Looks good. Thanks for addressing my concerns.
Regards,
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: Gen-art [mailto:gen-art-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of
MORTON,
ALFRED C (AL)
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2015 1:33 AM
To: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Cc: gen-art(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; ops-dir(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org;
ippm(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-08.txt> (Rate
Measurement Test Protocol Problem Statement) to Informational RFC
Ben, Dan, Greg,
Version 09 of -ippm-rate-problem draft addresses your comments to great
extent.
Although Ben's (GEN-ART) suggestion to clarify the figure in the Intro was
adopted, it seems reasonable to leave out the Figure numbers since the two
figures are referenced one time each and they are only 3 lines high (so not
likely to move far, if at all).
Dan's (OPS-DIR) comments have been addressed (following e-mail
exchange) by inserting a new section on Operational Considerations where
we have compromised on the text.
Greg's comments have been addressed to the extent possible without re-
visiting the "Toronto compromise" which only involved section 5.
Other comments cite WG agreements that have not actually been discussed
AFAIK, or refer to purely OPTIONAL features in the memo.
regards,
Al
________________________________________
From: IETF-Announce [ietf-announce-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of
The
IESG [iesg-secretary(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 9:43 AM
To: IETF-Announce
Cc: ippm(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-08.txt> (Rate Measurement
Test Protocol Problem Statement) to Informational RFC
The IESG has received a request from the IP Performance Metrics WG (ippm)
to consider the following document:
- 'Rate Measurement Test Protocol Problem Statement'
<draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-08.txt> as Informational RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2014-12-22. Exceptionally, comments
may be
sent to iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of
the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
Abstract
This memo presents an access rate-measurement problem statement for
test protocols to measure IP Performance Metrics. The rate
measurement scenario has wide-spread attention of Internet access
subscribers and seemingly all industry players, including regulators.
Key test protocol aspects require the ability to control packet size
on the tested path and enable asymmetrical packet size testing in a
controller-responder architecture.
The file can be obtained via
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-
3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dietf-2Dippm-2Drate-
2Dproblem_&d=AwICAg&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Q&r=I4dzGxR31OcNX
CJfQzvlsiLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=EKLRXCpGDaNYiJ9WjJgA2LRIdn0QDiC
yaT1frtYfg8Y&s=TnJHba-sAmj9BdGxYeMgYS-qoQBHT0QgbNSFjZ8snbo&e=
IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-
3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dietf-2Dippm-2Drate-
2Dproblem_ballot_&d=AwICAg&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Q&r=I4dzGxR3
1OcNXCJfQzvlsiLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=EKLRXCpGDaNYiJ9WjJgA2LRIdn
0QDiCyaT1frtYfg8Y&s=8MzkfnznQ4g4XC4ZfldXKZFpASLAK89Cf4ELdsZWIZ0&e
=
No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_gen-
2Dart&d=AwICAg&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Q&r=I4dzGxR31OcNXCJfQzvl
siLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=EKLRXCpGDaNYiJ9WjJgA2LRIdn0QDiCyaT1frt
Yfg8Y&s=Q8ccS1OgnV3UQ8TqslGmcf_Dz8hcuFK1jGvVfV6os7c&e=