From: Edward Lewis
<edward(_dot_)lewis(_at_)icann(_dot_)org<mailto:edward(_dot_)lewis(_at_)icann(_dot_)org>>
Date: Friday, October 17, 2014 at 1:41 PM
To: "ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org<mailto:ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>"
<ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org<mailto:ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>>,
"iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org<mailto:iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>"
<iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org<mailto:iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>>
Cc: "weirds(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org<mailto:weirds(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>"
<weirds(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org<mailto:weirds(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>>, Andrew Newton
<andy(_at_)arin(_dot_)net<mailto:andy(_at_)arin(_dot_)net>>, Scott Hollenbeck
<shollenbeck(_at_)verisign(_dot_)com<mailto:shollenbeck(_at_)verisign(_dot_)com>>
Subject: Re: [weirds] Last Call: <draft-ietf-weirds-json-response-10.txt> (JSON
Responses for the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP)) to Proposed Standard
Just two nits:
Comment 1
In section 5.2 the term/phrase “first-class” as in "name server model” is used
twice but never defined.
I don’t have a suggested fix.
It’s a generic term of art. Do we really want to be defining it in RFCs?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-class_citizen
Comment 2
While looking for something else, I noted one use of “secure DNSSEC” in section
14, probably meant “secure DNS” there.
Yup. Will fix.
-andy