That's an ad-hominem argument that has no bearing on the current proposal.
Though, if I was paying better attention, I'd have complained about those moves
being unnecessary too.
L.
I still regret not objecting to BEEP going standards-track. Who uses it?
On 4 Dec 2014, at 14:06, Ted Lemon wrote:
On Dec 3, 2014, at 12:04 PM, Bob Hinden
<bob(_dot_)hinden(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
We have effectively gotten to the point of depletion of IPV4 addresses, and
the world has not come to an end. I don't see any need to reclassify this
RFC as a standard and think doing so would cause confusion in the community
and be harmful to the Internet.
If you think this shouldn't be a standard, why didn't you object when MAP-E,
MAP-T and Lightweight 4over6 were last-called?