IETF Discussion (date)
February 28, 2014
- We're officially a cabal, John Levine, 17:58
- Re: Ad hominems (was: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions), Murray S. Kucherawy, 17:52
- Re: Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club], Murray S. Kucherawy, 17:44
- Re: A private club, Murray S. Kucherawy, 17:30
- Re: Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club], Theodore Ts'o, 16:11
- Re: Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club], John Levine, 15:45
- Re: Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club], Hector Santos, 12:44
- Re: Filtering email (was: Clarifying IETF process), Chaitanya Dhareshwar, 10:08
- Filtering email (was: Clarifying IETF process), S Moonesamy, 10:03
- Re: Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club], Thomas Narten, 09:57
- Re: Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club], Randy Bush, 09:30
- Re: Ad hominems (was: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions), George, Wes, 09:29
- Re: Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club], Juliao Braga, 09:23
- Re: Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club], Ted Lemon, 09:18
- Re: Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club], Ted Lemon, 09:17
- RE: Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club], l.wood, 07:21
- Re: Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club], Thomas Narten, 06:55
- RE: Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club], l.wood, 06:32
- Re: Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club], Chaitanya Dhareshwar, 06:23
- Re: Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club], Randy Bush, 05:02
- Ad hominems (was: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions), Abdussalam Baryun, 03:54
- Re: Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club], Ted Lemon, 03:49
- Re: Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club], Ted Lemon, 03:45
- Re: Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club], Ted Lemon, 03:44
- US users give the Net a good rap, Robin Whittle, 03:30
- Knowledge and suggestions (was: Re: Ad hominems), Abdussalam Baryun, 02:10
- Re: Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club], Randy Bush, 02:09
February 27, 2014
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club], Theodore Ts'o, 22:07
- Re: Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club], S Moonesamy, 19:52
- Re: Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club], Bjoern Hoehrmann, 19:43
- Re: Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club], John Leslie, 19:37
- Re: Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club], Ted Lemon, 19:07
- Re: Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club], John Leslie, 18:54
- RE: Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club], Adrian Farrel, 12:31
- Re: Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club], S Moonesamy, 12:17
- Re: Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club], Theodore Ts'o, 09:43
- Re: Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club], John Leslie, 08:58
- Re: conclusion on draft-farrell-perpass, Tim Bray, 07:50
- Re: conclusion on draft-farrell-perpass, Randy Bush, 07:22
- Re: conclusion on draft-farrell-perpass, Stephen Farrell, 06:50
- RE: Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club], l.wood, 06:25
- conclusion on draft-farrell-perpass, IETF Chair, 05:53
- Re: Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club], Mary Barnes, 05:47
- RE: Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club], Adrian Farrel, 05:47
- Re: Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club], S Moonesamy, 04:56
- Re: A private club, Jari Arkko, 04:17
- Re: Social activities under societies (was Re: anti-harassment procedures, Abdussalam Baryun, 03:13
- Re: Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club], Donald Eastlake, 03:09
- Re: Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club], Dave Cridland, 02:46
- RE: Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club], l.wood, 02:46
- Re: Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club], Abdussalam Baryun, 02:24
February 26, 2014
- Re: Consequences of Snowdonia, Jari Arkko, 21:03
- Re: Consequences of Snowdonia, Christopher Morrow, 20:16
- Re: A private club, Barry Leiba, 20:03
- Re: A private club, S Moonesamy, 18:46
- Re: A private club, S Moonesamy, 18:46
- Re: A private club, Brian E Carpenter, 16:58
- Re: A private club, Melinda Shore, 16:51
- Re: A private club, S Moonesamy, 16:35
- squeaky dolphin (was Re: Ad hominems), Lucy Lynch, 14:47
- Re: A private club, Brian E Carpenter, 13:42
- Re: A private club, Mikael Abrahamsson, 13:36
- Re: A private club, Tim Chown, 13:19
- Re: A private club, Brian E Carpenter, 13:06
- Re: A private club, joel jaeggli, 11:30
- Re: A private club, S Moonesamy, 11:15
- Re: Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club], S Moonesamy, 11:14
- Re: [89attendees] [89all] Welcome to IETF-89, Nabil Benamar, 10:13
- RE: [89attendees] [89all] Welcome to IETF-89, abdelmoniem.rezk, 10:12
- Re: [89all] Welcome to IETF-89, Nabil Benamar, 10:11
- Re: [89all] Welcome to IETF-89, Nabil Benamar, 10:11
- Consequences of Snowdonia, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 09:18
- Re: A private club, Randy Bush, 08:55
- Re: Knowledge and suggestions (was: Re: Ad hominems), John C Klensin, 08:53
- Re: Knowledge and suggestions (was: Re: Ad hominems), Randy Bush, 08:40
- Re: Knowledge and suggestions (was: Re: Ad hominems), Thomas Narten, 08:24
- Re: A private club, John C Klensin, 07:59
- Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club], Adrian Farrel, 07:57
- Re: A private club, S Moonesamy, 07:32
- Knowledge and suggestions (was: Re: Ad hominems), John C Klensin, 07:17
- Re: Ad hominems, Izaac, 05:51
- Re: Ad hominems, David Conrad, 05:13
- Re: A private club, S Moonesamy, 04:11
- Re: Ad hominems, Dave Cridland, 04:07
February 25, 2014
- Re: Ad hominems, Randy Bush, 20:35
- RE: Ad hominems, John E Drake, 20:33
- RE: Ad hominems, l.wood, 20:23
- RE: Ad hominems, John E Drake, 19:47
- Re: Ad hominems, Abdussalam Baryun, 19:44
- Re: Call for Review of draft-iab-filtering-considerations-06.txt, "Technical Considerations for Internet Service Blocking and Filtering", Brian E Carpenter, 19:28
- Re: A private club, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 18:50
- RE: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions, Pat Thaler, 18:42
- Re: Ad hominems (was: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions), Andrew Sullivan, 18:32
- RE: Ad hominems (was: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions), John E Drake, 17:52
- Re: Ad hominems (was: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions), Dave Crocker, 17:38
- Re: Ad hominems, John C Klensin, 17:36
- Re: A private club, Melinda Shore, 17:32
- A private club (was: Ad hominems), S Moonesamy, 17:22
- RE: Ad hominems (was: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions), John E Drake, 16:38
- Re: Ad hominems (was: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions), Dave Crocker, 15:59
- Re: Ad hominems, Dave Crocker, 15:48
- RE: Ad hominems, John E Drake, 15:40
- Re: Ad hominems, Michael StJohns, 15:23
- RE: Ad hominems, l.wood, 14:35
- RE: Ad hominems, l.wood, 14:23
- Re: Ad hominems, Stewart Bryant, 14:12
- Re: Ad hominems (was: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions), Barry Leiba, 14:06
- Re: Ad hominems (was: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions), John C Klensin, 13:53
- Re: Ad hominems, Melinda Shore, 13:41
- Re: Ad hominems, Dave Crocker, 13:40
- Re: Ad hominems, ned+ietf, 13:32
- Re: Ad hominems, Stewart Bryant, 13:24
- Re: Ad hominems, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 13:22
- Re: Ad hominems (was: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions), Scott Brim, 13:05
- Re: Ad hominems, Barry Leiba, 12:48
- Re: Ad hominems, Ted Lemon, 12:16
- Re: Ad hominems, Noel Chiappa, 11:58
- Re: Ad hominems (was: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions), ned+ietf, 11:00
- Re: Ad hominems (was: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions), Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:30
- Re: Ad hominems (was: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions), Stephen Kent, 10:07
- Re: IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures, S Moonesamy, 06:30
- Welcome to IETF-89, IETF Chair, 05:34
- Re: Ad hominems (was: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions), Abdussalam Baryun, 04:35
- Re: Ad hominems (was: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions), t.p., 04:05
- Re: IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures, Andrea Glorioso, 02:57
- Re: calls for discussion, Abdussalam Baryun, 02:30
- Re: Ad hominems, George Michaelson, 02:14
- Re: Ad hominems, Eggert, Lars, 02:11
- Re: calls for discussion, Barry Leiba, 01:36
February 24, 2014
- RE: Ad hominems, l.wood, 23:51
- Re: Ad hominems, Dave Crocker, 23:40
- RE: Ad hominems (was: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions), l.wood, 23:32
- Re: Ad hominems (was: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions), S Moonesamy, 16:57
- Re: Ad hominems (was: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions), Fred Baker (fred), 16:43
- Re: [89attendees] The SmartAmerica Challenge [update] and Presidential Innovation Fellows - Round 3, Geoff Mulligan, 16:21
- Re: Ad hominems (was: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions), Dave Crocker, 15:40
- Re: Ad hominems (was: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions), Noel Chiappa, 15:30
- Re: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions, Abdussalam Baryun, 14:43
- Re: Ad hominems (was: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions), Phillip Hallam-Baker, 14:41
- Ad hominems (was: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions), Andrew Sullivan, 14:15
- Re: anti-harassment procedures, Brian E Carpenter, 13:43
- Re: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 13:37
- RE: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions, James Polk, 12:48
- Re: anti-harassment procedures, S Moonesamy, 12:43
- Re: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions, Loa Andersson, 12:03
- Re: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions, Melinda Shore, 11:21
- Re: Reminder: Call for nominations: IETF appointment to the ISOC Board of Trustees, Hago Dafalla, 10:57
- Re: [89all] Invitation to Participate in Mentoring Program, Palanivelan Appanasamy, 10:56
- Re: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions, Dave Crocker, 10:54
- Re: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions, Loa Andersson, 10:50
- Re: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions, Dave Crocker, 10:40
- WG name on I-D front matter (1id-guidelines.txt), Bjoern Hoehrmann, 10:08
- Re: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions, Thomas Clausen, 09:41
- Re: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 09:02
- Re: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions, John C Klensin, 08:40
- RE: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions, Adrian Farrel, 08:39
- Re: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions, Mary Barnes, 08:37
- Re: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions, Dave Crocker, 08:15
- Re: anti-harassment procedures, Vesna Manojlovic, 07:38
- RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-special-purpose-labels-05, Roni Even, 07:37
- RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-special-purpose-labels-05, Adrian Farrel, 05:55
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-special-purpose-labels-05, Roni Even, 05:42
- ITAT workshop blog, Eliot Lear, 04:36
- RE: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions, l.wood, 00:51
February 23, 2014
- Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions, Abdussalam Baryun, 21:43
- Re: Basic Issues (was Re: anti-harassment procedures), S Moonesamy, 12:43
- Re: Basic Issues (was Re: anti-harassment procedures), Stephen Farrell, 11:26
- Re: Basic Issues (was Re: anti-harassment procedures), Yoav Nir, 08:48
- Re: Basic Issues (was Re: anti-harassment procedures), Scott Brim, 08:34
- Re: Basic Issues (was Re: anti-harassment procedures), Dave Crocker, 08:22
- Re: Basic Issues (was Re: anti-harassment procedures), Ted Lemon, 07:50
- Re: Basic Issues (was Re: anti-harassment procedures), Patrik Fältström, 07:42
- Re: Basic Issues (was Re: anti-harassment procedures), Ted Lemon, 07:35
- Re: IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures, Abdussalam Baryun, 07:28
- RE: Basic Issues (was Re: anti-harassment procedures), l.wood, 04:25
- Re: Basic Issues (was Re: anti-harassment procedures), Patrik Fältström, 03:48
- Re: IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures, S Moonesamy, 03:23
- Re: Basic Issues (was Re: anti-harassment procedures), Abdussalam Baryun, 01:16
February 22, 2014
- Re: Basic Issues (was Re: anti-harassment procedures), Brian E Carpenter, 21:56
- Re: Basic Issues (was Re: anti-harassment procedures), John Leslie, 18:52
- Basic Issues (was Re: anti-harassment procedures), Dave Crocker, 16:14
- IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures, Abdussalam Baryun, 15:31
- Re: anti-harassment procedures, Timothy B. Terriberry, 15:22
- Re: IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures, S Moonesamy, 13:05
- Re: IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures, Andrea Glorioso, 08:50
- Social activities under societies (was Re: anti-harassment procedures, Abdussalam Baryun, 02:48
February 21, 2014
- Re: anti-harassment procedures, Brian E Carpenter, 22:40
- Re: anti-harassment procedures, John Levine, 22:04
- Re: anti-harassment procedures, Keith Moore, 20:41
- Re: anti-harassment procedures, Timothy B. Terriberry, 19:20
- IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures, S Moonesamy, 19:02
- Re: draft naming was RE: anti-harassment procedures, Keith Moore, 15:58
- Re: draft naming was RE: anti-harassment procedures, Dave Cridland, 15:51
- Re: draft naming was RE: anti-harassment procedures, Keith Moore, 15:26
- Re: draft naming was RE: anti-harassment procedures, John C Klensin, 12:02
- Re: anti-harassment procedures, Alessandro Vesely, 10:37
- Re: Eating the dog food, Eliot Lear, 09:06
- Eating the dog food, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 08:57
- Re: draft naming was RE: anti-harassment procedures, Loa Andersson, 04:25
- Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, S Moonesamy, 03:33
- Re: draft naming was RE: anti-harassment procedures, Brian Trammell, 02:00
February 20, 2014
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: draft naming was RE: anti-harassment procedures, Brian E Carpenter, 18:04
- Re: anti-harassment procedures, Abdussalam Baryun, 17:52
- Re: draft naming was RE: anti-harassment procedures, John C Klensin, 17:18
- RE: draft naming was RE: anti-harassment procedures, Adrian Farrel, 15:31
- draft naming was RE: anti-harassment procedures, l.wood, 15:22
- Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 15:08
- anti-harassment procedures, Jari Arkko, 14:57
- Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, S Moonesamy, 13:40
- Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, Barry Leiba, 12:27
- Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, Sam Hartman, 10:01
- Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 09:40
- Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 08:46
- Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, Ralph Droms, 08:12
- Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, Eliot Lear, 01:23
- Apple cable swap.., George Michaelson, 01:05
February 19, 2014
- Invitation to Participate in Mentoring Program, IETF Chair, 23:55
- Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, S Moonesamy, 22:35
- Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, Mark Nottingham, 19:28
- Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, Dave Crocker, 19:00
- RE: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, l.wood, 18:52
- Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, Tim Bray, 18:48
- Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 18:38
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-pcp-description-option-03, Jari Arkko, 16:10
- Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, S Moonesamy, 15:57
- Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, Barry Leiba, 15:11
- Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, Barry Leiba, 14:10
- Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, John C Klensin, 13:52
- Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, Barry Leiba, 12:56
- Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, Joe Hildebrand, 12:17
- Reminder: Call for nominations: IETF appointment to the ISOC Board of Trustees, IAB Chair, 10:40
- Broken email timestamp causes email to be classed as spam (was: Re: broken tools.ietf.org configuration results in 5xx permentant failure?), Henrik Levkowetz, 06:18
February 18, 2014
- Re: Proposed Changes to IAOC Communications Plan; Request for Community Input, Jorge Contreras, 20:50
- Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 18:47
- Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, Barry Leiba, 16:50
- IETF-LAC Announce: Workshop Pre-IETF in America Latina, Juliao Braga, 15:22
- Re: Internet organisations coordination meeting, S Moonesamy, 14:36
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-multimob-pmipv6-source-07, Thomas C. Schmidt, 10:28
- broken tools.ietf.org configuration results in 5xx permentant failure?, Paul Wouters, 10:28
- Re: Internet organisations coordination meeting, John Curran, 10:27
- Re: Internet organisations coordination meeting, Ted Lemon, 09:33
- Re: Gen-art last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-08.txt, Benoit Claise, 05:09
- Re: Gen-art last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-08.txt, Benoit Claise, 04:59
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-housley-pkix-oids-00, Roni Even, 03:15
February 17, 2014
- Re: Internet organisations coordination meeting, Medel v6 Ramirez, 18:37
- Re: Internet organisations coordination meeting, Donald Eastlake, 17:11
- Re: Internet organisations coordination meeting, Dale R. Worley, 16:46
- Last Call: <draft-mahalingam-dutt-dcops-vxlan-08.txt>: 4 comments, Black, David, 11:18
- Re: Internet organisations coordination meeting, Ted Lemon, 10:42
- RE: Internet organisations coordination meeting, l.wood, 01:55
February 16, 2014
- RE: Internet organisations coordination meeting, Christian Huitema, 21:56
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-multimob-pmipv6-source-07, Black, David, 21:23
- Re: Internet organisations coordination meeting, Jorge Amodio, 18:14
- Re: Internet organisations coordination meeting, Jorge Amodio, 18:09
- Re: Internet organisations coordination meeting, John C Klensin, 17:32
- Re: Internet organisations coordination meeting, John Curran, 17:27
- Re: Internet organisations coordination meeting, Joel M. Halpern, 17:12
- Re: Internet organisations coordination meeting, Jorge Amodio, 16:39
- Re: Internet organisations coordination meeting, Brian E Carpenter, 15:44
- Re: Internet organisations coordination meeting, Jari Arkko, 15:40
- Re: Internet organisations coordination meeting, avri, 15:09
- Re: Internet organisations coordination meeting, John Curran, 14:38
- Re: Internet organisations coordination meeting, Jorge Amodio, 09:59
- Re: Internet organisations coordination meeting, Yoav Nir, 09:58
- Re: Internet organisations coordination meeting, John C Klensin, 09:27
- Re: Internet organisations coordination meeting, John C Klensin, 09:26
- Re: Internet organisations coordination meeting, Noel Chiappa, 08:49
- Re: Internet organisations coordination meeting, Ted Lemon, 06:21
- Re: Internet organisations coordination meeting, Loa Andersson, 03:37
- RE: Internet organisations coordination meeting, l.wood, 02:16
- Internet organisations coordination meeting, Abdussalam Baryun, 01:32
February 15, 2014
- Re: Internet organisations coordination meeting, Avri Doria, 18:39
- Re: Internet organisations coordination meeting, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 17:41
- Re: Internet organisations coordination meeting, Brian E Carpenter, 16:48
- Re: Internet organisations coordination meeting, John C Klensin, 15:20
- Re: Internet organisations coordination meeting, Jorge Amodio, 14:49
- Re: Internet organisations coordination meeting, Brian E Carpenter, 14:20
- Internet organisations coordination meeting, IETF Chair, 04:23
February 14, 2014
- Update on IAOC appointment by the IESG, IETF Chair, 16:01
- RE: Last Call: <draft-yourtchenko-cisco-ies-09.txt> (Cisco Specific Information Elements reused in IPFIX) to Informational RFC, Andrew Feren, 12:32
- RE: Last Call: <draft-yourtchenko-cisco-ies-09.txt> (Cisco Specific Information Elements reused in IPFIX) to Informational RFC, Andrew Feren, 12:10
- RE: Last Call: <draft-yourtchenko-cisco-ies-09.txt> (Cisco Specific Information Elements reused in IPFIX) to Informational RFC, Andrew Yourtchenko, 12:05
- Re: Last Call: <draft-yourtchenko-cisco-ies-09.txt> (Cisco Specific Information Elements reused in IPFIX) to Informational RFC, Abdussalam Baryun, 11:13
- RE: Last Call: <draft-yourtchenko-cisco-ies-09.txt> (Cisco Specific Information Elements reused in IPFIX) to Informational RFC, Adrian Farrel, 06:28
February 13, 2014
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: NOMCOM - IAB Slate, Dave Crocker, 17:11
- NOMCOM - IAB Slate, NomCom Chair 2013, 16:57
- Re: Last Call: <draft-yourtchenko-cisco-ies-09.txt> (Cisco Specific Information Elements reused in IPFIX) to Informational RFC, joel jaeggli, 13:36
- Re: calls for discussion, Brian E Carpenter, 12:41
- Re: calls for discussion, Abdussalam Baryun, 06:08
- Re: calls for discussion, t.p., 03:12
February 12, 2014
- Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-policy-qualifiers-01.txt> (Policy Qualifiers in RPKI Certificates) to Proposed Standard, Randy Bush, 19:08
- Re: calls for discussion, Randy Bush, 18:23
- Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-policy-qualifiers-01.txt> (Policy Qualifiers in RPKI Certificates) to Proposed Standard, George Michaelson, 17:10
- Re: calls for discussion, George Michaelson, 17:05
- RE: calls for discussion, l.wood, 16:18
- Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-policy-qualifiers-01.txt> (Policy Qualifiers in RPKI Certificates) to Proposed Standard, Rob Austein, 15:06
- Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-policy-qualifiers-01.txt> (Policy Qualifiers in RPKI Certificates) to Proposed Standard, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 13:53
- Re: calls for discussion, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 12:49
- Re: calls for discussion, S Moonesamy, 11:37
- Re: calls for discussion, Melinda Shore, 10:22
- Re: calls for discussion, Ted Lemon, 10:06
- Re: Does silence have no value? suggested for draft-resnick-on-consensus-06, Loa Andersson, 10:05
- Re: calls for discussion, Margaret Wasserman, 10:03
- Re: calls for discussion, Dave Crocker, 09:24
- Re: Does silence have no value? suggested for draft-resnick-on-consensus-06, Scott Brim, 09:10
- Re: Does silence have no value? suggested for draft-resnick-on-consensus-06, Dave Cridland, 08:52
- Re: calls for discussion, Loa Andersson, 07:09
- RE: calls for discussion, l.wood, 06:12
- RE: calls for discussion, l.wood, 05:29
- Does silence have no value? suggested for draft-resnick-on-consensus-06, Abdussalam Baryun, 04:32
- Re: calls for discussion, Abdussalam Baryun, 04:16
- calls for discussion, Chris Elliott, 02:46
- Re: calls for discussion, Dave Cridland, 02:02
- Re: calls for discussion, Randy Bush, 01:37
- Re: calls for discussion, Melinda Shore, 00:49
- calls for discussion, Randy Bush, 00:45
February 11, 2014
- Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-policy-qualifiers-01.txt> (Policy Qualifiers in RPKI Certificates) to Proposed Standard, Randy Bush, 17:10
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-policy-qualifiers-01.txt> (Policy Qualifiers in RPKI Certificates) to Proposed Standard, Russ Housley, 15:11
- Re: [Roll] Last Call: <draft-ietf-roll-trickle-mcast-06.txt> (Multicast Protocol for Low power and Lossy Networks (MPL)) to Proposed Standard, Kerry Lynn, 10:03
- Re: Revision to Note Well, Jari Arkko, 09:41
- Re: [Roll] Last Call: <draft-ietf-roll-trickle-mcast-06.txt> (Multicast Protocol for Low power and Lossy Networks (MPL)) to Proposed Standard, Ines Robles, 07:25
- Re: [Roll] Last Call: <draft-ietf-roll-trickle-mcast-06.txt> (Multicast Protocol for Low power and Lossy Networks (MPL)) to Proposed Standard, Ines Robles, 07:01
February 10, 2014
- Re: Invalid TLS certificates on example.[org,net,com], John Levine, 22:41
- Re: Invalid TLS certificates on example.[org,net,com], Phillip Hallam-Baker, 18:13
- Invalid TLS certificates on example.[org,net,com], Mark Nottingham, 17:13
- Ericsson to Host IETF 90 in Toronto!, IETF Administrative Director, 16:47
- Re: you can lead a horse to water, was Revision to Note Well, Dave Crocker, 10:50
- Re: you can lead a horse to water, was Revision to Note Well, John Levine, 10:27
- Re: WG Action: Rechartered Transport Layer Security (tls), Farooq247, 09:23
- Re: Revision to Note Well, Jorge Contreras, 08:26
February 09, 2014
- Please remove my account from ietf, Kun Yang, 21:53
- RE: Code Sprint in London, l.wood, 18:11
- Code Sprint in London, IETF Chair, 04:01
- IAOC appointment by the IESG, IETF Chair, 03:59
- Code Sprint in London, Jari Arkko, 03:36
February 08, 2014
- Re: Revision to Note Well, Sandy Wills, 16:06
- Re: Revision to Note Well, Paul Hoffman, 16:03
- RE: Revision to Note Well, Christer Holmberg, 13:58
- Re: Revision to Note Well, Richard Barnes, 12:48
- Re: Revision to Note Well (some history) - updated, Dave Crocker, 09:22
- Fwd: IETF Returning to Berlin for IETF 96, Ray Pelletier, 05:04
- Fwd: IPR Tool SOW for Community Input, Ray Pelletier, 05:03
- Re: Revision to Note Well (some history) - updated, John C Klensin, 00:49
February 07, 2014
- Re: Revision to Note Well (some history) - updated, Jorge Contreras, 22:35
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-number-registries-02.txt> (Internet Numbers Registries) to Informational RFC, David Farmer, 21:58
- RE: Revision to Note Well, Christer Holmberg, 17:42
- Re: Revision to Note Well, Dave Crocker, 17:33
- IETF 89 Final Agenda, IETF Agenda, 16:59
- Re: Revision to Note Well, Eggert, Lars, 15:06
- Re: Revision to Note Well (some history) - updated, Scott O. Bradner, 13:46
- Re: Revision to Note Well (some history), Scott O. Bradner, 13:44
- Re: Revision to Note Well, Spencer Dawkins, 13:26
- Re: Revision to Note Well, John C Klensin, 13:23
- Re: Revision to Note Well, Brian E Carpenter, 13:21
- Re: Revision to Note Well, Scott Brim, 12:39
- Re: Revision to Note Well, John C Klensin, 12:10
- Re: Revision to Note Well, S Moonesamy, 11:56
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-64share-09.txt> (Extending an IPv6 /64 Prefix from a 3GPP Mobile Interface to a LAN link) to Informational RFC, Alexandru Petrescu, 11:43
- Re: Revision to Note Well, Pete Resnick, 11:29
- Re: Revision to Note Well, Scott O. Bradner, 11:17
- Re: Revision to Note Well, Scott Brim, 11:13
- Re: Revision to Note Well, Paul Wouters, 11:10
- Re: Improving IESG & IAB engagement when IETF comments are solicited, John C Klensin, 10:55
- Improving IESG & IAB engagement when IETF comments are solicited, Dave Crocker, 10:22
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-number-registries-02.txt> (Internet Numbers Registries) to Informational RFC, Russ Housley, 09:53
- Re: Revision to Note Well, Dave Crocker, 09:17
- Re: Revision to Note Well, Eggert, Lars, 02:15
February 06, 2014
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:54
- Re: [89attendees] IETF 89 London - Tube strikes and Oyster cards, Geoff Mulligan, 20:07
- Re: Revision to Note Well, Scott Brim, 19:38
- Re: Revision to Note Well, George Michaelson, 19:20
- Re: Revision to Note Well, Warren Kumari, 19:11
- Re: Revision to Note Well, ned+ietf, 16:05
- Re: Revision to Note Well, GTW, 15:44
- Re: Revision to Note Well, Andrew Sullivan, 15:07
- Re: Revision to Note Well, Paul Hoffman, 15:04
- Re: Revision to Note Well, Pete Resnick, 14:53
- Re: Revision to Note Well, Mary Barnes, 14:28
- Re: Revision to Note Well, Bjoern Hoehrmann, 14:18
- Re: Revision to Note Well, Dave Crocker, 14:10
- Re: Revision to Note Well, Salvatore Loreto, 13:57
- Re: Revision to Note Well, ned+ietf, 13:48
- Re: Revision to Note Well, Brian E Carpenter, 13:35
- RE: Revision to Note Well, Christer Holmberg, 13:30
- Re: Revision to Note Well, ned+ietf, 13:29
- Re: Revision to Note Well, Cullen Jennings (fluffy), 13:18
- Revision to Note Well, Richard Barnes, 13:12
- Re: Proposed Changes to IAOC Communications Plan; Request for Community Input, Chris Elliott, 11:32
- RE: IETF 89 London - Tube from LHR (was Tube strikes and Oyster cards), Dearlove, Christopher (UK), 07:42
- discussion of governance principles, Eliot Lear, 06:38
- RE: [89attendees] IETF 89 London - Tube strikes and Oyster cards, Christer Holmberg, 04:42
- Re: [89attendees] IETF 89 London - Tube strikes and Oyster cards, t.p., 04:38
- Handling the situation with two Juniper routing ADs, Adrian Farrel, 02:32
- Re: Proposed Changes to IAOC Communications Plan; Request for Community Input, David Morris, 00:50
February 05, 2014
- Re: Proposed Changes to IAOC Communications Plan; Request for Community Input, Patrik Fältström, 23:55
- Re: [89attendees] Mobile phone service in London, Tim Bray, 23:54
- Re: Proposed Changes to IAOC Communications Plan; Request for Community Input, Randy Bush, 23:45
- Re: Proposed Changes to IAOC Communications Plan; Request for Community Input, David Morris, 22:49
- Re: Proposed Changes to IAOC Communications Plan; Request for Community Input, Randy Bush, 21:57
- Re: Proposed Changes to IAOC Communications Plan; Request for Community Input, Brian E Carpenter, 21:54
- Re: Proposed Changes to IAOC Communications Plan; Request for Community Input, Andrew Sullivan, 21:47
- Re: Proposed Changes to IAOC Communications Plan; Request for Community Input, Randy Bush, 21:45
- Re: Proposed Changes to IAOC Communications Plan; Request for Community Input, David Morris, 21:37
- Please use 89attendees(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org [was Re: IETF 89 London - Tube strikes and Oyster cards], Bob Hinden, 19:35
- Proposed Changes to IAOC Communications Plan; Request for Community Input, IETF Administrative Director, 18:48
- Re: [89attendees] Mobile phone service in London, Paul Hoffman, 17:18
- Re: IETF 89 London - Tube from LHR (was Tube strikes and Oyster cards), Mark Nottingham, 17:09
- Re: [89attendees] IETF 89 London - Tube strikes and Oyster cards, John R Levine, 17:04
- Re: IETF 89 London - Tube from LHR (was Tube strikes and Oyster cards), Steven Bellovin, 16:49
- Re: [89attendees] IETF 89 London - Tube strikes and Oyster cards, Mary Barnes, 16:44
- Re: [89attendees] IETF 89 London - Tube strikes and Oyster cards, Mary Barnes, 16:40
- Re: IETF 89 London - Tube from LHR (was Tube strikes and Oyster cards), Mary Barnes, 16:39
- Re: [89attendees] Mobile phone service in London, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 16:14
- Re: IETF 89 London - Tube from LHR (was Tube strikes and Oyster cards), Phillip Hallam-Baker, 16:00
- Re: [89attendees] Mobile phone service in London, John Levine, 15:57
- Re: [89attendees] IETF 89 London - Tube strikes and Oyster cards, John Levine, 15:49
- Re: [89attendees] Mobile phone service in London, John Levine, 15:38
- Re: IETF 89 London - Tube from LHR (was Tube strikes and Oyster cards), Warren Kumari, 15:31
- RE: IETF 89 London - Tube from LHR (was Tube strikes and Oyster cards), Michael StJohns, 15:15
- Re: [89attendees] IETF 89 London - Tube strikes and Oyster cards, David Misell, 15:13
- Re: IETF 89 London - Tube from LHR (was Tube strikes and Oyster cards), Rifaat Shekh-Yusef, 15:13
- RE: IETF 89 London - Tube from LHR (was Tube strikes and Oyster cards), Tim Bray, 15:05
- RE: IETF 89 London - Tube from LHR (was Tube strikes and Oyster cards), Ross Callon, 15:01
- Re: IETF 89 London - Tube from LHR (was Tube strikes and Oyster cards), Ted Lemon, 14:46
- NOMCOM - IESG Appointments, NomCom Chair 2013, 13:05
- Re: IETF 89 London - Tube strikes and Oyster cards, Mary Barnes, 10:04
- Re: IETF 89 London - Tube strikes and Oyster cards, Dave Crocker, 09:44
- Re: IETF 89 London - Tube from LHR (was Tube strikes and Oyster cards), Mary Barnes, 09:14
- Re: IETF 89 London - Tube from LHR (was Tube strikes and Oyster cards), Ralph Droms, 09:13
- Re: IETF 89 London - Tube from LHR (was Tube strikes and Oyster cards), Scott Brim, 09:10
- Re: IETF 89 London - Tube strikes and Oyster cards, Andrew G. Malis, 09:00
- Re: IETF 89 London - Tube strikes and Oyster cards, Ted Lemon, 08:46
- Re: IETF 89 London - Tube strikes and Oyster cards, Avri Doria, 08:41
- Re: IETF 89 London - Tube strikes and Oyster cards, Avri Doria, 08:39
- Re: IETF 89 London - Tube strikes and Oyster cards, Mary Barnes, 08:21
- Re: IETF 89 London - Tube strikes and Oyster cards, Ted Lemon, 07:59
- Re: IETF 89 London - Tube strikes and Oyster cards, Elwyn Davies, 07:51
- Re: IETF 89 London - Tube strikes, Tim Chown, 06:47
- Re: IETF 89 London - Enquiry, Alexandru Petrescu, 06:31
- Re: IETF 89 London - Enquiry, Tim Chown, 04:48
February 03, 2014
- NOMCOM - IAOC Appointment, NomCom Chair 2013, 19:58
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-number-registries-02.txt> (Internet Numbers Registries) to Informational RFC, David Farmer, 19:51
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Joseph Lorenzo Hall, 19:22
- Re: Email header randon(?) changes, Robert Sparks, 17:11
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 16:22
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Ted Lemon, 15:59
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 15:44
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-number-registries-02.txt> (Internet Numbers Registries) to Informational RFC, Russ Housley, 14:21
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Theodore Ts'o, 13:56
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, John C Klensin, 13:52
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Ted Lemon, 13:47
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Brian E Carpenter, 13:46
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 13:37
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Brian E Carpenter, 13:18
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Dale R. Worley, 13:16
- Re: Email header randon(?) changes, Brian E Carpenter, 13:13
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Dale R. Worley, 13:12
- Re: Email header randon(?) changes, John Levine, 11:57
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Dave Crocker, 10:34
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dmm-requirements-13.txt> (Requirements for Distributed Mobility Management) to Informational RFC, Abdussalam Baryun, 09:44
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 09:41
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 09:31
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Stephen Kent, 09:28
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, John C Klensin, 09:13
- Re: Email header randon(?) changes, Glen, 08:47
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 08:32
- Email header randon(?) changes, t.p., 08:10
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, t.p., 08:10
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Theodore Ts'o, 08:08
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Bjoern Hoehrmann, 08:02
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, John C Klensin, 03:44
- Re: [alto] Last Call: <draft-ietf-alto-protocol-25.txt> (ALTO Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Enrico Marocco, 02:21
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-alto-protocol-25.txt> (ALTO Protocol) to Proposed Standard, joel jaeggli, 01:29
February 02, 2014
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Patrik Fältström, 19:19
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Pete Resnick, 18:45
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Tobias Gondrom, 18:29
- RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp-04.txt> (Encapsulating MPLS in UDP) to Proposed Standard, Greg Daley, 17:33
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Theodore Ts'o, 15:47
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, John Levine, 14:38
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:26
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Ted Lemon, 10:04
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Scott Brim, 09:55
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 09:35
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Joseph Lorenzo Hall, 07:55
- Re: Make it a Proposed Method rather than Proposed Standard [Re: When is an idea a good idea?], Abdussalam Baryun, 04:28
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Dave Crocker, 03:17
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Patrik Fältström, 03:00
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Dave Crocker, 02:55
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Patrik Fältström, 02:49
February 01, 2014
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, John C Klensin, 23:19
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Dave Crocker, 21:22
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Stephen Farrell, 20:45
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Dave Crocker, 20:39
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Stephen Farrell, 20:28
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Randy Bush, 19:03
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, John C Klensin, 18:36
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Dave Crocker, 17:35
- Agenda, security, and monitoring, John C Klensin, 17:18
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-pcp-description-option-03, Ted Lemon, 15:08
- Re: Make it a Proposed Method rather than Proposed Standard [Re: When is an idea a good idea?], John C Klensin, 13:23
- Re: Make it a Proposed Method rather than Proposed Standard [Re: When is an idea a good idea?], Hector Santos, 11:41