As a member of or sympathizer with various societies for bear
encouragement and preservation (black, brown, polar, Cub Scouts,
Teddy, Pooh, ... in no particular order), I find this name
really objectionable. From the description, "unbearerable"
might have been better, "betterbearer" certainly would have been.
"unbearable" should be reserved for April 1 RFCs and similar
work efforts :-)
I wonder if anyone has ever appealed a mailing list name.
unbearably yours,
john
--On Friday, December 05, 2014 11:18 -0800 IETF Secretariat
<ietf-secretariat(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org> wrote:
A new IETF non-working group email list has been created.
List address: unbearable(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/unbearable/
To subscribe: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/unbearable
Purpose:
This list is for discussion of proposals for doing better than
bearer tokens (e.g. HTTP cookies, OAuth tokens etc.) for web
applications. The specific goal is chartering a WG focused on
preventing security token export and replay attacks.