On 16/09/2014 09:46, Dave Crocker wrote:
On 9/15/2014 2:45 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
The worst case, which is not a fantasy, is that 5 large companies encourage
their staff to volunteer, so we end up with 5 pairs of large-company
staff and nobody from the rest of the community. But (as Mike seems to
imply) if we put in rules to make this impossible, we'd be even further
from "each eligible volunteer is equally likely to be selected."
So this does need clarity of intent, one way or the other.
Make it max 1 per company.
So how would you modify the assertion in quotes, which is
already untrue with the 2 per company rule?
Real and substantial diversity is essential.
Agreed. That wasn't my point, though.
Brian
If we cannot get an adequate nomcom on that basis, we've got bigger
problems and nomcom selection isn't the place to try to solve it.
d/