John L wrote:
AR is basically a trace headerIt is? Says which requirement?Section 2.1 of Murray's draft says:
I didn't ask for what an individual submission says. I asked when and why and by what process this became a requirement. Oh, there isn't a process and there's
certainly little to no vetting, especially be the security community. Mike _______________________________________________NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
Previous by Date: | Re: [mail-vet-discuss] trace headers, was Draft as of 9/4/2007, John L |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Draft as of 9/4/2007, Eliot Lear |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [mail-vet-discuss] trace headers, was Draft as of 9/4/2007, John L |
Next by Thread: | Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Draft as of 9/4/2007, Eliot Lear |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |