Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists

On 8 Apr 2014, at 06:16, Robin H. Johnson <robbat2(_at_)gentoo(_dot_)org> wrote:

And don't start on suggesting Reply-To instead, RFC 2822 already
noted that it should be set by the author, not the list software [1].


Not that I disagree, but be sure to read the note in RFC 5598 s5.3.

Cheers,
Sabahattin

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Robin H. Johnson Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, John R Levine Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Sabahattin Gucukoglu Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Scott Kitterman Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Brian E Carpenter Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Robin H. Johnson Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Sabahattin Gucukoglu <= Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Dave Crocker Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Hector Santos Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Doug Barton Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, John Levine Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Doug Barton Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, John Levine Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Miles Fidelman Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Murray S. Kucherawy Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Miles Fidelman Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, S Moonesamy