23
- Re: The Last Call social contract (was - Re: Rude responses), S Moonesamy, 2013/08/23
- Re: The Last Call social contract (was - Re: Rude responses), Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2013/08/23
- Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard), Abdussalam Baryun, 2013/08/25
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, John Leslie, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, S Moonesamy, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, manning bill, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Andrew Sullivan, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Jelte Jansen, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, S Moonesamy, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Andrew Sullivan, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Hector Santos, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, S Moonesamy, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, John R Levine, 2013/08/19
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Måns Nilsson, 2013/08/19
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, John Levine, 2013/08/19
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Andrew Sullivan, 2013/08/19
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, HLS, 2013/08/19
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Pete Resnick, 2013/08/19
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Pete Resnick, 2013/08/19
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 2013/08/19
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy, 2013/08/19
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 2013/08/19
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Andrew Sullivan, 2013/08/19
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 2013/08/19
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Mark Andrews, 2013/08/19
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Andrew Sullivan, 2013/08/19
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Mark Andrews, 2013/08/19
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Olafur Gudmundsson, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Hector Santos, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Jelte Jansen, 2013/08/22
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Olafur Gudmundsson, 2013/08/22
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy, 2013/08/22
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, John Levine, 2013/08/22
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Jelte Jansen, 2013/08/23
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, John Levine, 2013/08/23
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, S Moonesamy, 2013/08/23
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Jelte Jansen, 2013/08/26
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, John R Levine, 2013/08/26
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Jelte Jansen, 2013/08/26
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, John R Levine, 2013/08/26
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Jelte Jansen, 2013/08/26
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Jelte Jansen, 2013/08/26
- Overloaded TXT harmful (was" Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard), John C Klensin, 2013/08/27
- SPF TYPE support, Hector Santos, 2013/08/19
- Re: SPF TYPE support, Pete Resnick, 2013/08/19
- Re: SPF TYPE support, S Moonesamy, 2013/08/19
- Re: SPF TYPE support, Måns Nilsson, 2013/08/19
- Re: SPF TYPE support, Dave Crocker, 2013/08/20
- Re: [spfbis] SPF TYPE support, Hector Santos, 2013/08/20
- Re: [spfbis] SPF TYPE support, S Moonesamy, 2013/08/20
- Re: [spfbis] SPF TYPE support, Ted Lemon, 2013/08/19
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, S Moonesamy, 2013/08/20
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Hector Santos, 2013/08/20
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, S Moonesamy, 2013/08/20
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Måns Nilsson, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Mark Andrews, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Mark Andrews, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Mark Andrews, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Mark Andrews, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, David Conrad, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Måns Nilsson, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Måns Nilsson, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman, 2013/08/21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Måns Nilsson, 2013/08/22
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Dotzero, 2013/08/20
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Pete Resnick, 2013/08/27
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09.txt> (A Reputation Query Protocol) to Proposed Standard,
SM,
2013/08/15
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09.txt> (A Reputation Query Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy, 2013/08/21
- Message not available
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09.txt> (A Reputation Query Protocol) to Proposed Standard, SM, 2013/08/21
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09.txt> (A Reputation Query Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy, 2013/08/21
- Message not available
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09.txt> (A Reputation Query Protocol) to Proposed Standard, SM, 2013/08/29
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09.txt> (A Reputation Query Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy, 2013/08/29
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09.txt> (A Reputation Query Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Bob Braden, 2013/08/30
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09.txt> (A Reputation Query Protocol) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 2013/08/30
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09.txt> (A Reputation Query Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Hector Santos, 2013/08/30
Call for Review of draft-rfced-rfcxx00-retired, "List of Internet Official Protocol Standards: Replaced by an Online Database",
IAB Chair,
2013/08/14
- Re: Call for Review of draft-rfced-rfcxx00-retired, "List of Internet Official Protocol Standards: Replaced by an Online Database", SM, 2013/08/15
- Re: [IAB] Call for Review of draft-rfced-rfcxx00-retired, "List of Internet Official Protocol Standards: Replaced by an Online Database", Russ Housley, 2013/08/16
- Re: Call for Review of draft-rfced-rfcxx00-retired, "List of Internet Official Protocol Standards: Replaced by an Online Database", John C Klensin, 2013/08/16
- Re: Call for Review of draft-rfced-rfcxx00-retired, "List of Internet Official Protocol Standards: Replaced by an Online Database", Pete Resnick, 2013/08/20
- Re: Call for Review of draft-rfced-rfcxx00-retired, "List of Internet Official Protocol Standards: Replaced by an Online Database", John C Klensin, 2013/08/20
- Re: Call for Review of draft-rfced-rfcxx00-retired, "List of Internet Official Protocol Standards: Replaced by an Online Database", SM, 2013/08/20
- Re: Call for Review of draft-rfced-rfcxx00-retired, "List of Internet Official Protocol Standards: Replaced by an Online Database", Tony Hansen, 2013/08/20
- Re: Call for Review of draft-rfced-rfcxx00-retired, "List of Internet Official Protocol Standards: Replaced by an Online Database", Pete Resnick, 2013/08/20
Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard,
Graham Klyne,
2013/08/13
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard, S Moonesamy, 2013/08/13
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Harald Alvestrand, 2013/08/14
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Graham Klyne, 2013/08/15
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Harald Alvestrand, 2013/08/15
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Hadriel Kaplan, 2013/08/15
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Graham Klyne, 2013/08/16
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Graham Klyne, 2013/08/15
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Harald Alvestrand, 2013/08/15
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Peter Saint-Andre, 2013/08/15
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Harald Alvestrand, 2013/08/15
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Hadriel Kaplan, 2013/08/15
Data collection for remote participation,
Vinayak Hegde,
2013/08/12
- Re: Data collection for remote participation, Alejandro Acosta, 2013/08/12
- Re: Data collection for remote participation, Janet P Gunn, 2013/08/12
- Re: Data collection for remote participation, Vinayak Hegde, 2013/08/12
- Re: Data collection for remote participation, Janet P Gunn, 2013/08/12
- Re: Data collection for remote participation, John Leslie, 2013/08/12
- Radical Solution for remote participants, Douglas Otis, 2013/08/12
- Re: Radical Solution for remote participants, Dave Cridland, 2013/08/13
- Re: Radical Solution for remote participants, John Leslie, 2013/08/13
- Re: Radical Solution for remote participants, John C Klensin, 2013/08/13
- Re: Radical Solution for remote participants, Hadriel Kaplan, 2013/08/16
- Re: Radical Solution for remote participants, Arturo Servin, 2013/08/16
- Re: Radical Solution for remote participants, Hadriel Kaplan, 2013/08/16
- Re: Radical Solution for remote participants, Janet P Gunn, 2013/08/16
- Re: Radical Solution for remote participants, Janet P Gunn, 2013/08/16
- Re: Radical Solution for remote participants, Mark Nottingham, 2013/08/15
- Re: Radical Solution for remote participants, Joel M. Halpern, 2013/08/16
- Re: Radical Solution for remote participants, John C Klensin, 2013/08/16
- Re: Radical Solution for remote participants, Keith Moore, 2013/08/16
- Re: Radical Solution for remote participants, Andy Bierman, 2013/08/16
- Charging remote participants, Hadriel Kaplan, 2013/08/16
- Re: Charging remote participants, Janet P Gunn, 2013/08/16
- Re: Charging remote participants, Keith Moore, 2013/08/16
- Re: Charging remote participants, Turchanyi Geza, 2013/08/16
- Re: Charging remote participants, Arturo Servin, 2013/08/16
- Re: Charging remote participants, Hadriel Kaplan, 2013/08/16
- Re: Charging remote participants, Keith Moore, 2013/08/16
- Re: Charging remote participants, Hadriel Kaplan, 2013/08/16
- Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), SM, 2013/08/18
- Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), Vinayak Hegde, 2013/08/18
- Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), Hadriel Kaplan, 2013/08/18
- Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), John C Klensin, 2013/08/18
- Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), Hadriel Kaplan, 2013/08/18
- Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), John Levine, 2013/08/18
- Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2013/08/18
- Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), SM, 2013/08/18
- Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), John C Klensin, 2013/08/19
- Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), SM, 2013/08/19
- Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), John C Klensin, 2013/08/19
- Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), Scott Kitterman, 2013/08/19
- Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), Hadriel Kaplan, 2013/08/19
- Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), Scott Kitterman, 2013/08/19
- Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), Vinayak Hegde, 2013/08/19
- Re: Academic and open source rate, Arturo Servin, 2013/08/19
- Re: Academic and open source rate, SM, 2013/08/19
- Re: Academic and open source rate, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2013/08/20
- Re: Charging remote participants, Carlos M. Martinez, 2013/08/16
- Re: Charging remote participants, John C Klensin, 2013/08/16
- Re: Charging remote participants, Melinda Shore, 2013/08/16
- Re: Charging remote participants, Hadriel Kaplan, 2013/08/16
- Re: Charging remote participants, Henning Schulzrinne, 2013/08/16
- Re: Charging remote participants, Mark Baugher (mbaugher), 2013/08/16
- Re: Charging remote participants, Henning Schulzrinne, 2013/08/16
- Re: Charging remote participants, Stephen Farrell, 2013/08/17
- Re: Charging remote participants, Hadriel Kaplan, 2013/08/17
- Re: Charging remote participants, John C Klensin, 2013/08/16
- Re: Charging remote participants, Hadriel Kaplan, 2013/08/16
- Re: Charging remote participants, David Morris, 2013/08/16
- Re: Charging remote participants, Janet P Gunn, 2013/08/16
- Re: Charging remote participants, Dave Crocker, 2013/08/16
- Re: Charging remote participants, Hadriel Kaplan, 2013/08/16
- Re: Charging remote participants, Abdussalam Baryun, 2013/08/25
- Re: Charging remote participants, Hadriel Kaplan, 2013/08/25
- Re: Charging remote participants, Janet P Gunn, 2013/08/26
- Re: Charging remote participants, Mikael Abrahamsson, 2013/08/26
- Re: Charging remote participants, Dave Aronson, 2013/08/26
- Re: Charging remote participants, Randy Presuhn, 2013/08/26
- Re: Charging remote participants, Janet P Gunn, 2013/08/26
- Re: Charging remote participants, Janet P Gunn, 2013/08/26
- Re: Charging remote participants, Arturo Servin, 2013/08/26
- Message not available
- Message not available
TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status,
Martin Sustrik,
2013/08/10
- Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Wesley Eddy, 2013/08/10
- Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Martin Sustrik, 2013/08/10
- Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Joe Touch, 2013/08/15
- Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Wesley Eddy, 2013/08/15
- Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Martin Sustrik, 2013/08/16
- Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Joe Touch, 2013/08/16
- Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Martin Sustrik, 2013/08/20
- Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Joe Touch, 2013/08/20
- Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Martin Sustrik, 2013/08/21
- Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Joe Touch, 2013/08/21
- Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Martin Sustrik, 2013/08/21
- Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Joe Touch, 2013/08/21
- Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Martin Sustrik, 2013/08/22
- Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Joe Touch, 2013/08/22
- Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Joe Touch, 2013/08/21
- Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Bob Braden, 2013/08/21
- Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Martin Sustrik, 2013/08/22
- Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Martin Sustrik, 2013/08/16
- Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Joe Touch, 2013/08/16
RPS Accessibility,
Paul Aitken,
2013/08/03
- Re: RPS Accessibility, spromano, 2013/08/03
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Dan York, 2013/08/06
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Dave Crocker, 2013/08/06
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Michael Richardson, 2013/08/06
- Re: RPS Accessibility, Brian Rosen, 2013/08/06
- Re: RPS Accessibility, Michael Richardson, 2013/08/06
- RE: RPS Accessibility, Robin Uyeshiro, 2013/08/06
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Ted Lemon, 2013/08/06
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Joe Abley, 2013/08/06
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Paul Aitken, 2013/08/07
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Ted Lemon, 2013/08/06
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, John Levine, 2013/08/06
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Randy Bush, 2013/08/06
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, John Levine, 2013/08/06
- Faraday cages..., Ted Lemon, 2013/08/07
- Re: Faraday cages..., Chris Elliott, 2013/08/07
- Re: Faraday cages..., Scott Brim, 2013/08/07
- Re: Faraday cages..., Ted Lemon, 2013/08/07
- Re: Faraday cages..., Joe Abley, 2013/08/07
- Re: Faraday cages..., Scott Kitterman, 2013/08/07
- Re: Faraday cages..., Scott Brim, 2013/08/07
- Re: Faraday cages..., Henning Schulzrinne, 2013/08/07
- Re: Faraday cages..., Ole Jacobsen, 2013/08/07
- Re: Faraday cages..., Ted Lemon, 2013/08/07
- RE: Faraday cages..., Christian Huitema, 2013/08/07
- RE: Faraday cages..., John R Levine, 2013/08/07
- Re: Faraday cages..., Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2013/08/08
- Re: Faraday cages..., Ted Lemon, 2013/08/08
- RE: Faraday cages..., Christian Huitema, 2013/08/08
- Re: Faraday cages..., Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2013/08/08
- Re: Faraday cages..., Keith Moore, 2013/08/08
- Re: Faraday cages..., George Michaelson, 2013/08/08
- Re: Faraday cages..., Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2013/08/08
- Re: Faraday cages..., George Michaelson, 2013/08/08
- Re: Faraday cages..., Keith Moore, 2013/08/08
- Re: Faraday cages..., George Michaelson, 2013/08/08
- Re: Faraday cages..., Ted Lemon, 2013/08/09
- Re: Faraday cages..., Keith Moore, 2013/08/10
- Re: Faraday cages..., Scott Kitterman, 2013/08/10
- Re: Faraday cages..., Ted Lemon, 2013/08/10
- Re: Faraday cages..., Mark Andrews, 2013/08/08
- Re: Faraday cages..., Henning Schulzrinne, 2013/08/07
- Re: Faraday cages..., Christopher Morrow, 2013/08/07
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Paul Aitken, 2013/08/07
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Ted Lemon, 2013/08/06
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Ted Lemon, 2013/08/06
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Dave Crocker, 2013/08/06
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Hadriel Kaplan, 2013/08/06
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Ted Lemon, 2013/08/06
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Doug Barton, 2013/08/06
- Re: RPS Accessibility, Doug Barton, 2013/08/06
- Re: RPS Accessibility, Ted Lemon, 2013/08/07
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Martin Rex, 2013/08/06
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Ted Lemon, 2013/08/07
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Hadriel Kaplan, 2013/08/06
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Henning Schulzrinne, 2013/08/06
Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation,
Olle E. Johansson,
2013/08/03
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, John C Klensin, 2013/08/03
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Michael Richardson, 2013/08/04
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, John C Klensin, 2013/08/04
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Ted Lemon, 2013/08/04
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Brian E Carpenter, 2013/08/04
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Scott Brim, 2013/08/04
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Hadriel Kaplan, 2013/08/04
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Stephen Farrell, 2013/08/04
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Melinda Shore, 2013/08/04
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Keith Moore, 2013/08/06
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Andrew Feren, 2013/08/06
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Keith Moore, 2013/08/06
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Andrew Feren, 2013/08/08
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, John C Klensin, 2013/08/08
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Scott Brim, 2013/08/08
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Dave Crocker, 2013/08/08
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Michael Richardson, 2013/08/08
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Hadriel Kaplan, 2013/08/12
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Hadriel Kaplan, 2013/08/12
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Hadriel Kaplan, 2013/08/04
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Spencer Dawkins, 2013/08/04
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Hadriel Kaplan, 2013/08/04
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Spencer Dawkins, 2013/08/04
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Scott Brim, 2013/08/05
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Michael Richardson, 2013/08/05
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, John C Klensin, 2013/08/05
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, James Polk, 2013/08/05
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Stephen Farrell, 2013/08/05
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, John C Klensin, 2013/08/05
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, SM, 2013/08/05
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Hadriel Kaplan, 2013/08/05
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, John Curran, 2013/08/05
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Hadriel Kaplan, 2013/08/04
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Peter Saint-Andre, 2013/08/05
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Dave Cridland, 2013/08/05
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Stephen Farrell, 2013/08/05
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Hadriel Kaplan, 2013/08/05
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Scott Brim, 2013/08/05
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Yoav Nir, 2013/08/05
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Scott Brim, 2013/08/05
Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues,
Chris Griffiths,
2013/08/03
- Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Olaf Kolkman, 2013/08/05
- Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, t.p., 2013/08/08
- Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Chris Griffiths, 2013/08/08
- Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Brian E Carpenter, 2013/08/08
- Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Paul Hoffman, 2013/08/08
- Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Doug Barton, 2013/08/08
- Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Paul Hoffman, 2013/08/08
- Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Jorge Contreras, 2013/08/08
- Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Paul Hoffman, 2013/08/08
- Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Doug Barton, 2013/08/08
- Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, John Levine, 2013/08/08
- Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, John C Klensin, 2013/08/09
- Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Yoav Nir, 2013/08/08
- Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo, 2013/08/09
- Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, John Levine, 2013/08/08
The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org),
Abdussalam Baryun,
2013/08/03
- Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Heasley, 2013/08/03
- Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Andy Bierman, 2013/08/03
- Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Ole Jacobsen (ole), 2013/08/03
- Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Roger Jørgensen, 2013/08/04
- Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Loa Andersson, 2013/08/04
- Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), John Levine, 2013/08/04
- Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Melinda Shore, 2013/08/04
- Message not available
- Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Tim Chown, 2013/08/04
- Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), John C Klensin, 2013/08/04
- Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Jari Arkko, 2013/08/04
- Message not available
- Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Abdussalam Baryun, 2013/08/05
- Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Scott Brim, 2013/08/05
- Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Hadriel Kaplan, 2013/08/05
- Message not available
Anonymity versus Pseudonymity (was Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation),
Adam Roach,
2013/08/02
- Re: Anonymity versus Pseudonymity (was Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation), Scott Brim, 2013/08/02
- Re: Anonymity versus Pseudonymity (was Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation), Brian E Carpenter, 2013/08/02
- Re: Anonymity versus Pseudonymity (was Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation), Lou Berger, 2013/08/02
- Re: Anonymity versus Pseudonymity (was Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation), Olle E. Johansson, 2013/08/03
- Re: Anonymity versus Pseudonymity (was Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation), Yoav Nir, 2013/08/03
- Re: Anonymity versus Pseudonymity (was Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation), Ted Lemon, 2013/08/04
- Re: Anonymity versus Pseudonymity (was Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation), Yoav Nir, 2013/08/04
- Re: Anonymity versus Pseudonymity (was Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation), Ted Lemon, 2013/08/04
- Re: Anonymity versus Pseudonymity (was Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation), John C Klensin, 2013/08/05
- Re: Anonymity versus Pseudonymity (was Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation), Abdussalam Baryun, 2013/08/03
Berlin was awesome, let's come again,
Eggert, Lars,
2013/08/02
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Carsten Bormann, 2013/08/02
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Scott Brim, 2013/08/02
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal), 2013/08/02
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Eggert, Lars, 2013/08/02
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal), 2013/08/02
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Andrew Allen, 2013/08/02
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Mary Barnes, 2013/08/02
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Ole Jacobsen, 2013/08/02
- RE: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Adrian Farrel, 2013/08/02
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Roberto Peon, 2013/08/02
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Ted Lemon, 2013/08/02
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Roberto Peon, 2013/08/02
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Mary Barnes, 2013/08/02
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Ted Lemon, 2013/08/03
- AW: Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich), 2013/08/03
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, John Levine, 2013/08/03
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Yoav Nir, 2013/08/02
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Henning Schulzrinne, 2013/08/02
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Martin Thomson, 2013/08/02
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Yoav Nir, 2013/08/02
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Keith Moore, 2013/08/02
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Michael Richardson, 2013/08/02
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Janet P Gunn, 2013/08/02
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Arturo Servin, 2013/08/02
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, John Levine, 2013/08/03
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Russ Housley, 2013/08/02
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, joel jaeggli, 2013/08/02
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Ted Lemon, 2013/08/02
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Livingood, Jason, 2013/08/02
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Jari Arkko, 2013/08/02
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Mary Barnes, 2013/08/02
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Scott Brim, 2013/08/02
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Randall Gellens, 2013/08/03
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, John C Klensin, 2013/08/03
- Message not available
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Ulrich Herberg, 2013/08/03
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Greg Shepherd, 2013/08/03
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, heasley, 2013/08/03
- Message not available
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Barry Leiba, 2013/08/03
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, John Levine, 2013/08/03
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Barry Leiba, 2013/08/03
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Ulrich Herberg, 2013/08/03
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Martin Rex, 2013/08/06
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Andy Bierman, 2013/08/06
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, John C Klensin, 2013/08/06
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Keith Moore, 2013/08/06
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Douglas Otis, 2013/08/06
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, John Levine, 2013/08/06
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Ted Lemon, 2013/08/07
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo, 2013/08/07
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Noel Chiappa, 2013/08/07
Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org,
Thomas Narten,
2013/08/01
- Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Abdussalam Baryun, 2013/08/03
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 2013/08/08
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 2013/08/15
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 2013/08/22
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 2013/08/29
Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard,
Manger, James H,
2013/08/01
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Manger, James H, 2013/08/02
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Joe Hildebrand, 2013/08/06
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2013/08/06
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Joe Hildebrand, 2013/08/06
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Carsten Bormann, 2013/08/06
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Joe Hildebrand, 2013/08/06
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Carsten Bormann, 2013/08/07
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Barry Leiba, 2013/08/07
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy, 2013/08/07
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2013/08/08
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy, 2013/08/09
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2013/08/08
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Barry Leiba, 2013/08/09
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Martin Thomson, 2013/08/09
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Tim Bray, 2013/08/09
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2013/08/09
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Carsten Bormann, 2013/08/09
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Stephen Farrell, 2013/08/09
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 2013/08/09
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Stephen Farrell, 2013/08/10
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2013/08/09
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Ted Lemon, 2013/08/09
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Hadriel Kaplan, 2013/08/10
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Ted Lemon, 2013/08/10
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Hadriel Kaplan, 2013/08/10
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Ted Lemon, 2013/08/10
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Ted Lemon, 2013/08/10
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Hadriel Kaplan, 2013/08/10
- What RFC 2026 says (was: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt), SM, 2013/08/13
- Re: What RFC 2026 says, Dave Crocker, 2013/08/13
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Yoav Nir, 2013/08/10
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2013/08/10
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Yoav Nir, 2013/08/10
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2013/08/10
- RE: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Larry Masinter, 2013/08/10
- re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Yaron Sheffer, 2013/08/13
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Joe Hildebrand, 2013/08/13
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 2013/08/14
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2013/08/14
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Yaron Sheffer, 2013/08/15
- CBOR and a tag for "critical", Paul Hoffman, 2013/08/15
- Re: CBOR and a tag for "critical", Yaron Sheffer, 2013/08/15
- Re: CBOR and a tag for "critical", Paul Hoffman, 2013/08/15
- Re: CBOR and a tag for "critical", Yaron Sheffer, 2013/08/15
- Re: CBOR and a tag for "critical", Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2013/08/15
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Joe Hildebrand, 2013/08/16
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Yaron Sheffer, 2013/08/17
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Carsten Bormann, 2013/08/17
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Paul Hoffman, 2013/08/13
- re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Randy Presuhn, 2013/08/13
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Yaron Sheffer, 2013/08/14
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Randy Bush, 2013/08/14
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Carsten Bormann, 2013/08/14
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Andy Bierman, 2013/08/14
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Andy Bierman, 2013/08/14
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Yaron Sheffer, 2013/08/14
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Yaron Sheffer, 2013/08/15
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Yaron Sheffer, 2013/08/16
- RE: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Larry Masinter, 2013/08/19
6tsch BoF,
Ralph Droms,
2013/08/01
- Re: 6tsch BoF, Andy Bierman, 2013/08/01
- Re: 6tsch BoF, joel jaeggli, 2013/08/01
- Re: 6tsch BoF, Ralph Droms, 2013/08/01
- Re: 6tsch BoF, manning bill, 2013/08/01
- Re: 6tsch BoF, Yoav Nir, 2013/08/01
- Re: 6tsch BoF, Scott Brim, 2013/08/01
- Re: 6tsch BoF, Andy Bierman, 2013/08/01
- Re: 6tsch BoF, Ralph Droms, 2013/08/01
- Re: 6tsch BoF, Ted Lemon, 2013/08/01
- Message not available
- Re: 6tsch BoF, SM, 2013/08/02
- Re: 6tsch BoF, Ted Lemon, 2013/08/03
- Message not available
- Re: 6tsch BoF, SM, 2013/08/03
- Re: 6tsch BoF, Ted Lemon, 2013/08/03
- Re: 6tsch BoF, Barry Leiba, 2013/08/03
- Re: 6tsch BoF, Scott Brim, 2013/08/03
- Re: 6tsch BoF, Barry Leiba, 2013/08/03
- RE: 6tsch BoF, l.wood, 2013/08/04
- Re: 6tsch BoF, Randy Bush, 2013/08/05
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Protecting the disclosure of the identity (was: Loud humming is subject to cultural bias), SM, 2013/08/01
- Re: 6tsch BoF, Brian E Carpenter, 2013/08/01
- Re: 6tsch BoF, Melinda Shore, 2013/08/01
- Re: 6tsch BoF, SM, 2013/08/01
- Re: 6tsch BoF, Dave Crocker, 2013/08/01