On May 26, 2002 at 21:56, J C Lawrence wrote:
Earl Hood <earl(_at_)earlhood(_dot_)com> wrote:
The AddressModifyCode works on the raw data. As for using "." is
address obfuscation, it is a very weak form since any decent address
harvester would expand entity references before doing detection.
A minor aside:
Is the address modification code smart enough to NOT munge
Message-IDs?
Making me look at the code again ...
Yes, it is smart enough. There is a hash defining the fields that
can have AddressModifyCode applied to them. Here are the fields that
apply:
apparently-from
apparently-to
bcc
cc
dcc
from
reply-to
resent-cc
resent-from
resent-sender
resent-to
return-path
sender
to
(This should probably be configurable by a resource).
Note, the AddressModifyCode is applied during the HTML generation
portion. Anything stored in the .mhonarc.db is in its raw form.
--ewh