ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic]

2014-09-12 17:20:38
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Nico Williams 
<nico(_at_)cryptonector(_dot_)com>
wrote:

On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 03:35:19PM +0000, MH Michael Hammer (5304) wrote:
The big change with DMARC is a deprecation of the Sender/From
differentiation, effectively requiring that these two will be the
same. It
seems that big systems have voted that the differentiation causes more
harm (spam, phish) than good (remailers).


That's curious.  Maybe I'm not understanding, but:

DMARC doesn't check Sender, so I don't see how this is relevant.  Or do you
mean that what one would now put in Sender is required to be in From?

The cases in which only the LHS differs are rather uninteresting though;
Christian H. is quite right.  We've taken a step backwards.


Maybe in some ways that's true.  On the other hand, if almost nothing ever
checked Sender to begin with, and a lot of things that "should" have
generated it didn't, what practical difference does it make?

-MSK