On May 1, 2000 at 13:57, Eric Ray wrote:
Here's the beginning of one of the problematic archives
<START PROBLEM>
... [snip] ...
</START PROBLEM>
<START FUNCTIONAL>
... [snip] ...
</START FUNCTIONAL>
As far as I can tell, they're identical in the significant ways. The Sender
is a .bitnet address in the non-functional ones, but ...
Some follow-up has occured in private. For those curious, the problem
with the old archive is that the message headers were not properly
terminated as defined by RFC822. The blank line between the headers
and the bodies have a SPACE character.
--ewh
