On 3/11/08, Scott Kitterman <mail-vet-discuss(_at_)kitterman(_dot_)com> wrote:
On Tuesday 11 March 2008 19:50:33 Dotzero wrote:
Murray,
After reviewing section 2.4.3 I think it should be split out
separately for SPF and Sender-ID. A pass for SPF does not mean the
same thing as a pass for SIDF. Conflating the two is a recipe for
problems. Mail From pass from SPF is totally different from PRA pass
from SIDF.
Yes. This is definitely true.
Since PRA = From = Mail From about 80% of the time, it's an 80% solution. 80%
is good enough for Microsoft (I guess). Unless that's good enough for you,
I'd say they ought to be disambiguated.
You forgot to include the % of time that PRA=Sender and not From.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html