Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportuni

Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC

2014-07-08 18:16:30

i have read this draft and followed the discussion on saag.  i think it
is needed and worthwhile contribution.  while i am especially fond of
encrypt by default, it is important that inability to authenticate must
not lead to cleartext when unauthenticated encryption is possible.

randy

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, S Moonesamy Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Randy Bush <= Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Viktor Dukhovni Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Tim Bray Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Eliot Lear Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Stephen Farrell SMTP authentication (not soon), Viktor Dukhovni Re: SMTP authentication (not soon), Niels Dettenbach Re: SMTP authentication (not soon), Phillip Hallam-Baker Re: SMTP authentication (not soon), Viktor Dukhovni Re: SMTP authentication (not soon), Stephen Farrell Re: SMTP authentication (not soon), ned+ietf